A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow Letters/Surat arrow Car Duty vs Fuel Subsidy, Where Had The Car Duty Gone To?

Car Duty vs Fuel Subsidy, Where Had The Car Duty Gone To? PDF Print
Friday, 13 June 2008 12:58

An estimated of RM 162 billions had been collected over the past 22 years. Actual figures could be much higher..

By A concern citizen

Recent fuel hike had sparked anger across the country asking Petronas account to be made available for public scrutiny to justify why the government cannot continue to subsidy the fuel. May be all these while, Petronas may not be footing 100% of the fuel bill, is the car owners had paid in advance for fuel subsidy in form of import and excise duties for both local and foreign mad vehicles, as suggested by one article published in the Star recently, and republished by Malaysia Today.

Following up on this topic, I had done a little research myself, and may be others had already done it but did not get highlighted in a wider angle. I had visited the website of Malaysia Automotive Association to get the statistic of total vehicle sale from 1986 till 2007, to get a broad idea of estimated excise and import duties might have been collected by the government since the inception of Proton, as the import duties were imposed for the excuse of protecting our new start up that suppose to make our nation pride in years to come. Well, Proton is not an issue for our discussion here, so we will not talk about it's success or failure and the failure cost to the rakyat. Let's us guestimate how much we had contributed to the government coffers since 1986.

Total vehicle sales since 1986 amounted to 6,264,910 units, both passengers and commercial vehicles included. (Source:
http://www.maa.org.my/info_summary.htm). Assuming the ratio of 60% of total vehicles being locally produced, and rest of them are being imported. Also assuming average duty collected from local car is RM 10K each, and RM 50K for imported vehicles. Please note that I had made broad assumption, as the actual figure was never reported by the government in their annual budget and accounts.

An estimated of RM 162 billions had been collected over the past 22 years. Actual figures could be much higher as import tax was relatively high in the 90s before we signed the ASEAN free trade agreement. Where had the money gone? How much fuel subsidy had been given by the government on fuel after being offset by the car duties?

Such amount can be used to build a comprehensive rail network comparable to Japan and Europe, where almost all major cities are connected by rails. An efficient metro networks can also be build in Klang Valley comparable to London, Hong Kong and Singapore.

I hope the MP will continue to ask for actual figures in the Parliament and show to the rakyat that the car duty and Petronas proceed had been used in an accountable way.

Comments (40)Add Comment
...
written by manic_annie, June 13, 2008 13:01:34
Yeah, where had all the money disappeared to? Would be interesting to know...
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 129
...
written by james5501, June 13, 2008 13:02:30
Watsed on crooked bridge by crooked people!!!!!
report abuse
disagree 5
agree 73
...
written by james5501, June 13, 2008 13:03:34
sorry .... wasted
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 43
...
written by joeawk, June 13, 2008 13:09:07
The nations revenue runs into the trilliiiiiions over the years.Some are well spent, some are wasted and yet quite a big amount were siphoned off.

What else do you want to know?

report abuse
disagree 0
agree 81
...
written by Birdbrain, June 13, 2008 13:10:11
The people in the corridors of power is breeding a dirty colony of tax evaders and also tax abusers.

I bet you IRB doesn't even dare to question those living in huge mansions and driving exotic cars. These are the people who evade and abuse the taxes.

UMNO boleh!
Badawi Boleh!
Semua boleh!
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 71
...
written by zul4kulim, June 13, 2008 13:22:41
Anwar revealed latest plan in DUbai
http://1426.********.com/2008/...dubai.html
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 11
...
written by Citizen Watch, June 13, 2008 13:22:42
The President of FOMCA, Marimuthu must get his priorities right. After the announcement of the petrol price hike, he together with several consumer groups were quoted to support the government's move and urged the people not to take to the streets to protest. The people should change their lifestyle! Interestingly all of them said nearly the same thing. Two days later he said the public should thank the government for the promise not to raise price of oil anymore. He should be fighting for the consumers rights - period. Other than that he can just shut up!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 61
...
written by myvoice, June 13, 2008 13:29:53
Where else, all in the BN MP pocketlah, can built big istana, personal jet, personal yatch, heli, bungalow house in Australia. Can you imagine how a person (son of Ah Ling, Ah Samy, Ah Bodoh any many more) which in 30's can become millionaire?
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 39
...
written by TB Tan, June 13, 2008 13:38:51
If the government is adamant on not disclosing 'hidden' information i.e Petronas accounts, highway agreements - pressuring for them to revealed serves no meaning because at the end of the day what you will get even if it was disclose will be cosmetic reports ( no truth in it at all ). If you want the REAL truth, change the entire government and your new reps will have jurisdiction to scrutinize all these issues. Nothing less than this will we get to the TRUTH!!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 42
...
written by A MI, June 13, 2008 13:49:04
The President of FOMCA, Marimuthu must get his priorities right. ................He should be fighting for the consumers rights - period. Other than that he can just shut up!


I agree 100% Citizen watch. When I read how he was thanking the gomen when AAB clamied that there would be no futher hikes this year. I was wondering whose interests he is championing...obviously his own!!!!!!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 33
...
written by DJH, June 13, 2008 13:49:44
Something I received from email on "subsidy" analogy. How true

The story about “subsidy”…

A man called Maha owns a farm which can produce 10 apples every day.
He has 5 workers to operate the farm.
Each of them eats 1 apple daily and it is enough to keep them operating the farm normally.
The remaining 4 apples, the landlord sells them at RM10 each and he earns RM40.
He uses the RM25 to improve the farm operation and facilities.
He gives RM2.00 to each of his workers and he keeps the remaining RM5.00 as profit.
Day by day, the farm is well developed and all of the 5 workers are happy with the money they can save.

When Maha passed away and there is a new landlord, Abdul comes to continue the farm operation.
He says to the workers:” We need to improve the farm quality and redefine our way of thinking.
From now on all of you only need to pay RM1.00 for each apple you eat.
It is very cheap as the price is RM10 each outside the farm.”
The workers have no choice but to pay RM1.00 for the apple they eat daily.
Their earning decrease from RM2.00 to RM1.00 per person.
As usual, Abdul sells the 4 apples and he gets RM40.
He uses RM25 for farm improvement and pays RM10 to his 5 workers.
He gets RM5.00 as profit. On top of that, he gets another RM5.00 from the apples that he sells to his workers.
In total, he gets RM10 as profit every day.

Soon, the apple price increases to RM20 each.
The new landlord gets a higher profit as he gets RM80 for the 4 apples he sells daily.
Then, he decides to give the farming improvement contract to one of his close friend, Samy.
Samy says:”Apple cost naik, improvement cost also misti naik.”
So, the farm improvement cost increases from RM25 to RM50.
In actual, the improvement only cost RM30.
The remaining RM20, Abdul and Samy share evenly among themselves.

Let’s calculate how much Abdul gets daily:

RM10 (from farm improvement cost)
RM20 (Net profit by selling 4 apples: [Gross profit, RM80] - [Improvement cost, RM50] - [Wages RM10] = RM20)
RM5 (from selling apples to his workers)

In total, Abdul gets RM35 daily compare to RM10 initially when he takes over the farm from Maha.
His profit increases RM25 and the workers are still getting RM1.00 daily per person.
The greedy Abdul does not want to stop there.
One day, he says to his fellow workers:” You see ah, the current market price for one apple is RM20 and you are only paying RM1.
See how lucky you are! I have to SUBSIDY RM19.00 for each of the apple you buy and total I need to SUBSIDY RM95.00.
This will greatly burden the farm and we might get bankrupt if we continue like this.
In order to avoid bankruptcy, I need to increase the apple price that you buy from RM1.00 to RM1.50 and I will bear the remaining RM18.50 per apple as my subsidy to you all. ”
So, greedy Abdul adds RM2.50 to his current profit and the number becomes RM37.50.

After you have read the story, I am sure you have already understood the meaning of “SUBSIDY” given by the government.

The RM95 subsidy never existed in the first place and so was the RM52 billion fuel subsidy generously “given” by the government

Cutting fuel subsidy is actually just a reason to steal money from your pocket.
Are you gonna stand there and let them rob you? smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 125
...
written by alberttan, June 13, 2008 13:50:09
Could Marimuthu be Semi Vellu in disguise? Think like Semi, talk like Semi, kissing up like Semi...
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 18
...
written by cllim123, June 13, 2008 13:51:01
Not all cars are duty paid fully. Many are under declared and paid only nominal duty. Otherwise AP wont be so hot selling. Ask the AP king and queen.
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 24
...
written by A MI, June 13, 2008 13:53:19
Car Duty vs Fuel Subsidy, Where Had The Car Duty Gone To? ?????

UMNO top guns and kuncu-kuncus telan bulat bulat ler...

we don't need to patrol Straits of Melaka to control pirates...we have lanuns them running the gomen.

Anyone still wondering why price hike was done in such haste? Well there will be maximum $$$$$$$$$$ in the kitty and this can be siphoned out before September...cepat kaya skim of/by/for Bastardlahwi
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 20
...
written by Siputman, June 13, 2008 13:54:58
It's indeed very sad to have this kind of situation in M'sia, to have these bunch of BN ****ers. M'sia is doomed. Oil wil b gone very very soon in future. Petronas is not significant anymore by then. How does M'sia survive by then? Where to get income? How i wish M'sia is like S'pore. Even if the whole damn world is facing recession, S'pore is able to take care of its citizen for 30 years. No foreign dept, cash rich country.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 22
...
written by gctham, June 13, 2008 13:55:22
Let face it now. How beautiful the figure and figure that we can work out. there will not have an answer. Malaysia certainly should not have to come to this stage. We could have been better if not worst off than any other country in this Earth. The people must also be blame, who ask us to concur with all those ill perceived and ill implemented policies such as NEP, Ap etc. Well these policy will suit and serve certain purpose during good times but also due to to accumulated inefficiency effect compounded with those unchecked corrupt practices, NOW the people are ask to pay for it.

Malaysia has a good pool of talents and due to those stupid policy we have lost out to the world. We have goos education system but have been to third grade just because to fit into the quota, result again in the loss of competitiveness.

Just we have earn, collect a lot, at the same time those idiots high also spent a lot on un productive ways. When this so call oil hike crisis come a long, the people is feeling the heat. One may say all human being in the world also suffering, not only Malaysia, but the people of Malaysia has more right to get angry because to us we should not come to this stage and should not that worse off if all the reserve we have have been wisely spend.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 13
...
written by grant, June 13, 2008 14:05:35
The problem if I am not mistaken is that all cars are taxed with excise duty.. irregardless CKD cars also have excise duty, worse still imported cars have to pay import duty on top of that...

Why cant proton be exempted from all duties in this manner and sold cheaply to the rakyat? for instance, milon tin quality car wanna sell at RM70k where it is no match near any City or Vios.. Does the government know what they are doing?

And how do the government compute excise duty and import duty rates? The import duty is like 40% of OTR Car Price.. How do these idiots come to the number 40%? And at the end of the day, where does this money go to?
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 16
...
written by indianputra, June 13, 2008 14:07:37
Elsewhere in MT it is reported that Malaysia has lost 100 billion ringgit through absolute corruption and wastages by the BN government. Add in another 200 billion lost through non-accounting.

People, why are these people so greedy? Where is all the money now? Where are they hiding all these billions? Seriously, I think Malaysian leaders are worse than Mugabwe.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 21
...
written by grant, June 13, 2008 14:08:09
The concept that the government is approaching or applying onto Proton is like rearing your own chickens and apply sales tax when you sell to the consumer.. What kind of economics is this?

In the end, irregardless if the chicken is locally bred or imported, the consumer have to bear all aspects of hidden costs and tax... Bollocks!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 9
...
written by chin, June 13, 2008 14:12:00
Well, the holiday and entertainment monies had to come from somewhere.

The civil service more than doubled in numbers.

Inflation, RM50 per vote doesn't hack anymore, it RM200 today.

report abuse
disagree 2
agree 8
...
written by jjireh99, June 13, 2008 14:13:28
Back in the early 90s, when I was much younger and working, I was given the task of ordering mercedes benze for our directors. Back then, I was still ignorant of how much our import duties, etc were. When I got the quotation from C&C, I was shocked! RM300,000-00 as import excise duties. Car cost only RM95,000-00 for a E series back then. I couldn't believe my eyes! Why so much I asked. How much was collected during those times and it is the same up till now. So, how?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 14
...
written by kent chong, June 13, 2008 14:19:14
Hi Malaysian.. dont just complain here and there! We must do our part.. HOW? JOin Pakatan Rakyat either DAP/Keadilan or PAS to strengthen PR and fight with BN!
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 10
...
written by Jbao, June 13, 2008 14:40:17
Petrol price up before PM bows out – J Bao Friday 13 Jun 08
In Putra Jaya, lakes were dug in order to build the bridges
Highways built; not for public convenience but to extract a toll
Like its stupendous architectural designs and magnificent bridges
A corrupt, lying & brutal govt, devoid of human decency and soul.
Exploiting racial and money politics; aided by a tainted judiciary
A politically devious animal also known as UMNO

Anger thy neighbour, all in preference of an imaginary crooked bridge.
Instead of rejoicing oil exporters, we fret as high oil prices take its toll
Political crisis looms as we burn our economic bridges
Billions of oil money burnt and yet we were told
Umno Cronies will go bankrupt if we abolish tolls on highways and bridges
Petronas cannot afford fuel subsidy even if the profits were 10-fold.

Obviously the education system must have been so screwed up
For BN politicians to act like monkeys on any banana issues that popped out
How can the Pg bridge negotiated contract price be revised 60% up,
Less than 6 months after PR wiped BN out?
With annual inflation of just 3% and no big issues cropping up
The BN Fed govt is using dirty tactics to force the PR Pg govt out
Higher contract price will burden the Raykat with tolls going up,
Why would he care, if more kickbacks can be squeezed before the flip-flop PM bows out.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 10
...
written by gadissarawak, June 13, 2008 14:52:25
Ustaz Idris Haji Ahmad
Tue | Jun 10, 08 | 11:07:35 am MYT
1.Harga minyak terpaksa dinaikkan ekoran harga minyak di peringkat antarabangsa melambung tinggi.
Kenapa pula Malaysia perlu sakit??Sedangkan Malaysia negara pengeluar minyak bukan pengimport minyak. Kalau harga minyak dunia naik maka negara kita akan bertambah kaya.
Analogi yang lain, kalau kita ada dusun durian, tentu kita dan keluarga gembira kerana harga buah durian mahal. Anak kita boleh makan dengan puas dan kita pula boleh dapat wang banyak. Tetapi pemimpin BN-Umno pula pelik apabila harga minyak dunia naik, rakyat pula menderita terutama mereka yang berpendapatan rendah.
2.Harga minyak kita lebih murah jika hendak dibanding dengan negara Asean yang lain.
Jangan banding dengan Thailand, Indonesia. Perlu banding dengan Brunai kerana harga minyak di negaranya RM1.20 seliter.
Buah Oren dengan epal tidak boleh buat perbandingan. Perlu dingat juga, walaupun Indonesia, Thailand minyaknya mahal, tetapi barang keperluan harian dan pakaian serta barang yang sudah siap murah seperti makanan, pakaian, alat perabot semuanya murah.Di negara kita semuanya mahal daripada minyak sampai kepada keperluan yang lain. Yang murah hanya maruah pemimpin Umno-BN sahaja.
3. Minyak di Singapura lebih mahal daripada Malaysia. Singapura bukan negara pengeluar minyak. Tambahan pula pendapatan rakyatnya tinggi, contohnya pencuci lantai gaji hampir RM2000 ringgit di Malaysia, hanya RM600. Begitu juga pengangkutan awam antara yang terbaik di dunia, di Negara Malaysia Hadhari paling teruk.Di negaranya tol hanya dikenakan waktu tertentu sahaja, sedangkan di Malaysia siang malam, 'non stop'.
4. Wang subsidi petrol RM56 bilion akan digunakan untuk pembangunan. Kita hendak tanya ke mana wang subsidi ini akan pergi.Adakah hendak belanja untuk Monsun Cup yang menghabiskan wang rakyat RM 250 juta, Formula 1 yang berapa kerat rakyat yang mampu hendak menonton. Sedangkan belanja untuk Formula 1, tahun 2004-RM98.4 juta, tahun 2005-RM110.7j, 2006-RM121.8j, 2007-130.5j.Belanja konduktor Malaysian Philharmonic Orchestra sebanyak RM3.5 juta sebulan yang diambil daripada wang Petronas. Apakah ini yang dimaksudkan untuk pembangunan.Ketika minyak naik 30 sen kerajaan mengumumkan RM4 bilion subsidi akan digunakan untuk memperbaiki pengangkutan awam. Kita tidak nampak pengangkutan awam bertambah baik malahan makin teruk.
5. Ucapan lidah bercabang pemimpin negara, kesian rakyat kerana minyak naik. Ucapan hanya hendak menyejuk hati rakyat.Kalau mereka kesian kepada rakyat mereka mesti memikirkan masalah rakyat. Pak Menteri tidak kisah elaun dan gaji hampir RM56 ribu sebulan. Minyak naik RM5 seliter pun mereka tidak kisah.
6. Pemimpin Umno-BN berkempen supaya beli barang murah.
Kita hendak tanya kedai mana ada jual barang murah. Kalau ada barang keperluan yang murah boleh dibeli di pejabat Umno baguslah.
7. Hendak ambil tindakan kepada peniaga yang jual barang mahal.
Pemimpin Umno/BN kata jual dengan harga lama masih untung. Mana ada peniaga hendak jual barang murah kalau modal sudah mahal.
Kalau minyak naik, semua barang akan naik, kerana barang bukan bawa dengan beca roda tiga.
Persatuan Lori sudah mengumumkan bahawa mereka akan naik tambang kos pengangkutan 35 peratus. Kerana lori 10 tan dulu hanya perlu untuk minyak RM3000 sebulan sudah mencecah naik kepada RM5000.
8. Kenyataan pemimpin Umno yang hendak membodohkan rakyat supaya jangan marah apabila minyak naik.
"Kita bimbang sekiranya minyak murah rakyat tak cermat dan minyak akan kurang,"kata Perdana Menteri.
"Belanja secara berhemah,"kata Datin Rosmah Mansur.
"Ubah gaya hidup...membazir Islam marah,"kata Dato' Seri Najib.
Datuk Seri Shahidan Kasim sewaktu minyak naik 30 sen dulu dia suruh pegawai kerajaan naik basikal.
Saya hendak cadangkan supaya pemimpin Umno-BN ambil cermin suluh muka baru boleh nasihat rakyat.
Inilah rupa pemimpin yang memerintah negara kita hari ini. Ya Allah selamatkanlah negara..
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 11
...
written by slash n burn, June 13, 2008 14:55:04
Scrap besi buruk Proton - buying proton is no less than giving money to NEP UMNOputra straight to their pocket.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 7
..., Lowly rated comment [Show]
...
written by Zapper, June 13, 2008 15:12:15
Those guys in power are a bunch of low life thieves; otherwise, how can they afford all the luxuries based on their salary. Therefore, it is not a wonder that they will try to cling on to the tiny string of power if even though the rakyat has rejected them. Every incoming PM from the BN will try to cover the wrong doings of their ex-bosses.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 8
...
written by sukinong, June 13, 2008 15:22:36
Pak Lah, you want redemption? Catch all those who korek from the nation and make them return everything back. You know where it has gone to......

Close your eyes...think....search your soul whether is it worth while to incur the anger and curses from the rakyat. Ask Jeanne for guidance, I am sure she want you to do the right thing.

Can you burden all this bad karma? Your shoulder is lopsided and your back is hunching now. Think again.... retribution can go a long way and many of your coming generation can suffer.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 10
...
written by mikefonz, June 13, 2008 16:40:01
As I have said and I'll say it again. Our Goverment want to show that they promote our policies to be TRANSPARENT but actually making them DISAPPEAR.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 5
...
written by sararaj, June 13, 2008 16:59:16
as long as this government doesn't reveal the accounts of petronas... ppl will continue to make their own assumptions on where all this dough has gone... why don't they just release the documents to the parliament and then we see whether what they've done with the money was just or unjust... it'll make everyone happy and if they prove to be trythful in what they say then they will definately get renewed support from the public... but i guess their too stupid to realise this and they have probably squandered the people's money... so they are afraid of releasing the accounts and are very sure they will be implicated if done so... bubble jer... konon nyer nak cemerlang, gemilang, dan terbilang... keparitlah...
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 4
...
written by Thomas Aw, June 13, 2008 17:19:49
Part of the money gone to subsidizes Proton?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by cllim123, June 13, 2008 17:59:38
My neighbour just bought a brand new BMW 318. This saturday going to get her rebate of RM625 from pos malaysia. Malaysia boleh!! yahoo!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by zza11, June 13, 2008 18:34:45
High duties on automotive is not reflecting the country moving towards a developed nation. Developed nation like USA have no duties on cars and no road tax and no toll for interstate highways. The high duties is a luxury tax meaning the government do not recognize automobiles as necessity but luxury. If we add up the duties plus road tax, tolls and the present fuel price (even the old fuel price) the cost to have a car in Malaysia is much higher than the US. If have been paying RM1,000 per month for our car it should have been RM 600 only. In other words if our petrol price is like the US at US$4/gallon but we do not pay duties on our car and no toll and no road tax we are better of than we are right now. I did the maths and that's for sure. So BN please do not talk about fuel subsidy only you have taken so much more.


report abuse
disagree 0
agree 4
...
written by mgeo, June 13, 2008 18:56:38
Questions for the free-market proponents agaist subsidy:

1. Why is our import/purchase of petrol/diesel not more than offset by these sources of income? (a) Rising income from exported/sold crude, at above-average price (b) Petronas income from overseas ops. (c) Tax on foreign petroleum co's operating here (d) Tax on fuel retail (e) Taxes from encouraging roads & cars instead of buses: vehicle purchase tax & AP tax protecting Proton, road tax, toll tax.

2. How is the implied Malaysian market price including subsidy of RM3.00 for petrol arrived at?

3. How much of Petronas total payment to govt. of RM 359 billion is reflected as income in the various annual govt. budgets?

4. How much of the RM 170 billion "re-invested" by Petronas went to these, and are they allowed in the corporate charter? : (1) leasing business (planes to MAS, oil tankers to MISC, office space in Twin Towers) (2) symphony orchestra and its theatre (3) stake in failed banks (4) motor racing (5) university (6) electricity generation.

5. Why is our fuel price far higher than in other petroleum-producing countries? [30/5/08, at USD1=RM3.23: UAE RM 1.19, Egypt 1.03, Bahrain 0.87, Qatar 0.68, Kuwait 0.67, Saudi 0.38, Iran 0.35, Nigeria 0.32, Turkmenistan 0.25, Venezuela 0.16.]

6. Some oil-producing nations, especially Norway, Kuwait, Alberta (Canada) have invested their wealth prudently. What savings do we have to show?

7. A whole tanker ship of subsidised diesel was nearly smuggled out by "pirates", but for the courage of one sailor. Has any syndicate able to afford such an enterprise been punished? What is the current volume of subsidised diesel that does not reach retail pumps?

8. Why is the bus transport industry (the cheapest) in such shambles and no incentives given for efficiency, while the highway and car industries are encouraged? [Problems: multiple regulatory agencies, sudden changes of rules, inadequate subsidised fuel until now, toll like other inefficient transport, no rise/subsidy in fares, insufficient enforcement, failure to build bus stops, pipes as seats at bus-stands].

9. What is the benefit to the country of these related "privatisations" and related profits: APs, Proton, toll, toll "compensations" (38.5 billion to 2006).
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by rainmanpj, June 13, 2008 22:26:04
If you look at the announcement in the paper last 2 days, cutting down only
20% of the govn entertainmant expenses will save RM 2000 million or Rm 2 billions.
So the old expenses was Rm10 billion per year on entertainment alone.
Multiply that by 10 years.That is just one of the way where money went to.
All Govn salary not included.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by kotiroq, June 13, 2008 23:49:51
written by rainmanpj, June 13, 2008 | 22:26:04

If you look at the announcement in the paper last 2 days, cutting down only
20% of the govn entertainmant expenses will save RM 2000 million or Rm 2 billions.
So the old expenses was Rm10 billion per year on entertainment alone.
Multiply that by 10 years.That is just one of the way where money went to.
All Govn salary not included.


i believe it was 10% cut, not 20%. so its 20 billion per year. so multiply by 10 years that would be 200,000,000,000,000 ( rm200 billion ). and its all for BN and its all from the 27,000,000,000 malaysian.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 1
...
written by Forex, June 14, 2008 00:53:29
Let's do some simple calculations here.
In Malaysia , the average family income is RM3,000 /month
(where father works, mother doesn't).
I understand there are many families whose
monthly income does not reach RM3,000,

but, to make things simple,

let's take RM3,000 as the figure. Ok lah, right?

Okay, let's start rolling with a family which has

Papa, Mama, 1 daughter and 1 son. Ngam-ngam ....


Calculation starts...

> > > Electricity and water bill: RM100
> > > (No air-con, No home theatre, No water heater ... ok?)
> > > Phone bill ( Telekom): RM100
> > > Meals for a happy family: RM775
> > > (3 meals on RM25/day, RM25 for 4 persons...?)
> > > Papa makan / teh-tarik during working hrs: RM155
> > > (RM5/day, RM5 ... can eat what?)
> > > Car repayment: RM400
> > > (A proton saga aeroback, 7 yrs repayment)
> > > Petrol (living in city, traffic-jam): RM300
> > > (go to work, bring son to school, only can afford one car running)
> > > Insurance: RM650
> > > (kids, wife and myself)
> > > House repayment: RM750
> > > (low cost housing repayment for 30 yrs, retired still have to work to pay!)
> > > Tuition: RM80
> > > (got that cheap meh? i don't think so)
> > > Older children pocket money @ school: RM20
> > > (RM1/day, eat bread?)
> > > School fees: RM30
> > > (enough ah?)
> > > School books and etc: RM100
> > > (always got extra to pay in school)
> > > Younger children milk powder: RM50
> > > (cannot have the DHA, BHA, PHA one, expensive)
> > > Miscellaneous: RM100
> > > (shampoo, rice, sauce, toilet paper)


Oh wait!!! I have to stop here, so...
No Astro,
no movie @ cinema,
no DVD,
no CD,
no online,
cannot KFC,
cannot McDonald,
cannot go Park walk during weekend (petrol expensive),
no chit chat on phone with grandparents, and etc...


Let's use a calculator to total up... WALAO EH! Shit! RM3,610 already...


EPF belum potong, income tax lagi........oledi RM3,610 ...
How to survive lah tuan-tuan dan puan-puan sekalian ???
Our Deputy Prime Minister asked us to change lifestyle?
How to change? Don't eat? Don't work? Don't send children to school and study?

Besides that, I believe in Malaysia population, there are millions of rakyat Malaysia which still don't earn RM3,000/month!!!

What is this? Inilah Malaysia Boleh... Sorry... it should be Malaysians Boleh , because we're still alive and kicking!!

Our politicians must be mad!!!!
Please forward and comment boleh or tak boleh. No wonder so many Ah Loong around..


report abuse
disagree 0
agree 7
...
written by jimfish, June 14, 2008 09:31:49
maybe we can find those money in the Swiss bank ... smilies/cool.gif
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by shiokguy, June 14, 2008 13:15:45


My dream car for US44K x 3.6 = RM158K?
Link http://autos.aol.com/bmw-525-2007:8243-overview

When can my dream come through?
http://shiokguy.********.com/2...roton.html

Shiok Guy
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1
...
written by shiokguy, June 14, 2008 13:18:14
Malaysian price?

****** it lah....

or here http://www.******.com.my/cse?c...&sa=Search



Shiok Guy
http://shiokguy.********.com/


P/S: Visit my blog on current issue and opinion on the following: -
Thug from Syabas. BLR Free Home Loan,Home Based Jobs
Advise to PM,Profit from latest petrol subsidy scheme
Petrol price hike, PSD Scholarship, Result of NS Poll
Thugs at Jln Balai Polis, Cook shit for police to eat
Real Life Malaysian Inflation Rate,Local VS Foreign Graduate
Proportional Representation and More....

report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM