A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow Guest Columnists arrow Growing list of don’ts

Growing list of don’ts PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Monday, 05 October 2009 08:25

By Zainah Anwar, The Star

Unless we truly want to turn Malaysia into a police state as in Iran and Afghanistan under Taliban rule, laws that turn every perceived sin into a crime against the state will only result in selective persecution and victimisation.

KAREN Armstrong says any belief that makes you compassionate, kind and respectful of others is good religion. If your belief makes you intolerant, unkind and belligerent, this is bad religion, no matter how orthodox it is.

This seems like great common sense to me. It puzzles me why those who insist that Kartika Sari Dewi Shukarno be caned because that is what Islam demands fail to see the many injustices of her case.

She was a first-time offender; she showed remorse and pleaded guilty; and there was no violence in the commission of the offence. Under normal sentencing guidelines, she would have received an automatic one-third remission of the sentence.

But Kartika was sentenced with the maximum fine of RM5,000 and six strokes of the rotan for drinking a glass of beer.

And the Mufti of Perak, Datuk Seri Harussani Zakaria, questions why all the fuss for just six strokes of the rotan when Kartika should have been punished with the full “Islamic” 80 lashes.

And there was Datuk Rosman Ridzuan, the chairman of U Mobile, who was fined only RM700 when he pleaded guilty for assaulting his now ex-wife. Under Section 323 of the Penal Code, this domestic violence offence carries a maximum fine of RM2,000 or one-year imprisonment.

But I am sure those who feel Kartika should be caned are shaking their head and wondering why Datuk Rosman should in the first place be charged and fined for beating his wife, and why indeed should the state intervene in what they deem to be a family matter.

A person who causes harm to another he is supposed to love, cherish and protect is fined a few hundred ringgit, while a young woman trying to make it in life gets the maximum sentence for drinking a glass of beer – which she did not even finish, she said.

And just recently in the same Kuantan Syariah Court, an odd-job Indonesian man who spent RM3.20 for a bottle of samsu which he shared with two other friends in a moment of respite was jailed for a year with six strokes of the rotan. He is in prison because he could not afford to pay the RM5,000 fine.

And yet, we all know that every day, thousands of Muslims commit what are deemed to be offences under the all-encompassing Syariah Criminal Offences (SCO) laws and get away with it. I know of a certain Tan Sri who leaves his collection of expensive bottles of wine in the wine cooler of his favourite restaurant. His bottles are labelled, just like the expensive shampoo and conditioner bottles left by regular clients at their favourite hairdressing salon.

What riles me up every time the Syariah Criminal Offences law is enforced is the injustice of it all. It is often always the disadvantaged and powerless in society who are targeted. While those in powerful places are free to lead the lifestyle they choose, ordinary Muslims feel suffocated and oppressed that what they wear, do, drink, and where they hang out with their friends render them to arbitrary arrest and surveillance by the religious police.

Thousands of young men and women are caught and charged for khalwat, for which they meekly plead guilty in order to avoid further embarrassment. And for what great crimes against the state? The offence of “sitting together on a bench in a shopping complex with the man having his arm on the woman’s back; holding the woman’s waist while walking in a shopping complex; sitting closely and holding hands; sitting on a bench with the woman leaning on the man’s shoulder; sitting in the dark under a tree in a park; sitting on a bench in the dark by a lake”.

Why are Syariah Court resources, which are already stretched out, spent on prosecuting such offences, but women’s right to divorce, to maintenance, to compensation, to a share of the matrimonial assets are denied or delayed?

And how come these enforcement officers have all the resources and time in the world to go after young Muslims doing what young people usually do, and to barge into homes and hotel rooms in pursuit of amorous couples which have led to death and injury to those running away in panic, and to detain even those found in innocent circumstances?

Shouldn’t their resources and time be better spent going after the thousands of errant fathers who fail to pay child support? Why are the religious zealots impervious to the harm these men cause to their children and the family they left behind, and the impact of such gross neglect on society as a whole?

And how come Kajang Prison can execute the caning of Kartika who was sentenced in Pahang under state law, and yet a mother cannot enforce a maintenance order issued by the Kuala Lumpur Syariah Court against a father who has moved to Petaling Jaya?

It is tough being Muslim in this country as the list of the forbidden grows longer. And it’s a double whammy if you are young, and triple whammy if you are a woman. Just for being Muslim, you run the risk of being arrested and hauled into a lorry should the pub or club you are in be raided by the moral police. God forbid if there is alcohol on your breath or your dress is deemed too short, too revealing, too tight.

As with those caught for demonstrating, most of those detained for being Muslim in the wrong place are eventually released because they are in the pub or club to just listen to music or to hang out with their friends over a glass of coke. But the experience in the hands of the religious authorities is enough for a mountain of resistance and defiance to build up.

Since the public furor over Maslinda Ishak, where a Rela officer took a picture of her while she was relieving herself in the lorry used for these raids, the Zouk raid where 100 young Muslims were arrested, the raid on an elderly American couple on holiday in Langkawi and the spate of state attempts to establish citizens’ snoop squads to spy on courting couples and other errant Muslims in Terengganu, Malacca and Selangor, things have largely been quiet for a while on the moral policing front.

The former Prime Minister, Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, had taken a clear stand that his Cabinet disapproved of such moral policing raids and intrusion into private lives. The Minister for Law, Datuk Nazri Aziz, had also warned against the “Talibanisation” of Malaysia following the Zouk raid.

Then came the appointment of the new Minister for Religion, Maj-Gen (R) Datuk Jamil Khir Baharom, in March. And a seminar on caning for syariah crimes was held in April, and the minister said he was most unhappy that the Syariah Courts hardly ever impose the caning sentence. He said the light sentences meted out contributed to the rise in syariah crimes every year. And now a sudden wave of caning sentences by the Syariah Courts and the determination to uphold such sentences no matter the national and international implications and cries of injustice.

In Selangor, where the PAS Commissioner Hassan Ali is the state Exco member in charge of religion, mosque officials were to be empowered to arrest Muslims for drinking alcohol. But his unilateral act incurred not just the ire of his colleagues in the Pakatan-led state government, but also the Sultan of Selangor.

Reading through the list of offences under the Syariah criminal laws of the various states, you wonder how in the world those responsible for these laws think they could be enforced. Well, the Federal Territories Reli­gious Department (JAWI) has set up a 24-hour hotline, and PAS Youth in Terengganu wants to set up a vigilante squad to advise courting couples to desist.

All those legal drafters and Islamic scholars who created the long list of offences and punishment, the Cabinet and state excos who approved them, and Parliament and the legislative assemblies that enacted them … wasn’t anyone thinking through the implications of such violations of privacy and personal rights, and to the kind of society and citizenship this will create?

And still there are those who are demanding that the list of syariah offences be expanded to include all actions deemed against the teachings of Islam and the court’s powers to punish be enhanced beyond the current maximum of three years imprisonment, RM5,000 fine and six strokes of the rotan.

Unless we truly want to turn Malaysia into a police state as in Iran and Afghanistan under Taliban rule – where moral police are at every street corner, every office, every campus – such laws that turn every perceived sin into a crime against the state will only result in selective persecution and victimisation. It is also simply unenforceable because there is no public consensus on what constitutes indecent behaviour that merits regulation and punitive action.

In the end, such moral policing laws will erode the credibility and survival of both the law and the law-making process, says Prof Hashim Kamali who now heads the International Institute for Advanced Islamic Studies, in a study on the SCO legislation.

That this is already the case in Malaysia is obvious. The continual public outrage, the abuses that occur, the need for the federal government or the Sultan to intervene, the release of most of those detained, the apologies that the religious departments have had to extend to those victimised and abused, the damages (Maslinda was recently awarded RM100,000) and compensation (to the Langkawi couple) that the Government has had to pay, the international damage it does to Malaysia’s effort to promote itself as a model moderate and progressive Muslim country.

So the question before the Government is this: Review the Government’s coercive and punitive position on Islam for a more nurturing and compassionate approach; or enhance further the powers of the religious authorities to control the lives of Muslims and punish them ever more harshly, and consequently bring Islam, Islamic law and the religious authorities into further disrepute. Just look at Iran.

Comments (17)Add Comment
...
written by billykbk, October 05, 2009 08:41:12
KAREN Armstrong says any belief that makes you compassionate, kind and respectful of others is good religion. If your belief makes you intolerant, unkind and belligerent, this is bad religion, no matter how orthodox it is.




This is the first time someone from the Star is able to quote something so sensible. Continue with this, you will see many ppl return to subscribe to the paper again. I think today is going to be a wondeful day!
report abuse
disagree 4
agree 55
..., Lowly rated comment [Show]
...
written by sydput, October 05, 2009 09:05:32
The Sultan, Raja is the head of religion in their respective states. I am unsure about those states headed by Governors.
When Najib wanted to implement a rule that children of newly converts cannot be forced into islam, the Royal Majlis intervened and gave their displeasure to such ruling.
In this country, half the muslim population wants more syariah power, including the royalties, although most of them are playboys in their younger days.
And the other half cannot change their faith officially as it has to go through syariah court, a time consuming and humiliating process.
On my IC states that I am muslim, but I cannot be bothered being a muslim. I shall not serve a religion, but I shall serve God and mankind.
Religion makes a person blind to cruelty and stupidity.
report abuse
disagree 5
agree 69
...
written by InEffective, October 05, 2009 09:29:24

Christianity and Hinduism also went through these issues - where those that claimed the mandate of religious authority sought to maintain control and dominating influence over the peoples.

Eventually (after great cost, bloodshed and escaping-migration) the peoples rebelled and decided the right balance of religious influence in their lives.

The key difference between islam and the other religions, is that the rules and practices of religion could never become a platform for prosecutable law.
(all other religions have to abide by the laws of the nation - common law)

So if history has taught us anything at all, we should all expect the religious leadership in malaysia to exert their rules and expand their influence and self-interests over the peoples.

And in the name of religion, a great many old and new atrocities will be committed... (and do expect that your religious authorities will fabricate the perception of legitimacy)

Wonder if the peoples will succumb comprehensively to power-hungry religious 'authorities' ?
report abuse
disagree 3
agree 16
...
written by Godflesh, October 05, 2009 09:38:11
All these vigilante and yariah fellas are sufering from penile envy. They just can't stand the fact that women don't go after them (and their small dicks)and it hurts them when they see beautiful women in Zouk and parks with REAL men. These are the fellas who'll be wanking off to pirated porn at home and wouldn't think twice about shagging their goats! Come get me in ZOuk enjoying my whiskey with the company of beautiful women and I'll kick your sorry arses to Afghanistan where they belong.
report abuse
disagree 7
agree 19
...
written by jaz, October 05, 2009 09:55:00
KAREN Armstrong says any belief that makes you compassionate, kind and respectful of others is good religion. If your belief makes you intolerant, unkind and belligerent, this is bad religion, no matter how orthodox it is.


Yes, this is what I believe too. If it makes you compassionate, kind and respectful, it is a good religion. But religions that creates so much hatred, bombing, cow-head carrying, woman-drinker flogging, backstabbing, rumor-spreading... what's the point of joining anyone of these religion? Not just Muslims, but people I know from church are involved with such hypocrisy! So is some other religion as well.

I'm sorry, if this is what religion is all about, it's not for me. I don't want any part of it. To be frank. I understand this is a sensitive issue, if I have offended anyone, here is my sincere apologies.
report abuse
disagree 4
agree 29
...
written by malgal, October 05, 2009 10:09:19
could it be that titled, important people with strong connections have lighter sentences or none, while the harsher or maximum punishment reserved for those without?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 9
...
written by Jan, October 05, 2009 10:36:32
Those cow head protestors threatened violence and bloodshed if the hindus go ahead build their temple in an area 300 metres from their houses. Do they project their religion as peaceful, tolerant and understanding religion or are they giving an untrue perception of their faith?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 16
...
written by truthbespoken, October 05, 2009 10:48:45
In Malaysia, the extremists and evil politicians are just using religion to play politics and to ensure the continuity of 'Ketuanan Melayu'. They don't care even if it is done against the overall long-term interest of Malaysia's as a nation and in an insensible way onto other human beings! These buggers blatantly project a public image of 'our way or no way'! It's sheer craziness!
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 11
...
written by Apek, October 05, 2009 11:55:51
Thank you Zainah,

In order that we are one people, there cannot be two laws. If there are two laws, then I suggest that a Federal Court established by the Federal Constitution sit in Apex to the State religious Courts and the Civil system. I even venture to say that at present, the State religious courts are out of line and have by and large infringed on the Federal Constitution.

report abuse
disagree 3
agree 7
...
written by panca, October 05, 2009 12:03:46
If you really really really need to be extreme - be extremely kind, extremely compassionate and that be would selfless without harm extremely!

Great Humanity!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 7
...
written by SoundMan, October 05, 2009 13:17:05
Zainah Anwar got it right. God help us from the lunatic fringe of religion. The syariah and hadiths are nothing but man made laws. We live in fear of man-made-laws that can oftentimes, if we are not of the rich and powerful,put our lives are in direct jeopardy of the powers that be.
In BN country lawlessness has grown to where power takes precedence over rights!
report abuse
disagree 3
agree 10
...
written by chin, October 05, 2009 13:31:44
All these religious intolerance is the work of UMNO for UMNO creates and appoints the people in these organizations.

How can UMNO talk about moderation when they promote extremism by their action.

And PKR should be progressive and moderate, it should get rid of the Noordin guy.

This 1Malaysia crap is really dumb, does slogans compensate for extremism behavior?
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 5
...
written by born2reign, October 05, 2009 13:34:03
The Syariah judges are abusers of Islamic laws. In fact many Islam authorities are more egotistical and arrogant than Muslim-like. They target helpless victims.

Why did Syariah not charge the cow-head demonstrators as evil?
Why did Syariah not charge Khairy and many VIPs (like Najis' son) for drinking beer and alcohol?
Why must Syariah take instructions from UMNO, a political party who worships money god?
And if Syariah encourage wife-beaters, then why must Syariah question the many wives who want to convert out of Islam? Wives are not protected by their husbands, fathers, community, and not by Allah.

But those who criticise Islamic laws and criticise the one-sided enforcement of Islam, are branded as insulting Islam, and to be tried for deviance.

This is a circus.
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 10
..., Lowly rated comment [Show]
...
written by hellosunshine, October 05, 2009 15:47:20
Aiya Zainah Anwar, this is almost the same modus operandi of the Cultural Revolutionists that China went saw years back except that this is based on religion. These hollow munafik Muslims are caught up in the religious fervor and talibanism that's sweeping this country. They are doing it for the thrill of power, sexual favors and money from bribery. smilies/wink.gif smilies/grin.gif
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 6
...
written by SuperiorRaceofMorons, October 05, 2009 18:01:17
It is a classic case of selective persecution. Why don't the religious authorities walk into any nightclub in KL, such as Heritage Row, Bangsar, Plaza TTDI etc and I guarantee more than 50 percent of the patrons are muslims and having a good time. Go to any Karaoke joint and you will find plenty of 'The Chosen Race' being entertained by wealthy Chinese businessmen, in the hope of securing lucrative contracts.

The probable reason is they might arrest a VIPs son or daughter or a royal sibling and have to deal with the wrath from the all powerful families. A bunch of hypocrites is what they are since the same people (Politicians) who attempt to whip up the public with their moral policing agenda ... its their children who go out every other night and paint the town red ... to help burn Dad's money.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 8

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM