| NOTICE! Please go to the new site |
| Posted by admin | |
| Saturday, 07 November 2009 16:07 | |
|
We have just launched our new site. Please go to http://malaysia-today.net/This site, mt.m2day.org , will continue to exist for your reference but it will no longer be updated.
You may find that the comments your posted the last 16 hours do not show in this new site. This is because it took us some time to migrate to the new site and the cut off time as midnight last night. You may not post your comments in this new site. Your log in is the same as for the old site. Comments (7)
![]()
...
written by siewchinteo, November 07, 2009 18:58:09
errrr....Superadmin.....your last para - "You may NOT post comment..." ???
slow n steady lah dude!!!! report abuse
disagree 0
agree 14
...
written by hellosunshine, November 07, 2009 19:33:37
Alamak! Not so user friendly lah. Old page, one look see all but this new one, have to search like hell.
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 26
...
written by taxidriver, November 07, 2009 20:54:21 somewhere in IN MALAYSIA: And the dying old pig said to its young breeder, "You have been kind that I am not slaughtered, like all others of my kin, though I know it was because I was carrying a virusB.N1corrupt practices,. I can see that like me you are infected, but you shall be saved, but what you may innocently pass on to others may have variable consequences."Snort! And the pig fell silent. A VULTURE NAMED MAHATHIR WITH BEST FRIEND LINGAM they say, nibbled on the carcass for a while, and flu away. It took sometime for the young man to come to terms with the event, he fell ill, but recovered. Prophetically, many other people in the town became sickcorrupt practices, some diedAbsurd.Horrible.If you have nothing to hide, why hide and create suspicion.You hide because you fear that disclosure would do more harm than hiding. The Evidence Act, 1972 says so. If you are asked to produced something in your possession and you don't produce it on demand, the presumption is that if produced it would go against your interest.It appears that the Opposition can win in court, but only in Round One!This is a tragic situation because it gives the impression that judgments are farcical and on the whole totally unacceptable. When people lose their faith in the judiciary, then the courts no longer stand a as a bastion for justice.In Anwar’s case, the High Court in respecting natural justice and recognising the amendment to Section 51A, ordered the prosecution “to allow Anwar’s lawyers to inspect CCTV recordings of the alleged crime scene, along with witness statement of the alleged victim, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan and that of other witnesses as well as doctors’ notes.The High Court also ordered the “medical reports on Mohd Saiful from two hospitals – Hospital Kuala Lumpur and Pusrawi Hospital – and other evidence favourable to the defence to be handed over to Anwar.This is a very fair judgment considering the fact that this information sought would eventually be made available to the defence during the trial.If that is the case, and when the amendment to Section 51A allows this, what is the justification in disallowing this vital information to the defence at this stage When a person is charged and his freedom is at stake, he deserves to be given every opportunity to prove his innocence.However, the Court of Appeal had overlooked this very important principle, giving the impression that the court is not concerned with justice and hardly looks at the substantive issues which deserve their critical attention.I have addressed a few mails to your counterpart Mr. Dhananjay Mahapatra under the heading "HIS MASTERS VOICE". I find that you are echoing the sentiments of Judiciary, as they know that era of their secrecy is over and soon they would be under Public Scrutiny. Ø When Judge after Judge is found indulging in corrupt practices, amassing wealth, how could we go with your line of reasoning? Ø There is also blackmailing going on. This particular Judge from Punjab & Haryana High Court who is allegedly being given a clean chit, had threatened that she alone is not involved and if persecuted she would expose all names. Is it not blackmailing? In my humble opinion, JUDICIARY IS THE CESSPOOL OF CORRUPTION IN THE COUNTRY. IT IS THE FOUNTAINHEAD. Least educated or qualified people occupy the highest position in judiciary. I am sorry to say that many of Judges do not have basic knowledge of English to read, understand and interpret law. What we need is a common code of conduct for all public servants, be it bureaucracy, members of legislatures, elected representative, constitutional appointees, and Judges. They must declare their assets every year, criminal record, if any, so on and so forth. And lastly pardon my saying this, what about Journalists, Newspapers & Electronic Media. You are wise enough to appreciate what I mean. We cannot wait for another sixty years for freedom; it should come to us now, and we would get it. I have not said anything worse that what you have said for Prashant Bhushan. My views must be published without moderation.read this exclusive full story story posted by the taxi driver@http://headline-news-online.********.com/ A VULTURE NAMED MAHATHIR WITH LINGAM displayed contempt for the rule of law.His frontal assault on the judiciary in 1988 an embarrassment for nation report abuse
disagree 5
agree 20
...
written by Kopi37, November 08, 2009 00:47:17
I too find the old format is more 'read friendly' than the new one. Probably i have been used to the old face after several years staring at it. Just like so many years looking at the old lady's face, the new first lady's face looks like ogre to me, just so strange!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 15
Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
|
i know we support VOTE FOR CHANGE...but not on MT-lah !!!
everybody recognise MT by this format marrrr.