A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow Letters/Surat arrow Scrap Penang Outer Ring Road project

Scrap Penang Outer Ring Road project PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Friday, 25 September 2009 01:13

The Consumers’ Association of Penang (CAP) and Sahabat Alam Malaysia (SAM) are disappointed that the government is proceeding with the construction of the Penang Outer Ring Road (PORR) project.

It has been reported in the media that the project would be undertaken by a private company Daya Aliran Inovasi Sdn Bhd, whose appointment has been approved by the Economic Planning Unit (EPU).

The RM1.03 billion PORR project entails the construction of an 18km toll highway cutting across the island from Tanjong Tokong to the Penang Bridge in Gelugor. It is reported that the federal government funding for the project is RM150 million while the concessionaire is to come up with the rest.

In return, the concessionaire is seeking rights to reclaim 150 acres in Gurney Drive and another 350 acres in Middle Bank, near Jelutong.

When asked if the state government was in favour of the project, Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng reportedly said that the state government welcomed any project which would help reduce traffic congestion and generate economic growth and revenue for the state.

He also said that the Penang government is still waiting for feedback from the federal government on the project.  On whether the state government would consult the public on the PORR, Lim had said public consultation had already been held, and there were differing views.

We are concerned of these new developments. Since the PORR was first announced in 2002, civil society groups and affected communities who had formed the No-PORR committee had been calling on the government to scrap the project because the environmental repercussions of this project are potentially disastrous, involving hill-cutting and coastal reclamation.

Many citizens and groups have expressed concern not for the sake of opposing the PORR, but out of a genuine concern that the social, environmental and economic costs of this project are way too high for an option that does not have long-term benefits.

Besides this, the PORR project had been lacking in transparency right from the start. No public consultation was done before the government decided to implement the project.

Now we are exasperated that the Penang chief minister feels that there is no need to consult the public.

Earlier when the public’s concerns were raised during several consultations with the previous government, it had not been seriously considered. Now, with the new government, civil society is not even being given an opportunity to raise their concerns.

We have been contending that the PORR is a futile attempt in reducing congestion on existing roads, as stressed by the Penang Urban Transport Study which was commissioned by the state and published in 1998. Based on the findings of the study pertaining to the effectiveness, usefulness and efficiency of the PORR, the report stated that the PORR will not be of much use to alleviate traffic congestion in the long run.

We have been demanding for an integrated public transport system for more sustainable and cost effective solution in the long term. We suggest that the government put its energy and resources into upgrading public transportation in the state.
 
With better public transport, there would be no necessity for the PORR as there would be less private vehicles on the road.

Thus, we urge the federal and Penang state governments to scrap the construction of the PORR and instead focus on implementing an efficient and integrated public transport system in the state.

S M Mohamed Idris
President, Consumers’ Association of Penang & Sahabat Alam Malaysia

Comments (5)Add Comment
..., Lowly rated comment [Show]
...
written by educationist, September 25, 2009 05:30:23
What is the price of progress?
That public transport needs to be improved in Penang is a given.
But is PORR the answer?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 14
...
written by mikewang, September 25, 2009 07:11:08
One of the reasons why many Penangites objected to BN was the way PORR was pushed down their throats.

No, this island doesn't need a toll road that will cut through many greenery and housing estates.
She needs a reliable and effective public transport system.
Why build more roads when the government cannot even get taxis to use meters?
What about using the allotted money to build an LRT/Monorail service for the island instead?
We do not want a transportation principle for the island where more cars are put on the road before we have an effective public transport system.
If we have less cars, we will not need more roads.
report abuse
disagree 4
agree 27
...
written by Heaven8402, September 27, 2009 04:37:46
Stop the F**king housing developement in Penang. The island is so damned cramped right now!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by freerpk, September 28, 2009 08:32:22
I think the money should be used for a mass transport system like the MRT in Singapore. If people can travel everywhere easily, in comfort and on time there is no need for them to drive their cars. Building more roads is not the answer to a small island like Penang where a MRT can be easily built with minimal costs since the area covered is not that large.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM