A+ | A- | Reset
Home

A two-party system for Malaysia? PDF Print
Friday, 04 April 2008 10:18

The creation of a formal opposition coalition, and a weakened BN, makes for such a scenario

Today Online

FOR HALF a century since independence, the Barisan Nasional (BN) - Malaysia's ruling coalition of 14 political parties - has dominated parliament. Now, the days of a dominant-party system may be numbered.

In the recent March polls, BN suffered its worst electoral defeat since 1957. Not only was it denied the crucial two-thirds parliamentary majority it needed to make constitutional changes, BN also lost five out of 13 states to the opposition, which used to control only one.

Just how real then is the likelihood of a two-party state in Malaysia?

After the opposition's sweep of much of Malaysia's west coast, even sceptics would be wary of dismissing this scenario.

Here, the views of Tawfik Tun Dr Ismail, a former BN parliamentarian in Johor, are telling.

The son of Malaysia's former Deputy Prime Minister Tun Dr Ismail Abdul Rahman told reporters on Tuesday at the sidelines of an Institute of South-east Asian Studies forum in Singapore that a two-party system is not untenable.

Recent developments lend credence to the two-party scenario, but the surest sign must be the birth of Malaysia's new opposition coalition, Pakatan Rakyat or People's Alliance.

Yes, it may have been formed on April Fools' Day, but it’s coming into being is not something to be laughed at.

Especially since this is the second attempt by Malaysia's three opposition parties - Parti Keadilan Rakyat, Democratic Action Party (DAP) and Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS) - to  officially band together.
 
In 1999, the trio came together to form Barisan Alternatif, or Alternative Front, to break BN's political hegemony, but disagreements then between PAS and DAP on the issue of the Islamic state led to BA unravelling some two years later.

Then came Mr Anwar Ibrahim, former Deputy Prime Minister, who managed to bridge the ideological rift between the two parties.
 
Now, Mr Anwar - whom some analysts had dismissed as a "spent force" - has graduated from being the de facto leader of Keadilan to the de facto leader of Pakatan.

But will debates on the Islamic state - once a central political philosophy of PAS- resurface as a divisive force?

A confident Mr Anwar does not think so. He told reporters during the coalition's launch: "It was not mentioned in the PAS (election) manifesto and has not been mentioned for a long time. It is no longer an issue."

But his word can only carry so much weight; it is still the PAS leaders who hold the key to Pakatan's shelf life.

In this light, it is perhaps noteworthy that while clerics such as Abdul Hadi Awang and Nik Aziz Nik Mat still occupy PAS'  top two positions, the party's second-tier leadership is manned by progressives like vice-president Husam Musa, who holds  an economics degree from Universiti Malaya, and youth chief Salahuddin Ayub, a former bank officer who was also trained secularly.

As long as PAS maintains this mix of clerics and progressives, the party will not dwell on its Islamic state rhetoric as the run-up to the recent polls proved.

Many did not expect PAS to field a non-Muslim candidate in the form of Ms Kumutha Rahman, a 29-year-old law graduate who is an ethnic Indian.

So Pakatan's message to voters is resoundingly clear: We made a mistake, we learned, and now we're back as a stronger force.

On the contrary, BN's message to voters must read a tad dodgier: We lost, we bicker, and now we do not know who is boss.

The ruling coalition's facade of a united stand in the face of its poor election performance - with heavyweight ministers like Hishamuddin Hussein and Najib Abdul Razak expressing full confidence in the premiership of Mr Abdullah Ahmad Badawi (Pak Lah) - is now withering by the day as factions emerge within the United Malays National Organisation (Umno), a key component of BN.

Umno veteran Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, or Ku Li, looks set to launch an offensive against Mr Abdullah in a much-anticipated Ku Li-Pak Lah clash for the party's top position at the Umno general assembly in December.

Whether BN can regain the trust of voters is dependent on whether its members can agree on who will be boss. Till then, a weakened BN - and a stronger Pakatan - could only signal that the winds of change in Malaysia could give rise to a two-party state.
Comments (11)Add Comment
...
written by CitizenBodohland, April 04, 2008 10:21:18
Malaysia is still not a two-party state but a two-coalition state. Long way to go.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 6
...
written by cabearth, April 04, 2008 10:33:47
I think if we let Syariah be applied only to Muslims, there will be no problem, except to the small secular minority of Malaysia.

As it is now, the system is in effect. We have Syariah courts and we have civil courts. And no one is making any noise.

As far as Islamic state is concerned, i advocate a referendum solution, not limited to party political dicipline.

Let the people decide whether they want Malaysia to be an Islamic state or not and not the political parties.

It is safer that way.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 4
...
written by My2Sens, April 04, 2008 10:52:09
BN's message to voters must read a tad dodgier: We lost, we bicker, and now we do not know who is boss.

Lol, that nails it on the spot.
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 1
...
written by taufan, April 04, 2008 10:54:50
Pakatan Rakyat or PR.

Say Pakatan Rakyat if calling it in Bahasa, and just 'PR' if in English.

'PR', a very fitting acronym, as it is also popularly used for Public Relations. This is what it is all about, really.

So please keep this name at all cost.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by loosecannon, April 04, 2008 12:17:49
Looking back at our past history, a two-party system is not only a possibility but a must now. We don't need another BN style of majority government where the constitutions are thrown to the dogs and abuses and corruption are order of the day. Even shaming them is no longer effective. That's how crude they have become.

A two-party ststem where no one party can change the constitution at will can safeguard our civil rights and stop most forms of abuses. Let's hope that henceforth, Malaysians will not allowed any one party to have a majority of more that 2/3. Hold the power in our own hands, not to politicians.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by wartank, April 04, 2008 12:49:27
Well, the system is long overdue. So much so that certain parties felt this will never happen. Widespread abuses of all thing democratic had proven this to be so.
The Pakatan Rakyat had been aptly named, as opposed to B.N. which should be called 'UMNO dan kuncu2nya, MCA,MIC,Gerakan..dll' (Si Luncai dgn labu2nya came to mind) all along. PKR/DAP/PAS at this moment, seem to be a more cohesive and fair unit.
This seemed a small step towards a Democratic Malaysia.. and a big leap for freedom, fairness and liberty for Malaysians!
The power of the people and the term "There's strength in numbers" had never been so evident till now.
So, onwards people of Malaysia!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by panca, April 04, 2008 15:19:18
In 1999, the trio came together to form Barisan Alternatif, or Alternative Front, to break BN's political hegemony, but disagreements then between PAS and DAP on the issue of the Islamic state led to BA unravelling some two years later.

Then came Mr Anwar Ibrahim, former Deputy Prime Minister, who managed to bridge the ideological rift between the two parties.


But all in all, the GE12, showed the power of the Rakyat supports The campaign for a Clean, Fair and Just Government with the political awakening put down bn. The People's Power is to be reckoned with, very potent that dismantle and dislodge any bad gomen. It's the PEOPLE'S OMEN.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1
...
written by chin, April 04, 2008 16:40:58
I doubt BN will be able to mount much of a challenge if Pakatan play their cards right.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1
...
written by sampalee, April 04, 2008 18:35:25
The goal of bersih is still unfullfilled.Many of us have sacrificed to give the movement life.With PR,we must make our final push to make free and fair election a reality.Our problem seem to be caught in the euphoria of this major gain by PR and have forgotten,we have STILL to reach our goal.Strike while the going is good.Wait no more or complacency will set in.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1
...
written by EYFF, April 05, 2008 00:32:16
In a pig's eye!

The Malay ultras sized power from Tunku in UMNO and control to this day. It will not and cannot change.

For their survival MCA, Gerakan and MIC should take the initiative and form a NEW BN! Then UMNO can decide whether it want to change and survive or go into oblivion!

Heh! MCA, MIC an Gerakan wake up and be counted. Get rid of the dead wood or party if you wish to thrive!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by Eskay Lim, April 06, 2008 22:10:22
It has been a long 50 years for Umno & her communal partners that transformed Malaysia, a country rich in natural resources like oil, tin & timber, into a 3rd-world country because of their leaders with 3rd-class mentality.
Since the March-8 polls, the time is right for the country to put into effect a 2-party system. With the official formation of the Pakatan Rakyat, BN will have to reform as well to meet the challenges of the future. The "voice of the people" had spoken loud & clear that they want a real democracy that can only be provided for in a 2-party system..... No more guided democracy under the present system.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
The Silent Roar
 BUY THE BOOK HERE
 **STOCKS NOW AVAILABLE**
 
** SPONSORED LINKS **
Will NATO become a global army? More..
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA
People's Declaration

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM