A+ | A- | Reset
Home

Hindu identity makes the difference PDF Print
Monday, 07 January 2008 14:43

By Malarmannan, Organiser

Though the Malaysian Mohammedan state boasts that its society is multi-cultural and multi-faith and that it is tolerant to other religions, Wahabism, the intolerant, high handed oppressive brand of Mohammedanism is gaining ground with every passing day in Malaysia. Quite contrary to its earlier shade, Malaysia’s official dark green is becoming darker and darker very fast.

Image

When Malaysia’s Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF) chairman and Barrister at Law (Lincoln’s Inn) Shri P. Waythamoorthy was in Chennai on a mission to garner moral support to the agitating minority Hindus for their basic rights in his country, even most of the mediapersons repeatedly questioned him as to why should they focus on their religion while calling their organisation instead of projecting themselves either as Malaysian citizens of Indian origin or Malaysian Tamils. The bewildered HINDRAF chairman was confused for a few seconds and soon recovered to retort: “It is because as Hindus by faith and culture that we face the challenge.”

The mediapersons were still uncompromising: If you call yourself an ethnic minority of Indian origin or Malaysian Tamils, it would be easier to get their voice heard at every quarter, they argued. Frankly speaking, this is the mindset of most of the people especially in Tamil Nadu, as a result of the ‘socio-political infection’ called pseudo- secularism and the seventy five years old influence of Dravidian movement that has sowed the seeds of parochialism in the minds of the gullible.

Shri Waythamoorthy sadly revealed that he had to face similar questions almost everywhere, even though he was explaining that the issues were related exclusively to the citizens of Malaysia as Hindus. In the guise of development and improving infrastructure, hundreds of Hindu temples are being razed to the ground in the Malaysian capital, whereas deviation takes place in haste from the original plan if a mosque stands in the way. And many of these temples are hundred years old; some seventy five or fifty, constructed during colonial days. Among those demolished, only a few were offered alternative sites but they are either adjacent to drainage or unfit for any congregation. Even then, after years of patience, Malaysian Hindus did not plan to air their objection to the Malaysian government. Their sole objective was to march peacefully to the office of the British High Commissioner to submit a memorandum to the queen of Britain to remind her Majesty’s moral responsibility in resolving their issues. Malaysian government, despite claiming to be a democracy, did not allow this normal democratic practice, and had also taken ruthless repressive measures to suppress their grievances, determined to teach them a lesson so that they do not dare in future to let off their steam in public.

Though the Malaysian Mohammedan state boasts that its society is multi-cultural and multi-faith and that it is tolerant to other religions, Wahabism, the intolerant, high handed oppressive brand of Mohammedanism is gaining ground with every passing day in Malaysia. Quite contrary to its earlier shade, Malaysia’s official dark green is becoming darker and darker very fast. This is the reality today, not only in Malaysia but all over the world, wherever Mohammedan community has its presence. Increase in the number of Mohammedan women in black burqua is the indication for Wahabism having taken deep and strong roots in their mohalla or jamat.

Issues before Malaysian Hindus for being Hindus are varied. Mother and child, husband and wife are forcibly separated if one’s name is mistakenly or purposely registered as Mohammedan. If any Hindu male gets converted to Mohammedanism, his wife and even major offsprings are automatically taken for granted to be Mohammedans. They are sent to religious reformation schools if they raise any objection to their forced conversion. It is needless to explain that these so-called religious reformation schools are nothing but similar to concentration camps of communist countries. If a Hindu finds his or her religion wrongly registered as Mohammedan and application for rectification is filed, there ends the peaceful and normal existence of that person. The religious reformation school alias concentration camp opens its iron gates and until the person changes his or her mind and consents to be a Mohammedan, he or she is virtually a prisoner. A recent case of this sort of arrogance is that of one young mother by name Revati, who was separated from her small baby and husband, and shut in the religious reformation school just because she wanted her religion to be corrected as Hindu in the records. All along, she had been a practising Hindu, living with her grand mother since her childhood, who is also a Hindu but her parents living elsewhere were converted to Mohammedanism at a point of time. That was enough for the administration to treat her also a Mohammedan. Again, a Hindu, just because either intentionally or inadvertently registered as a Mohammedan, when dies, is forcibly buried in a Mohammedan burial ground, deprived of Hindu rites.

These are some of the Hindu specific issues for people in Malaysia for being Hindus. And a Hindu wrongly recorded as Mohammedan wants to be officially corrected as Hindu so that he or she need not be under the purview of medieval Mohammedan civil code of Sharia that is in force in Malaysia. There is also much more socio-cultural neglect for being Hindus. In the light of these facts, it is quite essential for Malaysian Hindus to identify themselves as Hindus instead of projecting as citizens of Indian origin or Malaysian Tamils. Calling themselves as people of Indian origin will make them vulnerable to the charge of being unfaithful to the country that has accepted them as its own citizens, still fond of being identified as people of the country from where their forefathers migrated. And if they pose as Malaysian Tamils, they would be voluntarily limiting their scope to a narrow linguistic circle in drawing attention and sympathy.

Today, Hinduism has become universal, true to its ancient characteristics of Vasudhaivakutum-bakam. There are many non-Hindustanis who willingly and devotedly follow Hindu faith and its rich culture. In depth study of Hindu philosophy has drawn many non-Hindustanis to be staunch Hindus, without any need to getting converted to Hinduism ritually. And there are many Hindu organisations now with international reach to take up any Hindu cause. Also, many Hindus with the origin of Hindustan irrespective of the difference in their mother tongue are living as one community in various nations with legitimate citizenship.

Going by these factors, it is time not only for Malaysian Hindus but Hindus all over the world to identify themselves as Hindus so that the feel of oneness would solidly stand in support behind them in all their efforts to retain their faith and culture and assert their rights.

(The writer can be contacted at Second floor, 67/12, Bajanai Koil Street, Pallippattu Main Road, Chennai-600 113.)

Comments (10)Add Comment
...
written by kamal, January 07, 2008 15:18:36
We need to appreciate HINDRAF for creating an awareness that the Mlaysian Indians have been marginalised by the government as 'fourth class' citizen. The HINDU must have been incorporated since most affected we hindus, since the Indian muslims were ssomewhat able to pass out with 'bumiputra status or first class citizen, who are given everything.

But just trying to pick on certain terms like 'hindu' or ethnical cleansing' and so forth is total irrelevant. The main and important isuue is WHETHER THE INDIANS ARE MARGINALISED?' and to this question the answer is YES.

The blame need to go to Malaysian Indian Congress (MIC). This political party within the ruling government had always told its to be the 'champion of the Indians' but did not care to do anything concrete and rational so that this community could live a good life. Whatever benefits offerred by the ruling government, Barisan Nasional (BN) of which it is one of the 'big' component party, was given to close associates rather than to the deserving ones in the grassroot. The rich keep becoming rich, which the poor and have-nots keep not having but given empty promises all the time.

That was why a huge crowd had supported HINDRAF. They have come miles aways with nothing to benefit except sprayed by chemical water from water cannons and some arrested although the gathering was really peaceful, which the Federal Constitution clearly provides for any group to voice their grievances.

But as usual, the powerful will use all their power to suppress and with the aid of our police force, things turn ugly.

Rather than rely once again for MIC to do this job, the government, if sincerely interested in resolving their plight, THE PRIME MINISTER YAB DATUK SERI ABDULLAH AHMAD BADAWI need to untake this task and undertake programmes to uplift this Indian community immediately. This will indirectly SHAME the officials of MIC, which is long overdue.

The Malysian Indians are peaceful and caring people with small demands. The BN government will be able to comfort them easily if direct involvement is undertaken.

Read my blog KAMAL-TALKS http://kamal-talksmalaysia.********.com for more comments.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 27
..., Lowly rated comment [Show]
...
written by FFT, January 07, 2008 16:17:06
written by Nochan:
Appreciate the writer note that there is no such thing as Mohammaden religion.

Until you draw a little cartoon, that is.
report abuse
disagree 3
agree 19
...
written by gloryredstar, January 07, 2008 17:51:38
The British used to called Muslim as Mohammedden as they were the followers of Muhammad. This term can even be found in books describing the Brooke Dynasty in Sarawak.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 21
...
written by Sutha, January 08, 2008 02:53:48
If the followers of Buddha's teachings are Buddhists and the followers of Christ are Christians, no harm in calling the followers of Mohammed be called Mohammedans.

There is nothing deregotary about the word Mohammed, its sound nor meaning.

The Hindu religion is Sanadhana Dharma (Eternal Righteousness) but based on what the chinese called, it is Hinduism (Tsintu, the Indus valley civilisation).
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 8
..., Lowly rated comment [Show]
...
written by duncan, January 08, 2008 10:42:33
squabling on labels...? perfectly reflects whats wrong in this country when there are more pressing issues here. Ethinic clensing? not in the direct sense of the word...but I dun think its a long stretch from it either...thats wat the govt shows when it rears its ugly fangs to the other races/religons, just to pacify and gain the votes of the Malay/Muslims. We know wat needs to be done during the next GE...just do it!!!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 5
...
written by temenggong, January 08, 2008 17:10:27
Mohammedan was the term used till the 1940s by the muslims themselves.

Anyone who follows the Sunnah is a mohammedan, for he is guided by Mohammed and his life, rather than guided by the koran. Those guided by the koran are called muslims.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by addrk, January 08, 2008 22:32:35
If the debate about the use and reference of the word Mohammedan gets any hotter, some esteemed Minister may be forced to intervene and ban the use of the word by any non-Muslim or non-Moslem or non- Mohammedan or non-Islamic-faith-follower. If the meaning is understood, why quibble over its political incorrectness ?

HINDRAF's choice of words : Hindu and not Indian ; ethnic cleansing and not just non-affirmative action, are not accidental. It was deliberate. Hindu temples were subject to being destroyed or relocated to ungodly locations. Ethnic cleansing does not only refer to what Rwanda went through or what Hitler championed. The systematic deprivation of religious expressions, which would consequentially erode its cultural influence and ultimately eliminate the language, is a more diabolical method. That may be a slower process, but it leads to the same exit door.

Regardless of whatever, after HINDRAF, everyone from Ministers to un-heard of politicians, have suddenly taken an interest in Indian and or Hindu affairs. Even Samy Vellu ! Mayne it was HINDRAF, maybe it is the Election fever. Whichever the case, HINDRAF recorded an entry in the Malaysian Book of Records and it certainly wasnt for the longest satay stick.

Cheers.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 5
...
written by Sutha, January 10, 2008 01:29:06
Dei Nochan,
First you said there is no such thing as Mohammedan religion. Sixteen hours later you say there is a great difference between Mohammedan religion and islam. What you talking, man? What is the difference?

Buddhist was never considerd god though prayed to. Jesus is considered son of god and seldom prayed to. Let Mohammedan religion be one of the many types. Ok what! Mohammedans are guided by the Hadith, aren't they?

May be we should follow what the learned Raja Petra says. Till then, Mohammedan religion stays.


report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

Sponsored Links

World Futures  Moscow's Middle East conference: Should the Muslims depend only on the US to solve the Palestine crisis?

Future Fastforward  A controversial analysis by a controversial analyst, Matthias Chang, the lawyer-writer who unabashedly calls a spade a spade and offers no apology for doing so.

Internet TV 3000+ Channels  Pick your favorite internet TV channels straight to your PC! Yay!

Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM