A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow Special Reports arrow Mahathir - true to form

Mahathir - true to form PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Friday, 23 May 2008 08:58

By Koh Kok Wee

WHEN Malaysia's former premier Mahathir Mohamad announced he was quitting Umno, the move was almost like a repeat of the old ploy to 'oust the chief'.

In 1969, Parti Perikatan, the precursor of Barisan Nasional (BN), also suffered a major setback in the general election, losing its two-thirds majority in Parliament and the state of Penang.

This year, BN lost its two-thirds majority in the same fashion, plus five states.

After the May 13, 1969 racial riots, Tun Dr Mahathir wrote a fiery letter to then prime minister Tunku Abdul Rahman urging him to step down.

Following the widespread distribution of this 'confidential letter' to the public, the people staged demonstrations demanding the Tunku's resignation.

Dr Mahathir was subsequently sacked from the Umno Supreme Council. A year later, a dejected Tunku also stepped down.

This year, although Dr Mahathir bore the halo of a former prime minister, he was just an ordinary party member. Through the media, websites, his blog and public speeches, he lambasted Datuk Seri Abdullah Badawi, calling him to step down. Now, instead of waiting for Umno leaders to deal with him, he made the announcement himself that he was leaving the party and called on other party leaders to follow suit.

Bukit Bendera MP and current affairs commentator Liew Chin Tong once described Dr Mahathir as 'an old hand at ousting the chief'.

He further alleged that Dr Mahathir had once sought also to oust Malaysia's third prime minister Tun Hussein Onn.

This time, Dr Mahathir tossed an 'atomic bomb' at Umno to express his lack of confidence in Mr Abdullah by quitting the party and urging other leaders and grassroots members to do the same.

Dr Mahathir's third call for an ouster is more intense and more thrilling than the previous ones. He has locked on to Mr Abdullah as his target, and there is absolutely no room for mediation.

Dr Mahathir joined Umno in 1946, and in 1981 took over from Tun Hussein Onn as the leader of Umno and prime minister.

He remained in power until 2003, when he handed the reins to Mr Abdullah.

The hostility between the two men was triggered by the abolishment of plans to build the crooked 'scenic bridge'.

But the ticking bomb had probably been already planted after the release of former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim.

BN's crushing defeat in this year's elections might have presented Dr Mahathir with an opportunity, but what has made the 83-year-old, who has undergone heart surgery, risk all to stand in the line of fire once again?

Observers believe Dr Mahathir's hardline approach, which also puts his youngest son Mukhriz's political future at stake, is linked to the conclusion from the probe on the judge-fixing video clip by the Abdullah administration, which recommends investigating Dr Mahathir and five others.

Dr Mahathir has not let up in his criticism of Mr Abdullah's administration since 2005.

On the eve of the Umno general assembly in 2006, there was even a rumour alleging that Umno wanted to purge Dr Mahathir from the party, but this eventually fizzled out.

Recently, Dr Mahathir even made a bold projection that no one would challenge the current chairman, Mr Abdullah, in the December party elections, and hence Mr Abdullah would gain victory by a walkover.

Perhaps Dr Mahathir saw that the effect of the general election setback had petered out over time, Umno was stabilising internally, and party leaders would be moving according to the 'handover timetable'.

When that time comes, it might be hard for him to stir up any waves.

But it still remains to be seen whether other Umno leaders will take Dr Mahathir's side this time. There is also a high chance that the de facto leader of Parti Keadilan Rakvat, Datuk Seri Anwar, is lurking in the background.

This fight to the finish - no matter who emerges the winner - will likely bring forward succession in Umno.

Translated by Lee Choo Kiong.

This commentary first appeared in Nanyang Siang Pau.

 


'Observers believe Dr Mahathir's hardline approach, which also puts his youngest son Mukhriz's political future at stake, is linked to the conclusion from the probe on the judge-fixing video clip by the Abdullah administration, which recommends investigating Dr Mahathir and five others.'

Comments (4)Add Comment
...
written by oster, May 23, 2008 09:33:17
In 1969, Mahathir lost his seat, partially by his own faults, and went on to blame the UMNO leadership.

In 2008, Mahathir's previous policies contributed greatly to governmental dysfunction and BN's subsequent performance deficit, and he went on the blame the UMNO leadership.

Mahathir, it seems, can never be wrong, so long as he controls the leadership.

cheers
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 9
...
written by TWOG, May 23, 2008 09:44:23
written by oster, May 23, 2008 | 09:33:17
In 1969, Mahathir lost his seat,

In 2008, Mahathir lost his pants , entirely by his own faults, and went on to blame the UMNO leadership.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 14
...
written by NSTPravda, May 23, 2008 10:27:45
Canines, ever loyal to their master, stand where their masters stood
While rats, every ready to consume, slink by where there is food
UMNO has the best menagerie that our money can buy
Without money would any of these folks be your ally?

The old man’s political instincts have gone haywire
Now his attempt to garner forces will surely backfire
His machination is crude and his call is hollow
With his credibility gap, who would believe him to follow?

His previous excesses are now coming home to roost
This inevitably has given his nemeses a tactical boost
This is a battle he will find hard to win
As the patience of the rakyats is wearing thin.

Please do not disrupt the nation anymore
You have foisted on us misdeeds galore
Please go quietly and retire in a dignified way
As it goes, you might not live enough to fight another day.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 7
...
written by TWOG, May 23, 2008 10:30:49
written by oster, May 23, 2008 | 09:33:17
In 1969, Mahathir lost his seat, partially by his own faults, and went on to blame the UMNO leadership.

He lost his seat, because just before the election, he told the Chinese that he does not need Chinese votes to win the election. The rest is history...
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 12

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

Sponsored Links

World Futures  Moscow's Middle East conference: Should the Muslims depend only on the US to solve the Palestine crisis?

Future Fastforward  A controversial analysis by a controversial analyst, Matthias Chang, the lawyer-writer who unabashedly calls a spade a spade and offers no apology for doing so.

Internet TV 3000+ Channels  Pick your favorite internet TV channels straight to your PC! Yay!

Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM