A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow The Corridors of Power arrow If we want Policy instead of Speeches

If we want Policy instead of Speeches PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Monday, 12 October 2009 16:38

Image

The following has nothing to do with Pakatan Rakyat. But it could well be a leaf from what is wrong with Pakatan Rakyat, in particular the part that says 'people are beginning to think that a speech IS policy' and 'we want policy instead of speeches'. So Pakatan Rakyat had better take note. Talk is cheap. Speeches may sound good. But at the end of the day it is your policies that count. And the problem with Pakatan Rakyat is it has none.

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Vers La Verité Speech in Paris 

President Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize was not the only news yesterday. And in my opinion, it’s not even the biggest news. It’s not even the saddest news. But it does provide us with some critical information as we move forward. The three-part question for us, tonight however, is “What are we moving forward TO; is that the place we want to go; and if not, what do we do about it?

In other words, “What is our vision for the future and how do we define success?”

I have been and am still in deep pain over the institutional homicide of my aunt and in my grief, I’ve considered giving up.

But then, I wiped the tears from my eyes long enough to remember communities of people that I’ve been blessed enough to get to know, from Toronto, Canada to Cape Town, South Africa; from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to Valdosta, Georgia, there are people struggling through their own pain, their own deep personal disappointments to reach a better place—not just for themselves, but for the global community of man. And I know deep in my own heart, as broken as it is, that I cannot give up. My brain tells me that the struggle for truth, justice, peace, and dignity is too important to lose because of heartbreak.

The one thing that probably best defines everyone in this room are our search for and activities on behalf of principles that are bigger than ourselves. We want our governments to tell us the truth; we want them to deliver justice; we want our global community to live in peace; and we want respect for the dignity of all humankind.

So if these are the ingredients of our vision, what tools do we need to produce the desired result?

Well, first of all, the desired result has to have definition.

I mentioned in one of my messages to a dear friend in response to the Nobel award to President Barack Obama that we needed to keep our eyes on the prize and then I erased it because I don’t think we’ve sufficiently defined what the prize is.

So there must be a small, cohesive, international group of rock-solid people feverishly working to redefine for all who want to be active, and a part of our vision, just what the prize is. And this “prize,” our vision, must be repeated and explained often so people can differentiate our vision, from their reality.

Here is where language becomes important. If we want policy instead of speeches, then this must be repeated early and often because what I’m alarmed by is that in the absence of us providing real definition, and there are reasons for that, people are beginning to think that a speech IS policy.

But, as I said earlier, there was a lot of news yesterday. Some of it even more important than the Nobel Peace Prize Award, but the award certainly overshadowed all other stories.

And I’m always searching for context. Because, as the U.S. military puts it, “perception management” is important. And we must understand the context of what happens and when it happens, in order to understand why.

I always say that we must see the invisible, hear the unspoken, and read the unwritten. That’s what some of the organizers of Vers La Verité were professionally trained to do, before they became whistleblowers, and now our leaders.

Now, what were some of those other interesting news items?

Well, at a Native American Lodge located next to Senator John McCain’s ranch, two people died and several others were hospitalized following a hazardous materials situation at the Sweat Lodge, which is like a spiritual retreat led by Native Americans. I’ve even been invited to participate in one upon my return to the U.S.

Now, I find this interesting and a story that should be followed up on and I will be doing that because I want to make sure there’s no bigger story hidden in an important cultural ritual of the Native Americans who are victims of a genocide in North America that continues to this day.

On the day that the Nobel Prize was announced, we also learned that the U.S. bunker buster bomb will be ready in a few more months.

This is the bomb that holds over 5,000 pounds of explosives and is designed to penetrate hardened facilities, including those underground. Some brilliant people in the U.S. even want to put nuclear tips on bunker buster bombs. However, in announcing the near deployment of the project that pays McDonnell Douglas to adapt the B-2 bomber so it can deliver the Boeing-made bomb to its intended target, the Pentagon press secretary said, "The reality is that the world we live in is one in which there are people who seek to build weapons of mass destruction and they seek to do so in a clandestine fashion." The article noted that the Obama Administration had not ruled out military action against Iran.

Another story noted that hours after winning the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, President Obama met with his military advisors about troop levels in Afghanistan. The troop increase requested by the U.S. Commander ranged, it is reported, from 10,000 to 60,000—although the top number isn’t listed in that news report. One has to go to another news item to see the true top number. At any rate, it seems that the choices confronting U.S. and European leaders is whether to increase the current 68,000 U.S. boots on the ground in Afghanistan or to merely increase the number of drone attacks. Decreasing death and destruction and bringing our young men and women home is not on the Nobel Peace Prize winner’s agenda for discussion.

The last article of note is about a restaurant in west Georgia that is using the “N-word” on its marquee to describe President Obama. It reminds me of the Atlanta area restaurant that put on its marquee that I was Buckwheat with Boobs. Now, those of you who are from the U.S. will know what that means and the depth of insult that was intended. The article notes that I’ve made this restaurant’s marquee, too. Both restaurant owners claim to not be racists and to be protected by free speech.

My point in including this particular news item is that we still have so far to go just in terms of our human relations. It is imperative that we do what we can to spread our message and our vision and reach those who can be reached.

Which brings me to who can be reached.

Those with enough discernment to know that what is being pronounced from on high is not their reality. And rather than accept or discount the contradictions, we want them to join us and struggle for a better reality for everybody.

I am saddened beyond belief that on the day of the Peace Prize award, a struggling democracy in Honduras was besieged with U.S. supplied weapons and U.S.-trained paramilitaries and snipers in support of coup leaders over the democratically-elected people’s leaders. In fact, the latest dispatch from Honduras is that many of the snipers and paramilitaries—now descending on Honduras from all over Latin America—were trained in my home state of Georgia.

More and more people are experiencing cognitive dissonance and rightly so. Our leaders and respected organizations are lying to us! One friend and former Congressional Staffer of mine puts it this way: we need a democratic military instead of a militarized democracy.

The United States, with the help of its European and Asian allies maintains over 700 bases around the world. The number is increasing under President Obama.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. said that we must combat racism, poverty, and militarism. Our movement cannot struggle against militarism and fail to address racism. We must be comprehensive and to racism, militarism, and poverty, we must now add gaining control of a media that will allow us to communicate to a broader community and not just within our small spheres, and regaining control of education so that people are not so dumbed down that they actually believe that war is peace, slavery is freedom, ignorance is strength, and lies are truth.

And if we are right, then others will join us. They will share with us their dreams and their passions and we will help to empower them.

Global resistance combined with local action, organization, vision, commitment, and resources will allow us to have significant victories in the future.

Vers La Verité understands that the foundation of all of this action, attainment of the prize, can only happen with truth as our foundation.

It’s already a brave new world, let’s get busy and make it ours!!!

by Cynthia McKinney, Global Research

Comments (6)Add Comment
...
written by hellosunshine, October 12, 2009 17:49:53
The main problem with ALL our politicians is that they ALL don't walk the talk. NATO (no action, talk only). Period. smilies/wink.gif
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 15
...
written by bodohland_citizen, October 12, 2009 17:50:20
Whilst our mind focused on narrow and tiny issues in our local political arena, something big is taking shape out there and to our untrained mind, these things are treated as non-existense. One world government is so real and its objective is to eliminate half of the world population. The powerful few hidden hands have set their goal to conquer the world and gain the final control. Don't take Iran lightly. Israel's attack on Iran is imminent and the consequence to the whole world spells catastrophy. Watch out for Rockefeller, Rothschild, Du Pont and the other powerful people in the world and their open secret. Find some good links and save the world.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 8
...
written by KingSolomon, October 12, 2009 20:35:53
Talking about Iran, it is suitable for people like Hassan Ali, Zulkefli PKR, Nasharuddin Mat and Hadi. If you have seen how the Iranian authority and the religious bigots torturing their own people, you will want some superpower to punish Iran. Iran is the trouble maker in the Middle East. And I pray that our muslim brothers and sisters here will not follow the Iranians blindly.
report abuse
disagree 7
agree 6
...
written by Chokma, October 13, 2009 07:10:38
Our politicians typically don't have any interest in the Rakyat. They are more interested in power and filling their pockets. Only few with exception. We need to change the mentality of these politicians by removing them whenever they are not upholding Rakyat's interests.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 1
...
written by Aria, October 13, 2009 08:37:44
A quote for the article…
“ they actually believe that war is peace, slavery is freedom, ignorance is strength, and lies are truth. “
Lets look at the Bagan Pinang by-election and the above statement “Ignorance is Strength” . Most of the Bangan Pinang residence are poor and not politically astute as to what is happening in the political arena. So BN just told a few lies and the people believed it is the truth (“Lies are truth”) and voted for BN.
Lets look at it nationally – “War is Peace” BN is stirring up the races to hate each other yet many people believe that BN is the only hope for peace!!. The rakyat should be the masters but in Malaysia the Government is the master (“Slavery is freedom”). The rakyat are the salves and if the rakyat don’t behave… you go to jail, tear gassed, roughed up, murdered.
KingSolomon one of the above writers believes that “Iran is the trouble maker in the Middle East” so he must believe that what US and Israel are doing in the middle is better !!!. This is what many people is Malaysia perceive what Pakatan is doing is bad and what BN is doing is good because of the lies from the media. Pakatan must be more open and transparent if Pakatan want the Rakyat to see them for what they truly are. They must also deliver on their promises to bring in prosperity, transparent governance, no racism in governance and better education. I really don’t know if Pakatan said anything about education, but I believe education is important for the future of Malaysia.
report abuse
disagree 3
agree 5
...
written by Clive, October 18, 2009 15:21:05
For my personal view, I vote PR is because of the PRU12 People Declaration, and nothing that I hate on BN components. Infact, I just tired with BN component. Well, for now I feel not comfortable with PR, It really "Pakatan" rakyat, which Pakat sahaja, mana ada policy......
May be I had my wrong assumption on the People Declaration last PRU...I assume that the Policies is by default of People Declaration, which has been agreed by three parties, and they should fulfill the promise by mean the "Declaration", but PR in Selangor and Kedah (Kulim) has proved it's wrong.
So, I wish PR can loose more seat to get higher level of lessons before Government Malaysia, where teach PR that nothing is cheaper than become Talk-Politician.
PR state from my point;
Penang = 3.5 of 5
Kelantan = 4 of 5
Selangor = 2.5 of 5
Kedah = 2 of 5
Perak = 4 of 5 but lost the whole Perak, what the waste to Rakyat.

Btw, last but not least, PR leader like PKR, DAP, PAS top gun's, if you wont change, I will change my support as well.
Policy please before I hear your talk.


report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM