A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow News/Commentaries arrow Malaysia's highest court rejects plea to block divorce case from going to Islamic court

Malaysia's highest court rejects plea to block divorce case from going to Islamic court PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Thursday, 27 December 2007 14:26

PUTRAJAYA, Malaysia (AP) - Malaysia's highest court Thursday rejected on technicality a Hindu woman's plea to stop her Muslim-convert husband from divorcing her in an Islamic court, and upheld the man's right to change their son's religion to Islam.

The Federal Court's verdict was on a petition by Subashini Rajasingam, a 29-year-old ethnic Indian Hindu,
who also wants the divorce but says it should be decided in a civil court.


However, in a confusing verbal ruling, the Federal Court failed to clarify the status of Malaysia's minorities, such as Subashini, in marital disputes where the spouse is a Muslim. Civil rights groups have voiced fears that minority rights have become subordinate to Islamic jurisprudence in this predominantly Muslim nation, thanks to a series of rulings that have gone in favor of Muslim spouses.

The Federal Court said that as a principle, marital disputes involving a converted Muslim spouse and a non-Muslim partner should only be decided in a civil court and not in the Islamic Shariah Court. But at the same time, the court said Subashini's husband has the right to approach the Shariah court to seek redress.

«Civil courts continue to have jurisdiction, notwithstanding his conversion to Islam ... A non-Muslim marriage continues to exist until the (civil court) dissolves it,» said Nik Hashim Nik Abdul Rahman, the presiding judge of the three-member panel. But then he then added that civil courts and Islamic courts have equal status in Malaysia.
Defense lawyers were taken aback by the seemingly contradictory ruling, and said the picture can become clearer only after reading the full written verdict, which will be released later.

«There is a small measure of comfort in that they say civil courts have jurisdiction and that the husband cannot escape his obligations with his conversion,» said Subashini's lawyer, K. Shanmuga.

«But on the other hand they also said that he can go to the Shariah court, and they said the civil court and Shariah courts have equal standing. This has created some confusion. We don't know what impact this will have,» he said.
Subashini's petition was rejected on the ground that she had filed it within three months of her husband's conversion. Her lawyers said she will refile the petition in the High Court to meet the legal requirement that it be filed three months after the conversion.

Subashini married Saravanan Thangathoray, also an ethnic Indian, in a Hindu wedding in 2002. The couple have two sons, Dharvin and Sharvind, now aged 4 and 2. Saravanan told his wife in 2006 that he had converted to Islam. Subashini attempted suicide and was hospitalized. When she returned home, Saravanan had left with Dharvin, whom he claims has also converted to Islam.

Saravanan, by then known as Muhammad Shafi Saravanan Abdullah, filed for divorce and custody rights over the children in a Shariah court in May 2006, and the right to convert Sharvind.

This right was upheld Thursday by the Federal Court, which Shanmuga said is a huge blow to Subashini.

«Most worrying is that they are saying that either parent can convert the child. The net effect of the ruling is that it's a loss for her,» he said.

Muslims, who are 60 percent of Malaysia's population, are governed by Islamic courts while non-Muslims go to civil courts to settle family, marriage and other personal disputes. But the law is vague on which court has the authority to deal with disputes between Muslims and non-Muslims, especially within a family.

Civil courts have generally steered clear of taking a position in such cases, allowing Shariah courts to take the lead. This has raised questions about freedom of religion guaranteed by the Constitution, and strained racial relations in this multiethnic country, which has enjoyed largely peaceful race relations for nearly four decades.

 

Comments (9)Add Comment
...
written by FFT, December 27, 2007 14:53:08
Ho hum. Big surprise.

The Man of the Hour award goes jointly to Mahathir Mohammed and VK Linggam for jointly ensuring that nothing but subservient spineless imbeciles made it into the civil courts.

Say...since Malaysia is already an Islamofascist basket case of a state, maybe there is some wisdom in ensuring PAS comes into power, allow them to adopt their Hudud laws, and we can all sit back and watch the UMNO guys get their limbs chopped off left, right, and center.

We can turn Merdeka Square into our own Chop Chop Square. smilies/grin.gif
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 38
...
written by malaysianohope, December 27, 2007 15:59:43
I sympathise with Suba but I hoped she should divorce the scumbag and get on with her life.

There is no justice in Malaysia, with the PM still in slumberland.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 19
...
written by rayfire, December 27, 2007 16:04:19
Guess the judge was trying to please both parties. The decision seems neither here nor there. Not much of a strong judgement though, wonder if it is due to pressure from public or powers to be.
Hope the lawyers could go through the written judgement to clearly understand what is it that was said. Seems vague to me. So all the people , better hold the comments before clarity of the judgement is determined.

smilies/cry.gif

Is it true, civil court and syariah court is of the same stature? Can a learned lawyer advice on this please smilies/sad.gif
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by Sophia, December 27, 2007 19:17:29
Here goes the country. RM50 says that we'll have another rally in the future, or perhaps even worse some revolt. Padan muka all of us.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by Dogboy, December 27, 2007 21:13:30
There is NO human rights in Malaysia. The state will tell you what you can and cannot do when it comes to religion. Man is Muslim but woman is not....so how?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by temanmu, December 28, 2007 01:02:54
The Syriah Court is an inferior court (but it does seem that it has God on it's side)!

Anyway, glad to hear that the case will be re-submitted to the Federal Court. We do not want a technical knock out (TKO), as in this round.

We want to a real KO to know the true situation!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by InEffective, December 28, 2007 03:15:39
Comprehensively disgusting and repulsive

Judgments reeking of judge's self-preservation, self-esteem, and religion-promotion instead of rights and well-being of a torn family needing fair unbiased fair dispute arbitration and resolution.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by ahmadbadrul40, December 30, 2007 01:12:08
Why am I not surprise?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by ahmadbadrul40, December 30, 2007 01:12:51
This is not going to go down well with all the non-muslims.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 

Sponsored Links

World Futures  Moscow's Middle East conference: Should the Muslims depend only on the US to solve the Palestine crisis?

Future Fastforward  A controversial analysis by a controversial analyst, Matthias Chang, the lawyer-writer who unabashedly calls a spade a spade and offers no apology for doing so.

Internet TV 3000+ Channels  Pick your favorite internet TV channels straight to your PC! Yay!

Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM