A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow Guest Columnists arrow BN 'made big mistake with early polls and media attacks on Anwar'

BN 'made big mistake with early polls and media attacks on Anwar' PDF Print
Thursday, 13 March 2008 10:49

Active Image

Another move that contributed to the BN's massive losses, said Dr Farish, was the decision to scrap the use of indelible ink, which had been aimed at curbing people from voting more than once.

Both strategies backfired and helped Anwar gain support for opposition: Experts

By Zackaria Abdul Rahim, THE STRAITS TIMES

THE ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition might have been able to prevent its election disaster had it let former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim run, a panel of experts in Singapore said yesterday.

Holding elections early allowed the charismatic opposition leader to roam round the country stumping for the opposition instead of being tied down to campaigning for himself in one constituency, they said.

That 'fundamentally flawed strategy' contributed to the big swing against the BN at the polls, concluded the panel at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS) at Nanyang Technological University.

After his imprisonment for corruption, Datuk Seri Anwar was barred from holding public office until April 15. Thus he was free to campaign anywhere; he even gave a speech at a financial conference in Singapore last Wednesday, just days before the election.

The visit gave the government more fodder for the anti-Anwar campaign it conducted in the country's pro-government newspapers.

'Perhaps, for the Malay Muslim electorate, a certain sensitivity has been touched because this was a man who had been put in jail, beaten up by the IGP (Inspector-General of Police) of Malaysia,' said Dr Farish Noor, Senior Fellow at RSIS. 'He had been demonised in the media, and then there was this unrelenting attack on Anwar Ibrahim for four days.'

Voters in Kelantan and Terengganu receive only Berita Harian and Utusan newspapers, he noted.

'And the attacks in Utusan and Berita Harian took up half the contents of each paper,' he said.

'When you heap this relentless barrage of abuse on Anwar Ibrahim, without giving him a chance to even reply, the sympathy simply swung in his favour.'

Other members of the panel, chaired by Associate Professor Joseph Liow, RSIS' head of research, were: Professor Shamsul A.B., founding director of the Institute of Ethnic Studies at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia; RSIS' senior fellow, Mr Yang Razali Kassim; and Ms Jacqueline Ann Surin, former Sun journalist and founder of the website malaysiavotes.com.

Another move that contributed to the BN's massive losses, said Dr Farish, was the decision to scrap the use of indelible ink, which had been aimed at curbing people from voting more than once.

'This immediately sent out a very clear message to a lot of the supporters of PAS (Parti Islam SeMalaysia) and the opposition in particular that there is going to be massive vote-rigging, so you better go out and vote,' he said. 'Perhaps, it made the pro-government supporters a bit more lax.'

The presence of Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi's son-in-law Khairy Jamaluddin on the campaign circuit may have also backfired.

Dr Farish said that Mr Khairy, as the Umno deputy Youth chief, is projected as a role model for young Malaysians, but he really epitomises the gap between 'rich and poor' families.

'(So), some of the PAS leaders were quite happy when Khairy came to Kelantan,' he explained.

Thus, the panel yesterday agreed, the combined anger of not just the Chinese and Indians, but also the Malays, hurt the BN.

'It is quite clear it is the Malay backlash that pulled down the BN,' said Prof Shamsul.

He added that while Chinese voters are touchy about language, culture and education, Malay voters are protective of morality and Islam.

'It is quite interesting that the Malays have decided that the BN is not good morally and it doesn't look after Islam, and that's why we don't want you,' he said.

Dr Farish said that the Malay Muslim electorate has rejected the concept of Islam Hadhari promoted by Datuk Seri Abdullah in 2004.

He said that ordinary Malays see Islam Hadhari as building a 'RM250 million (S$109 million) Islamic theme park', - an allusion to the extravagant Crystal Mosque in Terengganu.

He showed a photo of a poster put up by PAS outside the mosque, which read: 'Never before this has a RM250 million mosque been built only for tourists. This is Islam Hadhari.'

Another poster reminded the electorate that Umno had destroyed mosques in the past.

Dr Farish interpreted the voters' thoughts as: 'Why should we build a mosque just to attract tourists. We want it for us.'

Yet another poster, with the tagline of Islam Hadhari, highlighted the social ills that have plagued Malaysia's Malays: Mat Rempit (biker gang), teenage couples holding hands, gangsterism in school, alcohol consumption and smoking.

Comments (15)Add Comment
...
written by Bill Gates, March 13, 2008 11:24:13
Of course BN will lose because they ise pariahs like Chandra and Nallakarupan. Who are these people compared to Anwar? They should use TDM instead but unfortunately the old man turned the table around and ask voters to vote our Samy and Bodohwi.
report abuse
disagree 3
agree 11
...
written by Clip Max, March 13, 2008 12:02:00
They good news is that the opposition has won. The better news is that they must keep up to their promises and execute them before the 13th GE. The best news of all is that we can switch back to BN if the opposition does not deliver. PEOPLE POWER.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 12
...
written by MalaysianIAm, March 13, 2008 12:07:15
please tell me something i don't already know.

DUH!
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 2
...
written by sampalee, March 13, 2008 12:34:47
The academician are only right on the surface.The real reason is people are getting to hear the truth from cyber space.Portal like Malaysia Today have been waking up the rakyat enmass,daily , quitely and patiently liberating the people's mind from yeras of indoctrination on a single diet of racial politic.RPK is a ONE man machine that dismantle bn division along racial lines.As for those who use the holy religion for personal agenda[as in the case of Islam had-hari]the harvest is clearly obvious.We are all ONE in God's eye,so let no one F around,with or without clever comment on the will of god.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 5
...
written by NSTPravda, March 13, 2008 12:35:34
“Early polls and media attacks on Anwar” were BN’s big mistake
They also thought the Rakyats, like their leader, is only half awake
In the end their arrogance and corruption lost them the day
They bought their own propaganda that incompetence is semua-nya OK!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 5
...
written by SUV, March 13, 2008 12:43:30
aiyaah,sulah lupakah,itu 3 china feng shui ciakap pak lolah minan kalo pili 8 halibulan..aah,balisan lakyat lagi power dali itu cinah peng talak sui
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 4
...
written by Malay Ultraman, March 13, 2008 12:48:58
oppositon winning has nothing to do with anwar's sympathy. Nor it has anything to do with the strengtening of pas, pkr or dap. Even putting a tunggul kayu would make opposition a bigger winner. This is very much something to do with weak BN leadership starting from the worst leader of all Pak Lah and Son in Law. Rakyat are fed up with pak lah. The only thing he deserves to do now is to step down and retire from politics. He is much more qualified to be imam kampung.....
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 8
...
written by densemy, March 13, 2008 12:52:18
Also BN's lapdog the MSM failed them dismally.

The censorship of any criticism of the government through the media lead BN to believe that everything in Malaysia was running smoothly

The naively and egotistically believed that there were only a few bloggers out there in 'reality land' who were against them
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 7
...
written by Namaste, March 13, 2008 13:17:20
Always remember that Politicians have short memories. TDM is worried on Anwar’s progress as he has the keys to all locks. For Najib, he has to toe the line until Altantunya’s case is resolved. Let us think outside the box as to why Pak Lah let Anwar free? Why did he chose call for GE at the time of many controversies? He is smart in a way to clean up the deadwood, corrupt, cronies, racist, rapist, etc etc who lost their seat and now all are caught with their pants and panties down except for one who died. UMNO is weak and divided in the inside with camps of Pak Lak, Najib, Mahanthir and Anwar.

The reality about Indians is that they are divided many more folds then all races put together. Do you know we have Indians in MIC, Gerakan, PPP, IPF, the newly stupid group of Nallakarapan, DAP, PKR and even PAS. Frankly we cannot do much for Indians if Samy Vellu and his thug force exist but only deteriorate further by the day. I wonder what Subra can do except to patronise PUBs to unite Indians in wonder land. Do you think they can be united?

Let us learn from Ghandhi who alone united the Indians because he was a Mahatma and through a universal force India got independent. He fought with ahimsa or non violence because the British have conscience within them but not with Indians. Here TDM is right that you will see more polical parties fo 1.8 million Indians.

Even in Maika AGM, SV and his Thug Force instill horror when jutification is raised. This is the level of Indians in MIC until HINDAF took to the streets because the NON MIC Indians completetly lost out to the greed of UMNO who hijacked NEP for UMNOPUTERAS only. Do you think this is what we Indians wanted if MIC and BN had done their job and in one voice? Think

The same is now brewing with the oppositions whom we all elcted for change but greed for power and representations are being capitalised by Govt. control media to fuel feud among the newly formed coalition of PAS/PKR/DAp. We can only hope for all BA parties to stay united and as Malaysians, move on to bring better governance in these 5 states where the rakyat has given the mandate to deliver for the betterment for all Malaysians.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 7
...
written by apanama, March 13, 2008 13:41:13
i went back to vote. crossed border, 5 hours on the road, petrol not cheap. what the heck. they put lingam cameraman i don't even know, they put a blogger, i don't even know, they put so many newcomers, people also dunno. they just pangkah opposition. that's the seething anger on the ground. after two days, i went back to work, crossed border again, paid tolls again, and refilled my petrol tank. it was all worth it.

the PM can continue to find another 3 new wives. he can continue to sleep on the job. he can continue to snatch bodies and kept quiet. he can buy another yacht, another airbus maybe. he can continue to keep his home ministry, finance ministry, and maybe usurp local govt and housing (plus that health ministry in tow), and work ministry. and also hey, the information ministry.

the truth is, he is not capable. he couldn't care about the people. he couldn't care about corruption. he couldn't care about judicial rot. so he will rot, abetted by rotten folks already rejected by the people, to his grave. full stop.

report abuse
disagree 0
agree 12
...
written by cocomomo, March 13, 2008 13:49:52
All members of MIC, IPF, MCA, Gerakan , PPP etc should seriously consider abandoning these race based parties(even though some claim to be multiracial) and join the PKR or the DAP. Preferably over time PKR and DAP should also merge if the DAP is unable to become a more truly mutiracial party with more Malay members on its own. UMNO members who are sincere in seeing a truly harmonious Malaysia where we are identified as MALAYSIANS and not Malays, Chinese, Indians, Dayaks , Kadazandusun etc should also abandon UMNO and join a mutiracial party .
Let the leaders of all the bn components then sit down and wonder what happened or what went wrong as many of them are still arrogant and in denial.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by asguard, March 13, 2008 15:45:12
What can be say of malaysian politics now is at very threshold opening new possibilities new area... starting new policy and the same time dealing with after shock wave that come all the way... but in nut shell no body is perfect.. but strive as human being to corrected mistakes from time to time...
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by Bennyloh, March 13, 2008 21:08:44
He's a nobody...
http://malaysiancartoons.*****...akini.html
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by Anti Relon, March 14, 2008 00:29:44
From
The Independent (UK) 13 March 2008
Independent.co.uk
Johann Hari: What wouldn't Clinton do to secure power? (1)
Thursday, 13 March 2008


Haven't we seen this movie before? Barack Obama has just proved his chasm-wide appeal again by conquering another Republican-red state – Mississippi – yet the battle for the Democratic nomination is set to stretch out on to the far horizon. As the comedian Bill Maher says, in a reference to John McCain's age, "It's a bad sign when the Democratic campaign is set to last longer than the Republican nominee." But the looming ending to this story feels flatly familiar – like a slo-mo remake of Florida in the year 2000.


It is clear the Clintons are determined to get this nomination, any way, any how. If they have to do it by falsely claiming to have won states like Florida and Michigan – where Obama's name wasn't even on the ballot, because there was an agreement by all the candidates to punish the states for holding early primaries – then they will. If they have to do it by overturning the will of the Democratic electorate by appealing to the unelected super-delegates – a group of party functionaries who seem likely to hold the balance – then they will. If they have to do it by pandering to racist sentiments – dismissing Obama as akin to the black firebrand Jesse Jackson, or by leaking images of Obama in African tribal dress – then they will do it.

Some American liberals have been suddenly, violently disillusioned by the Clintons' tactics over the past few months. But in reality, for people who could see beyond political tribalism, the nature of the Clintons has been plain for a long time.

The idea that Clinton was "the first black President" was always implicitly racist: so screwing around, riffing well in speeches and liking fried chicken makes you black now? In fact, Bill Clinton was prepared to lash black people whenever it was politically convenient, with the quiescence of Hillary. Just after receiving the Democratic nomination for President, Governor Clinton returned to Arkansas to authorise the execution of a black man, Ricky Ray Rector, who was so profoundly mentally disabled that he told the guards to keep his last meal so he could have it tomorrow.

Attacking blacks when an election neared became a habit: in 1996, Clinton signed a package of welfare reform that effectively abolished benefits for poor women after a two-year time-limit. They are disproportionately black – and as a recession hits now, they will suffer severely.

Of course you have to make compromises to achieve power. But at some point, on some issues, you have to say – no, I can't. I can't execute this mentally disabled black guy. I can't plunge millions of kids into poverty. I can't still insist I was right to back the war in Iraq, when it has killed more than 650,000 Iraqis. The Clintons don't have that gagging reflex.

Instead, they chose to turn themselves into weathervanes, pointing whichever way the winds of mega-power blow them. This meant that on all the great issues of their time – global warming, spiralling inequality, the foolish "war on drugs" – the Clintons fed and fuelled the right. Hillary is following this approach to the letter. While promising in public to "take on the oil companies, the pharmaceutical companies", she is in fact shovelling more of their cash into her campaign than any other candidate, Democrat or Republican. Fortune magazine recently ran an adoring cover story calling her "the candidate of business".


This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by Anti Relon, March 14, 2008 00:31:25
From
The Independent (UK) 13.3.2008
Independent.co.uk
Johann Hari: What wouldn't Clinton do to secure power? (2)
Thursday, 13 March 2008

Why did it take us so long to see them for what they are? Partly, it is because the Clintons were blessed with a parade of even greater grotesques as enemies. The right couldn't attack the Clintons on their genuine scandalous behaviour, because they supported it all: the executions, the abolition of benefits, the crackdowns. So they contrived nonsense scandals, like Whitewater and Monicagate. Today, many of them are serving up stale sexism against Hillary: right-wing host Tucker Carlson has announced, "There's something about her that feels castrating, overbearing and scary."

And partly, it is because the nightmare of the Bush years has made even the Clinton years seem like a halcyon heyday.

Think about the symbolism for the watching world if the Clintons manage to snatch this nomination. The people in a majority of states in America will have shown they are ready to embrace a black man as President – only for some white guys in suits to hand it to the wife of the ex-President. Their arguments in their own defence will seem feeble. The idea that Hillary is more "experienced" seems to me both anti-feminist and untrue. How does being married to a man make you "experienced" in his job? As the stand-up comedian Chris Rock said in a recent gig, "I don't get it. I've been married for 10 years – but if my wife came out here on stage now, you wouldn't laugh."

I am not starry-eyed about Barack Obama. He wouldn't have been my choice for nominee – I was a John Edwards man – and he has made plenty of ugly compromises himself. To give just one example: in 2005, he voted for the Class Action Fairness Act, which stripped away the ability of ordinary citizens to seek compensation from huge corporations. There was only one group who wanted this: the CEOs of the very Wall Street mega-firms that Obama takes millions from in practice today.

But there is considerable evidence that President Obama would be more susceptible to pressure from progressives than Hillary. To pluck one policy area: Bill Clinton increased jail terms for drug possession, creating a situation where one in nine black men between the age of 20 and 35 is now in prison at any given time. Obama, by contrast, was arguing for the full decriminalisation of marijuana as recently as 2004, and has refused to indulge in this deranged tough-on-crime escalation.

If the Clintons prevail, there will be a worse effect still: the US will be much more likely to have another Republican President. Most major polls show Obama is more likely to beat John McCain. The Republicans are desperate for a Hillary candidacy, knowing it is the one thing that can unite their base behind McCain. The far-right radio hosts Rush Limbaugh and Laura Ingraham have begged their listeners to go out and vote for her in the Democratic primaries; the National Review ran a front-page pleading, "Please vote for this woman".

Hillary would be unable to make an election issue out of McCain's greatest weakness – his support for the invasion of Iraq – because she (like me) made the same dumb mistake. She would have to fall back on reinforcing right-wing ideas by bragging about her "toughness". The enthusiasm Obama has stirred among first-time voters would leech away.

With their latest lunge at power, the Clintons have shown us how they should be remembered when the end credits roll – as a greasy stain on the bright blue dress of the Democratic Party.

This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it

report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

Sponsored Links

World Futures  Moscow's Middle East conference: Should the Muslims depend only on the US to solve the Palestine crisis?

Future Fastforward  A controversial analysis by a controversial analyst, Matthias Chang, the lawyer-writer who unabashedly calls a spade a spade and offers no apology for doing so.

Internet TV 3000+ Channels  Pick your favorite internet TV channels straight to your PC! Yay!

Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM