|

The author of the e-mails also claimed that Islam that has evolved from 700 year ago is the devilish version of Islam. I am not sure what he/she means by this. Dr. Azly Rahman
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
http://azlyrahman-illuminations.blogspot.com/
 This week I received two interesting e-mails from a "self-proclaimed messenger/rasul/prophet" that I feel compelled to respond to. It was written in Bahasa Malaysia, sent to a few of the Malay traditional rulers, numerous Cabinet ministers and countless news agencies. I normally ignore this type of e-mail I receive by the hundreds but because they are unique and desperate, I am compelled to ask a few questions/seek clarifications.
Please correct me if in the course of extrapolating my thoughts, I erred.
Firstly I am honored that I got mail from one claiming to be a "prophet"/a bearer of good news for the entire of humankind."
Originally I wanted to ask the sender to take me off the e-mail group but this second e-mail written in desperation intrigues me. In America you say "Please take me off your call-list" and you're good for awhile.
Let me ask these questions and I hope they can be answered in the English Language since this self-proclaimed messenger of God had insisted that his/her message is to be heard and acted upon by the world and therefore I assume that he/she well-versed in the English language -- the lingua franca/language of international communication.
1. The sender made references to a scripture (or is it new revelations?) sent to him/her by the Creator. I am not aware of it and would be glad to read it if this text can make it available online.
I ask these questions: do you also have a CD-ROM version of it? Do you have a website? Only after one reads it will one be able to analyze the truth and falsehood of the text you claimed was revealed to you. I though there is no more message sent to Humanity. The most creative and productive period in the spiritual history of humanity I thought was during the Axial Age. I suggest this person find out what this age is about.
2. The author of the e-mails also claimed that Islam that has evolved from 700 year ago is the devilish version of Islam. I am not sure what he/she means by this. He/she did not elaborate on the genealogy of Islam, its message for humankind, and the phenomena of a message revealed to Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and how it has even inspired the European Renaissance. The prophet is revered by more than a billion Muslims. How could a message that has brought inner peace to such number of people in this world be called "devilish"? Does this mean that for 700 years have the adherents of Islam simply be relegated to being followers of a devilish religion?
3. In the e-mail there was also references to spitting on one's face. How could the sender, this "self-proclaimed" prophet "spit on his/her opposer's face" when prophets and messengers are supposed to be the most patient of all human beings. The history of Muhammad, Isa, Musa, Ibrahim, Noh (peace be upon them) - - rasul ulu'izmi (those who had to withstand sufferings, and the story of Siddhartha Gautama, Mahavira, Socrates, Lao Tzu, Chuan Tze, and many other philosophers and sages (peace to them too) are stories about patience in delivering their messages. Spitting on other people's face is not a mark of prophethood nor is it a good style of evangelism. Even prophet Isa/Jesus asked us to love our enemies.
4. To Muslims, Prophet Muhammad's (peace be upon him) message is considered the last of the revelations; one that validate other religious beliefs on the Oneness of the Creator. To be a Muslim (a person "evolving to become at peace with himself/herself") one must reflect upon this notion of prophethood. There is a lifetime given to learn what "know thyself and you will know thy Creator" means. Even contemplating upon the meaning of the Surah Al Fatihah (also called the "Opening" or the opening chapter of the Quran) may perhaps take one lifetime if one wishes to evolve as a thinking, feeling, and reflecting believer of Islam as a religion of peace.
Deep reflection and translating of the message of the Quran into practice -- these two are enough for one to feel a deep sense of humility and certainly avoid one from even thinking of spitting on faces. Furthermore, one cannot even comprehend the beauty of the word "Allah" in its totality if one ponders and begin to reflect with utmost humility the purpose of our existence through the power and profundity of the word -- rather that argue who in court should have the right to use the word. To many Muslim, even the word is so overwhelming and so profound that every breath on takes is a breath of remembrance of the inexplicability of such a profound feeling.
5. For those who follow the teachings of the last prophet, the world does not need any more "self-proclaimed prophets". The message is considered complete, with Prophet Muhammad, the will of the Divine, living a life to deliver the message in 23 years -- even giving a khutbah/sermon the year before he passed away. Muslims need to learn to evolve within the realm of the beauty of the message of Islam that (if one studies other religions and philosophies) incorporates the beauty of the teaching of other prophets, messengers, and sages.
Each one, regardless of what religion one is born into, must first and foremost become a messenger to our own self. Only then can religion be meaningful to one's existence and be a driving force for nations of religious believers to begin to respect the message of each other's religions.
The problem these days is that we are learning how to leap before knowing how to crawl and by those leaps we use to pound on each other. Ultimately one will find similarities more than differences, reconciliations more than confrontations, and universal values more than tribalistic proclamations if one take time to read the different scriptures with an open mind.
6. It is the Bush Regime in America that needs to be preached to, if the sender of those emails wishes to announce the urgency of his/her message. It is the "devilish acts" of destruction wrought upon the contemporary world especially in the total destruction of Iraq that need to be addressed by "any self-proclaimed prophet/rasul/messenger". I suggest the writer contact international news agencies to announce his/her prophethood and to lobby the American Congress in order to send a global message of what can be done to save the world.
7. In Islam where it concerns one's acquisition of knowledge and the dissemination of it, there is the idea of "siddiq, amanah, tabliq, fatanah" meaning that the truth that comes to one's consciousness if it need to be relayed to others, must be done wisely, and with the greatest degree of wisdom, One cannot hope to spread sacred words through the act of spitting on each other. That is bad religion. Prophets are reluctant human beings asked to carry the burden of the will of God, in order to save Humanity. They do not ask to be a messenger/rasul. But they carried out their responsibilities with the highest degree of wisdom. They do not take their potential believers by the throat and force then to believe that they are the chosen one. Hence their messages are timeless.
We need to look at the examples in history -- of the teachings of the prophets Ibrahim/Abraham, Daud/David, Musa/Moses, Jesus/Isa, and the last prophet Muhammad. Look at the message of sages such as Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Siddharta Gautama, Kabir, Guru Nanak, Valmiki, Vyasa, Kung Fu Tze, Lao Tzu, Gandhi, etc. -- these have stood the test of time. Even in Islam, the humility of the female Sufi practitioner Rabiatul Adawiyah is exemplary. Learn from all these and we will not need to force others to declare one as a new prophet. Within our inner world we can explore the beauty, the history, and the evidence of the evolutionary world outside. There is another universe inside that needs contemplation; a universe that the great scriptures talk about and explained in the Quran for Muslims to believe and to think deeply about. Similarly there are others universes and inner and outer worlds explained by each scripture of the different faith for Humanity to learn from.
How do we use Reason and Inner Sensibility to help us explore these creative interpretations of the Inner and Outer worlds? How do we philosophize religion? I will let the author of the email answer this.
I hope my brief public response, crafted with humility, is adequate to satisfy my urge to provide a perspective to this desperate attempt to the claim of prophethood/messengerhood. Again, religion need not be an opiate or a reason to spit on each other to convey one's own version of truth. It can be an antidote to ills created by Man himself/Women inflicted upon each other.
Religion is merely a logical structure of human experience vis-a-viz the Divine so that the human mind can explore the meaning of religious rituals and symbolism, the nature of existence, the meaning of God, the evolution of the self as it journeys, through Love and Compassion, toward the larger Self; evolving from truth to Truth. Religion provides the idea of how human beings ought to treat each other in this sea of Humanity and in this Ocean of mercy.
The sender of the email may respond in English if he/she wishes. But I suggest one read my article below on the need to philosophize religion and to tame the Desire to be arrogant.
With humility/Salam/Peace,
Azly Rahman ------------------------------ Let philosophy marry religion: An Invitation to an interfaith dialogue Dr. Azly Rahman
Humanity cannot live by bread or rice alone - it needs transcultural philosophy as a foundation of morality. The philosophical dimension of religion can be more powerful than its institutional and ritual. It should be through the philosophy of religion that one can explore the essence of the dialogue between what Hassidic philosopher Martin Buber calls, the "Thou and the I", the Ultimate Self and the Ultimate Reality, or between Man and Creator. This is what is meant by the transcultural nature of mystical discourse. Those familiar with Buber's philosophy will agree that the idea of the dialogical "I-Thou" contains a profound statement of Man's ontological vocation, a transcultural-philosophical view can best be an avenue which can appeal to educational philosophers intending to explore universality in mystical thoughts. For societies struggling to understand the potentials of an interfaith dialogue, this idea can be a good starting point for a powerful discourse. "Universalism" Let me illustrate some of the salient mystical ideas that correspond Buber's 'relational philosophy'; namely those from the Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, Taoist, and Islamic traditions. The transcultural dimension of I-Thou relation in the variety of religious experience points out to the Ultimate Reality and the illumination to self of which when this stage of enlightenment is achieved the "goodness" in Man is drawn out, Humanity reaches its moral epitome and the I-it world is imbued with the presence and vision of Thou-ness. In Christianity, it is the Jesus of Love and the love of Jesus, which runs through the idea of the setting of the precondition of the I's "meeting" with Thou. Humanity yearns for self-illumination and for the discovery of the inner beauty of self-government. St Francis Assisi's parable of the seeker of God and poor man of a church (the Master of his own kingdom) illustrates this point: "The Master asked… : Whence are you come? From God Where did you find God?' When I forsook all creatures When have you left God? In pure hearts and in sea of good will. The Master asked: What sort of man are you? I am a king. Where is your kingdom? My soul is my kingdom, so I can so rule my senses inwards and outward, that all the desires and powers of my soul are in subjection, and this kingdom is greater than a kingdom on earth. What has brought you to this perfection? My silence, my high thoughts, and my union with God. For I could rest in anything less than God. Now I have found and in God have eternal rest and peace." (Underhill, pp 209-210) In Buddhism, the Self acknowledges the Thou-ness of his/her existence through meditation and the following of the noble path in order for one to attain Nibbana. The I-it world can only reach salvation and prepare the meeting of the Thou through the Noble Eight-fold Path that leads to the cessation of suffering (Radhakrishnan & Moore, 1967) which among them call upon Man to: "know suffering, the origin of suffering, the cessation of suffering, and the path that leads to the cessation of suffering; … to renounce the world and to do no hurt or harm; … to abstain from lies and slander, from reviling, and from tattle; … to abstain from taking life, from stealing, and from lechery; … (p 277)" It is when these are taken to be a part of one's commitment to self-purification that the I-it world may be elevated to a higher level of consciousness. In the Hindu cultural philosophy, the I-Thou meeting can be preconditioned by Man's submission to the Law of Manu, a code of conduct written as metrical sutras of dealing with the religious, legal, customary, and political aspects of the Hindu philosophy . The purpose of life as conceived by the Hindus is to arrive at the fullest realisation of his/her existence through dharma (righteousness), artha (wealth), kama (enjoyment) and moksha (spiritual freedom) (Radhakrishnan & Moore, p 172) Man is to live anthromophically with Nature in a world wherein beings and non-beings have their significant in the cosmic and metaphysical order of creation. It is when the world is looked upon as an "It" - to be dominated - and peoples to be utilised that this order is violated and Mother Earth is raped and the cycle of destruction begins. In the Taoist tradition, the character of Lao Tze, controversial to many a Confucionist of his philosophy of Nature, is an epitome of the "Thou-ness" in thought. In Lao Tze, Nature is not to be tampered with at all, illustrative in his symbolic metaphor of the uncarved stone of which creativity of Man would carve into representations. If there should be a great grandfather of ecophilosophy, Lao Tze would be one. In one of the most foundational dialogues in the Taoist philosophical thoughts, in which Kung Fu Tze (Confucius) is said to visit Lao Tze to consult him in matters of propriety: Lao Tzu said: "Those of whom you talked about are dead and their bones are decayed. Only their words have remained. When the time is proper, the superior man rides in a carriage, but when it is not, he covers himself up and staggers away. I have heard that a good merchant stores away his treasures as if his store were empty and that a superior man with eminent virtues appear as if he were stupid. Get rid of your air of pride and many desires, your insinuating manners and lustful wishes. None of these is good for you. That is all I have to tell you. (translation, Chan, 196, p 36)
The essence of the passage and of Taoist philosophy is to live a life of humility through the subjugation of the Ego. It is this essence of naturalism in philosophical thought which has brought Lao Tze's mysticism comparable to Buber's "Thou-ness" in which nature is seen as one amongst the many beings in the world of the Thou. The Tao The Ching (The Way) is to be followed in order for Thou to meet the I in the Taoist tradition. The Islamic conception of mysticism must begin with the mentioning of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as one of the world's greatest mystic whose entire life was spent preaching the Thou-ness of living. Allah (God) is to be made present in the heart mind and soul of the believers so that the I-it world may become one in submission to the will of the Supreme Being. Peace for, oneself, for society, nations and the world order can be attained by adhering to the true spirit and meaning of the Quran. The mystical aspect of Islam nonetheless involves one to take the path to self-purification best illustrated by those "seeking God" through Sufism, among the paths. The writings and narrated experiences of poet mystics such as Qadir Jailani, Rabiyattul Adawiyah, Fariduddin Attar, Jalaluddin Rumi, Omar Khayyam, Al Ghazalli and of one widely recognised in the west, Idries Shah, illustrate the Thou-ness of the tradition. In the Malay world we find such work in the poet-mystics of the early Malay kingdom such as Hamzah Fansuri. The popular profound sayings of the Islamic mystics "know thyself and you will know God", and "God is closer to you than your jugular vein" has remarkable similarity with the Hassidic belief of the closeness of God to those who seeks to meet Him through his Grace. It is to be noted that Moses (PBUH) and Jesus (PBUH) are revered to be two of the major prophets of Islam and the monotheism in these two are but a continuation of the God's message brought also by Muhammad (PBUH) as the last prophet in the lineage of those beginning with Adam. Thus, the mysticism inherent in the religions I have scantily mentioned point out to the transcultural-philosophical paradigm inalienable to Buber's idea of I and Thou. It is my view thus that the inherent philosophical aspects of those religious traditions points out to the need for their believers to work towards peace from within the self so that this boundary can then be extended to others, to beings and non-beings and ultimately to the planet and cosmos in which then, we will realise that all there is the Thou of whom which we are to provide rendezvous. It is when the self is "immersed and lost" in the finiteness of the Thou that humanity can take its true character and that the ego is subjugated from its need to manifest all forms of behaviour and acts anathema to the Thou-ness of the I. "Politics and madness" Politics is said to be the art and science of constitutionalising and unconstitutionalising of power relations. It has been a predominant influence of the ego of Man and has crafted an iron curtain to veil the apolitical and beauty of the Inner self. Through politics of demagoguery, Man has created psychological, cultural, social, economic, political and global structures which mirror the triumphs of the ego over the primordially pure and peaceful self. This may perhaps explain the manifestations of mania/psychological derangement that have historically coloured our activities as human beings: The two World Wars, the war on terrorism, the illegitimate invasion of Iraq, slavery, the Holocaust, nuclear arms race, environmental degradations and destructions, and a range of other madness and disorders in the history of human civilisations. The "I" seeks power, seizes it and uses it to shackle the I-it primary word so that an I-Thou relation is no longer possible. The power sought is then used to subjugate others and to threaten Nature. The manifestations above point to the meaning of power in the realpolitik-al sense as opposed to the mystical. But a pertinent question which correlates with the Buberian and transcultural-philosophical view of power is this: How can the Self be made to realise its infinite power within? How do we evolve - from "man" to metaphysical beings? How do we evolve - as the Malays would say - from "manusia" to "insan" to "insanul Kamil"? — so that the larger Inner world harmonises with the smaller one Outside?
References Buber, M (1958). I and Thou. New York: Collier Books. Chan, W-T. (1963). Translation - The Way of Lao Tzu (Tao the ching). New York: Bobbs-Merrill Co. Radhakrishna, S & Moore, C.A.E. (Eds) (1967). A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Underhill, E (1955). Mysticism. New York: Meridian.
|