A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow News/Commentaries arrow Malaysia furious over renewed Sabah claims

Malaysia furious over renewed Sabah claims PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Wednesday, 28 May 2008 10:38

Rumblings from freed rebel Nur Misuari and the regrouping of the Moro National Liberation Front are reportedly serious concerns

By Al Jacinto, The Manila Times

Zamboanga City: A senior Malaysian politician, furious over a renewed Philippine claim to Sabah, have called for stricter laws on Filipinos traveling to the oil-rich state.

Sabah Progressive Party President Datuk Yong Teck Lee said Malaysia’s National Security Council (NSC) should closely watch developments in the southern Philippines with the collapse of the Moro peace deal and release of former rebel leader Nur Misuari, Malaysia’s Star reported.

Lee said the withdrawal last month of the Malaysian truce observers from Mindanao was a clear indication of the failure of the peace process involving the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).

“Further worries included the rumblings from freed rebel Nur Misuari over the Philippines’ claim to Sabah and the regrouping of the Moro National Liberation Front [MNLF],” the Star said.

Misuari, who was ousted as MNLF chairman by Muslimin Sema, MNLF’s secretary-general, wanted the International Court of Justice to settle the Philippine claims on Sabah if Malaysia fails to resolve the issue.

Lee said the NSC and the Sabah State Security Committee should act on the problems brought about by the failure of the peace process and Misuari’s revival of the Sabah claims.

“All these warrant the immediate attention of the National Security Council in Putrajaya and the Sabah State Security Committee,” he said.

He also urged Kuala Lumpur to suspend the ferry service between Zamboanga and Sandakan. “Malaysia can also suspend the Zamboanga-Sandakan ferry service, impose bonds on incoming visitors, require ferry passengers to have return tickets and step up enforcement at all levels of government,” he said.

The Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo lays claim to Sabah. The Sultanate of Sulu was a Muslim state that ruled over much of the islands off the Sulu Sea. It stretches from a part of the island of Mindanao in the east, to North Borneo, now known as Sabah, in the west and south and to Palawan in the north.

The Sultanate of Sulu was founded in 1457 and is believed to have existed as a sovereign nation for at least 442 years. The Sultanate of Sulu obtained Sabah from Brunei as a gift for helping put down a rebellion on Borneo Island.

The British leased Sabah and transferred control over the territory to Malaysia after the end of the Second World War. Even after Borneo became part of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur still pays an annual rent of 5,000 ringgit to the heirs of the Sultan of Sulu Ismail Kiram.

Misuari said what Malaysia pays to the Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo is but a pittance.

The MNLF, under Misuari, signed a peace deal with Manila in September 1996, ending more than three decades of bloody fighting in Mindanao. It also accepted a limited autonomy over four Muslim provinces, namely, Sulu, Tawi-Tawi, Lanao del Sur and Maguindanao, that were later expanded into five provinces with Basilan as an addition, and now has become six with the inclusion of Shariff Kabunsuan.

Misuari later became governor of the Muslim autonomous region, but later accused the government of failing to honor the peace agreement, and his forces attacked major military bases and held hostage civilians in Sulu province and Zamboanga City in November 2001.

He fled to Sabah, his former refuge, but was arrested by Malaysian authorities and sent back to Manila where he is now facing rebellion charges and currently out on bail.

Sema said the issue on Sabah has been a long irritant between the Philippines and Malaysia, and he appealed to Misuari not to use this to stir restlessness among local Muslims in Mindanao.

“This has been a very old issue and we don’t want to strain our good relations with Malaysia at the expense of everybody. The Philippines has in the past approached this old issue with diplomacy and respect to maintain good bilateral relations with Malaysia and we want this to continue,” Sema told The Manila Times.

Comments (30)Add Comment
...
written by technoboy, May 28, 2008 10:49:29
What is there to be furious about, part of TDM's plan to achieve 70 million population thru such immigrants from Southern Philippines and Indonesia, the end game is clear.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 32
...
written by indianputra, May 28, 2008 10:51:37
May be this is what the Sabahans 'who voted in BN' in the last General Election wants.

What next? Manila take the case to ICJ?
report abuse
disagree 3
agree 26
...
written by oster, May 28, 2008 10:53:20
If there was a referendum on Sabah's future, Sabahans will choose independence before ever contemplating the Suluk Sultanate or the Philippines. Nonetheless, our fellow Malaysians must remember that we are staunch Malaysians as well, as long as the principles of federalism are upheld (they aren't, presently).

The claim on Sabah is also spurious. The Brunei Sultanate never achieved full control of the state and therefore couldn't even "give" the state to the Sulu Sultanate. The Brits were in fact the first organisational force to unite the current lands of Sabah under one administration.

He also urged Kuala Lumpur to suspend the ferry service between Zamboanga and Sandakan.


Ever since I was able to read the Daily Express, by far the most word I've seen Sabahan politicians use in political discourse is "urge". This is how bad our federation have fallen. Sabahan MPs are so feeble and weak that all they can ever do to get anything done is to "urge" the federal government to do something, even if it is a highly localised matter that should be under the state government.

Rise up Sabahans, and start claiming your States' Rights! Immigration and Local Law Enforcement and Local Education should be under the complete purview of the state governments.
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 42
...
written by Ben Nordin, May 28, 2008 11:02:28
The people of Sabah have been asking the government to look into these matters for sometime now. No doubt they feel threatened. You have illegal immigrants coming in by the boatloads and the government is still dragging their feet. And the 'Project IC' or 'Project M' is compounding the problem. Investigations on the 'Project IC' and tightening security against illegal immigrants are long overdue. The time for rhetorics and cosmetic changes are long past due. Malaysians found directly involved in these activities and profiting by them, in monetary value or in kind, should be considered as traitors to the country since they put the security of Malaysians in harms way.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 15
...
written by batsman, May 28, 2008 11:03:33
No point closing the stable door after the horse has bolted. The UMNO govt ignored national problems and instead concentrated on racial jealousies during its 50 years rule. It bullied weak and marginalised citizens and played up racism to bolster its power. The result is that the whole nation has suffered.

UMNO preferred to suck up to big powers that are known to bully weak nations in other parts of the world in order make money and rip off the wealth of the nation. If Malaysia is dismembered, it will be entirely UMNO's fault.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 11
...
written by eeyaw, May 28, 2008 11:03:51
Padam Muka!

Point the fingers at Mamathir and the MPs of Sabah, and to the Voters of Sabah if you don't take actions to pressure your MPs very soon Sabah will be lost forever.
report abuse
disagree 3
agree 9
...
written by sydput, May 28, 2008 11:05:43
Leasing means the british acknowledge the territory belongs to sultan of sulu. Malaysia continues to pay, means that we too acknowledge that territory belongs to sultan of sulu. leasing agreement will expire the moment we fail to honour our annual payments and depends on terms of contract.
But we are lucky because the philipines does not recognise the sultan of sulu, as their area was annexed into the phillipines without the consent of the sultans. So as far as phillipines is concerned, the sultan ceased to exist, and therefore phillipines have no rights to sabah.
So the descendants of the sultan of sulu have legal rights to sabah. Those illegal immigrants that are cursed are the true owners of sabah. whether they have rights to abode is another thing. Next time, don't simply curse these people. The sulus were in the area longer than some of those cursing them.
report abuse
disagree 5
agree 12
...
written by uncleleow, May 28, 2008 11:10:05
Don't wayang kulit lar. The master plan is hatched years ago, giving Sabah away via influx of Philippine with MyKad. By the next 30 years there will be 2 times more Philippine than actual Sabahan and they will force UN to do a referendum. Sabah will than belong to Philippine. Bagus....BN
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 14
...
written by arazak, May 28, 2008 11:13:21
Suddenly, many BN politicians are furious that thier "anak tiri" had been claimed by someone else. All this while the "anak tiri" had been sleeping in the toilet of a big bunglow. The anak tiri has also been making money for the family and he receives only 5% of what he makes. The rest of the money goes to the "bapak tiri" and his cronies. When the "anak tiri" asked for 20%, the bapak tiri said "no way". Even worse, the bapak tiri do not allow the "anak tiri" to have any important portfolio or anything to say with regards to activities in the bunglow house except to make money for the family.

So why is the "bapak tiri" now furious?
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 12
...
written by DORALL, May 28, 2008 11:30:42
The problem is a linguistic one.

The English language version of the document Baron von Overbeck signed on behalf of the North Borneo Company uses the word "cede", whereas the Malay language version signed by the Sultanate of Sulu uses the word "pajak."

In diplomatic correspondence with the heirs of the Sultanate of Sulu when paying the annual Ringgit 5000, Malaysia writes that this payment is "Cession Money."

It is truly ironical that Malaysian Government finds itself defending the ENGLISH language version of the document Overbeck signed, and the Philippine Goverment (and Philippine Muslims) are the ones defending the MALAY language version of that same document.

If this ever gets to the International Court of Justice, it will take more than a Solomon to decide if "cede" is correctly translated into Malay as "pajak."


Richard Dorall
University of Malaya (1972-2007),
specialising in the geo-politics of Philippine Minority Communities
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 11
...
written by KKchan, May 28, 2008 11:36:10
Nur Misuari biting that once fed him? Wasn't he a welcomed guest previously? I supposed he is now peeved that he was handed over to the Filipino authorities when he was caught in Sabah and had to spent time in the slammer. But why are we so reacting from a has-been in Filipino politics who hadn't the sense to become more than just the failed governor of a failed province? I have never come across an instance where an inhabited area has been handed over to a claimant, whatever the merits of the claim. Sabah is not Pulau Batu Puteh. Anyway we have bigger things to fry back home.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 4
...
written by Rohani Hitam, May 28, 2008 11:52:31
Malaysia should now conduct research and investigation to defend Sabah as one of our territory. The present AG should be tossed out first as his ascend was filled with controversy involving executive interference on his appointment and not through merit. His failure to advise accurately and adequately to the international lawyers had caused the lost of PBP.

This precedent of going through the ICJ can spur the rest of the claiments of our territory and Sabah seems very probable.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by sydput, May 28, 2008 11:59:06
So looks like the british had two agreement signed, one stating cede in english and another stating pajak in malay. So looks like Sultan of Sulu had just given away his rights to the land using the english version or he was cheated of the land as the malay vesion stated "pajak" which meant "lease".
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 4
...
written by glock17, May 28, 2008 12:01:03
Dear Ommnoputras....

Your racist-corruptive political manipulation via blind/narrow-minded ethno extreme nationalism had fail you again and again.

The pirate nation from a neigbouring which you have courted in the past to be part of your regime supporters is now turning against you and the local indigenous people of Sabah.

Now this pirate decesndants are armed with legitimate MyCArds and will intensify their effort to be reunited and symphatised with their Jolo brethrens. Omnoputra is irrelavant, Tun Musthapaha and Harris Saleh is no longer around to monitor this bunch of loose cannons, the innocent genuine people of Sabah are now paying for sins of Omnoutras racist governing policies as I type my 2 cents worth of thought..

Please take note. If the goverment dun buck-up now. We are in real deep shit!!!

Glock17
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 6
...
written by Arubin, May 28, 2008 12:05:24
If I recall my history lessons correctly, along with some light reading on my own on the internet, Malaysia actually has no more of a claim to Sabah than the Phillipines do.

The main reason why they're part of our country instead of Phillipines was because the Sabahans chose to join us instead.

I wonder they ever regretted that decision, with how the UMNO/BN government has been treating them. I wouldn't really blame them if they decide to join the Phillipines now instead. Malaysia has done nothing for them aside from exploiting their resources to develop the Peninsula.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 9
...
written by Saint, May 28, 2008 12:23:34
Dear Richard Dorall, what happens when I do not read, write and understand English and only understand Malay. Even Australian courts have accepted that the "lack of English language" is acceptable. Thus the Mulu Sultanate version of "pajak" is more accurate and should be acceptable. If I was the heir of the Mulu Sultanate I would try out this case in the ICJ, without requesting any claim over any Philippine territory. And if I really want to win the case, I might pay a visit to the Singapore foreign office. - Malaysia! please wake up.



report abuse
disagree 1
agree 7
...
written by pkler, May 28, 2008 13:33:01
Brilliant exposition Richard Dorall-why no one has ever explined it so succintly mystifies me.

written by KKchan, May 28, 2008 | 11:36:10

Nur Misuari biting that once fed him? Wasn't he a welcomed guest previously?


Under Tun Mustapha, yes.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by CVL, May 28, 2008 13:53:13
One of the seemingly furious Sabahan over this matter is that MP called Bung Mokhtar. In his furiousness, asked of the Malaysian government is for the setting up of a Philippine Consulate in Sabah, Daily Express today.

This simplistic and superficial concerns show thru for the fact this ‘consulate’ thing has been harped over many many times in the past, and the obvious reason why Philippine will not want to base one in Sabah.

Is it that difficult for a Sabah MP to be more pragmatic? And is this all BN has in their so called ‘ BN ways of solving the illegal migrant factor in Sabah’? Anifah Aman has been o nrecord saying ‘BN has their ways of solving …’ the factor.

Philippine will not set up a consulate in a land [Sabah] as Sabah [they claim] belongs them. Period.

What IQ Sabah’s export of MPs to the august house!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1
...
written by sang0kancil, May 28, 2008 13:59:17
"The English language version of the document Baron von Overbeck signed on behalf of the North Borneo Company uses the word "cede", whereas the Malay language version signed by the Sultanate of Sulu uses the word "pajak."

In diplomatic correspondence with the heirs of the Sultanate of Sulu when paying the annual Ringgit 5000, Malaysia writes that this payment is "Cession Money."
.

Rupa-rupanya Sabah itu negeri yang disewa daripada Kerajaan Sulu... Waduh2!!!

Untung bah Sabah... Negeri di bawah Sewaan.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by oster, May 28, 2008 14:02:29
Dear Richard Dorall,

That is a very fascinating historical snippet, one like many little details that have big implications.

From the ICJ's point of view though, this will probably create a legal deadlock, resolved only by other factors, such as Sabahan self-determination and how the ICJ would probably be highly reluctant in appropriating the citizenships of 2million Sabahans by a forceful ruling.

Sabah, for the foreseeable future, will remain in Malaysia and it will take a massive inertial force to change the status quo.

The main reason why they're part of our country instead of Phillipines was because the Sabahans chose to join us instead.


There was never a plebiscite, merely a survey of some sort on Sabahans (one which probably wasn't extensive).

Sabah never chose. In fact very few colonial former possessions actually chose which country they would be part of. That's why former colonial nations are so divided along sectarian lines (the Moros are part of the Phillippines because they were part of the Spanish dominions, Irian Jaya is in Indonesia by virtue of former Dutch control etc.). Sabah was incorporated in Malaysia simply because it was a tidy resolution to the relinquishing of all British Southeast Asia colonies.

cheers
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by kingelvis, May 28, 2008 14:30:11
Hasen't his group taken over Sabah already. I think it's called ..let me think...UMNO!!
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 2
...
written by Rainbowseahorse, May 28, 2008 14:43:42
written by kingelvis, May 28, 2008 | 14:30:11

Hasen't his group taken over Sabah already. I think it's called ..let me think...UMNO!!

Yes, UMNO indeed, which stands for: United Moro National Organization.

Haiyah, one of my brother-in-law was hanging out with that sucker pretender to the Sulu sultanate throne..not much more then a con-man and looking for easy hands out. He even met with the Sultan of Brunei...not sure if he got anything from the Brunei Sultan.

Regardless of legitimacy of the claim, the threat of violence in Sabah is real enough as the vast majority of those migrants in Sabah are from the Southern Philippines.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by mgeo, May 28, 2008 15:25:45
written by KKchan, May 28, 2008 | 11:36:10
Nur Misuari biting that once fed him?

He has splurged the RM 500 million or so Malaysia provided in the late 1990s for development of Mindanao. So much so that his people booted him out as Governor in the elections, leading to his doing an armed stand-off, refusing to vacate office, then going back to part-time terrorism...
So he is asking for more money lah.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by DORALL, May 28, 2008 15:52:23
"........(the Moros are part of the Phillippines because they were part of the Spanish dominions...."

The Moros were never part of Spanish Philippines, despite centuries of Spanish attempts to conquer the Southern Philippines. When the Spaniards were defeated by the Americans in 1898, in the Treaty of Paris in 1900 they signed over the Philippines to the Americans. The Americans wanted a MAP to go with the treaty, so the Spaniards drew a line in the Sulu Sea just off the cost of Sabah informing the Americans that to the east of that line was the territories they were surrendering to the Americans.

The until then independent Moros were shocked when the Americans duly showed up to take "possession", of what they Moros knew was never under Spanish rule, and war broke out between the Moros and the Americans that lasted till 1913, resulting in tens of thousands of mainly Moro deaths.

The Americans had to face attacks by Moro Juramentado (pronounced HURA-MEN-TAH-DOH), these being suicide attacks by individuals and even, as a last resot, entire villages (men, women and children, as when hundreds trapped in the extinct volcano of Bud Bagsak in Jolo, Sulu, launched the last mass Juramentado attack on the surrounding American troops, which resulted hundreds being shot to death as they streamed out of the volcano into withering American fire).

The American weaponry could not stop a Juramendado (today, we call then Jihadists), and the American Army had to invent the heavy caliber Army Colt 45 pistol, the so-called "man stopper" because only that bullet would drop the attacking Juramentado in his tracks.

Those were the first suicide attacks on the American occupiers of Muslim (Moro) land. One can only wonder why the Americans of today (in Iraq, notably) have not learned from their not that distant Philippine military past that Muslims do not take kindly to American military occupation of their land, and that they will fight back in the name of religion against the occupier, even in circumstances of certain death (the Juramentdo of the early 1990s, and today's suicide bombers).

Richard Dorall
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 2
...
written by eeyaw, May 28, 2008 15:57:53
If I may add on to Dorall's comments....

If a party pays regular definite amounts of annual rent wouldn't this be construed as a lease agreement? And the fact that the heirs to the Sultan of Sulu accepted the payments all these while wouldn't it falls under the definition of rent instead of outright sales? If the answer is affirmative, then there goes Sabah, so soon after Pulau Batu Putih.
I think Badawi's head is getting bigger by the days!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by Rundukon, May 28, 2008 16:56:38
It is interesting to see the actual size and the map of North Borneo that was given as a 'gift' by the then Brunei Sultan to Sultan Sulu.

The Phillipines nor Nur Misuari have no locus standi to lay claim on Sabah. If there is, it should be the Sultan Sulu himself. And if I m not mistaken there are at least 12 families laying claim on the Sultanate.

In order for the Phillipines to have the necessary locus standi, they must first recognise the existence of the Sulu Sultanate meaning there must be a reigning Sultan Sulu meaning they have to recognise the Kingdom of Mindanao or whatever.

Bring on the ICJ.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1
...
written by gorshan, May 28, 2008 17:31:27
1 million immigrant in Sabah courtesy of BN. 1 million immigrant gives birth to say 6 million babies all with mykad of course. 7 million immigrant with mykad voted against BN 20 years down the road and demand referendum for Sabah to leave Malaysia and join either Philippines or Indonesia. plausible scenario. and mahathir will cringe in his grave smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/angry.gif
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by RFernandez, May 28, 2008 18:05:33
Why must be furious, just do a referendum for Sabahans, ask them to choose lah. Simple what, why must 12 families from the Sulu Sultanate who have relinquished (cede) Sabah have any say in it nor claim over Sabah. What about the millions living there in Sabah, don't they have the right to determine their destiny? Why is Malaysia still paying for that "pajak", I say stop it, and tell the Sulu Sultan family to go fly kites lah. What can they do? By paying them Malaysia is just playing into their hands.

If we believe in Democracy, let the people of Sabah speak, they have done it before in 1963, let them do it again.

Meanwhile tell Misuari to shut up, he is a confirmed terrorist and law breaker anyway why are we worried nor take heed what he has to say.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by Sabahfan, May 28, 2008 22:19:18
smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif

In the Polipines, anything goes...

they have a president who can hardly talk english, ex actor, womaniser, ****er..
goes into jail for coruuption, goes out and can be president again...

he is one president who says......" a bacteria is d backdoor of a cafetaria"

" I been fingering your waitress and she not come..." ha ha ha ha "or cum"?

Now they are so awed over a Misuari, a fanatic so called moslem, probably keeps lots of women, drink wine etc. and juust rob his own citezen of everything...

Now wann claim sabah when we already got even Sipadan...

No dice mate..... going by the ICJs principle, if they have not been administrating for the past 50 years, on what grounds must we bow down to these bastards????
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by sampat, May 29, 2008 10:00:30
The Sabah people can't speak anymore... we are less than half of the total population. We can only hope that those immigrnats who have obtained their IC would not be dumb enough to vote for Sabah to be "given" to Sulu... think about it.. it would mean more of their brethens coming into Sabah, which equals to lesser job opportunities, less territory, more crime, and defeats their purpose of coming to Sabah for a better life.

BTW, The MILF and Abu Sayyaf are just using Islam as a front, they are now nothing more than power hungry robbers, looters, pillagers, kidnappers, rapists. The ex mayor Misuari stole so much money that even his OWN CITIZENS kicked him off, that's why he founded the MILF.. not to 'fight for Mindanao' or 'Islam'.. but for his own personal gain, so that he can continue to do what he did when he was mayor..basically to screw his own countrymen.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

Sponsored Links

World Futures  Moscow's Middle East conference: Should the Muslims depend only on the US to solve the Palestine crisis?

Future Fastforward  A controversial analysis by a controversial analyst, Matthias Chang, the lawyer-writer who unabashedly calls a spade a spade and offers no apology for doing so.

Internet TV 3000+ Channels  Pick your favorite internet TV channels straight to your PC! Yay!

Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM