A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow Letters/Surat arrow The government is misleading us about the hike in petrol prices and RON rating

The government is misleading us about the hike in petrol prices and RON rating PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Saturday, 05 September 2009 09:21

By Dr. Adrian Wong

I'm quite fed up with The Star. They already have a sordid reputation of spinning cover for the government, and they still continue to do so even after getting lambasted online time and time again. They are really HOPELESS.

Recently, they posted a piece on the increase (yet another) in petrol price as the government discontinued RON92 petrol and replaced it with RON95. The government made use of the switch to increase the price of RON95 by 5 cents and jacked the price of RON97 all the way to RM 2.05 per liter, which is 25 cents (13.9%) higher.

This was what the Star wrote :

Quote:

How will you benefit from the new RON95 petrol?
by LEONG HUNG YEE

PETALING JAYA: RON95 was the buzz at neighbourhood petrol stations as consumers had to quickly grasp the differences between the RON92 (which is discontinued) and RON97 (which has been upgraded) and the new, more environment friendly oil.

The first thing they want to know is how they will benefit from this change to RON95 which retails at RM1.80 per litre.

“About 90% of motorists using RON97 (which has been upgraded to a premium product and sold at a higher price of RM2.05 per lire) can now switch to RON95,” said Domestic Trade, Cooperative and Consumer Affairs Ministry secretary-general Datuk Zain Mohd Dom.

http://biz.thestar.com.my/archives/2009/9/3/business/p1-petrolprice.JPG

“The price of RM1.80 for RON95 will be capped at this level for the rest of the year,’’ Zain told StarBiz, referring to a statement earlier by Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob. “It moves within an active price range, depending on the price trend of oil gauged over a one-month period.’’

All this while, consumers have been using RON97 which is too powerful for cars today. “Take a look at car manuals and one will often find that RON95 is recommended,’’ said Zain, adding that RON97 had stronger ingredients that were more suitable for higher powered cars.

RON (research octane number) measures the octane quality of fuel. It refers to the fuel’s ability to resist premature and uncontrolled combustion that occurs when fuel pre-ignites before ignition by the spark plug.

The newly-introduced RON95 fuel is priced at RM1.80, five sen higher than that of RON92, which is leaded petrol. Concurrently, RON97 has been upgraded as a premium product and its price has gone up to RM2.05 from RM1.80.

Ismail had said at a press conference on Tuesday although the price of RON95 was higher, the Government was still subsidising 33.81 sen per litre, which comes up to about RM304mil monthly.

He said the upward revision of the prices was necessary as the global crude oil price had doubled since the announcement by former minister Datuk Shahrir Abdul Samad in March that RON95 would be sold at RM1.75.

Currently, the Government is subsidising 42.72 sen per litre for RON97.

While consumers who were using RON92 are required to pay more when they upgrade to RON95, those using RON97 and are able to downgrade to RON95 will save 25 sen per litre.

According to car manufacturers, as long as the fuel used is not below the minimum RON requirement (RON91), it would be appropriate for any vehicle.

Given that 90% of all cars can use the newly-launched RON95, this should provide savings for most consumers. All Perodua and Proton cars are compatible with RON95.

“What you need to do is find out whether your car can run on RON95 or not. This information should be available in your car manual or on a sticker near your fuel flap,” an industry player

A BMW Malaysia spokesman said there were no problems with RON95, in general, for BMW models although there was no technical data on performance.

Performance cars such as Suzuki Swift Sport, Honda Civic Type R, Mitsubishi Airtrek Turbo, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution, Range Rover and Skoda 200FSI are incompatible with RON95.

Owners of cars that are incompatible with RON95 will have to fork out an extra RM10 for every 40 litres of RON97.

Shell Malaysia Trading Sdn Bhd managing director Datuk Mohzani Wahab said the company remained confident that its revenue would increase this year, despite the anticipated lower sales of Shell Super 97 (RON97) due to the 25 sen price difference from the price of RON95.

Mohzani said the RON95 had received encouraging response from motorists so far.

Meanwhile, it was reported that Petronas Dagangan Bhd expected its RON95 fuel to register 95% sales. The company started selling RON95 in May and 65% of its consumers had opted for RON95 against RON92. said.

This isn't the first time the government has attempted to delude the public about RON rating. Neither is this the first time The Star has done their bit to spin the story for the government and pass fallacy for fact. Greatly displeased, I wrote to the editors of The Star :

Quote:

I’m writing in reference to the piece “How will you benefit from the new RON95 petrol?” by Leong Hung Yee.

I’m no motorhead but this is a misleading piece of spin. Here are the reasons why :

1. RON97 petrol, before and now, is the same product. It was not “upgraded” as the writer mentioned.
2. The government had earlier promised that the price for petrol will remain until the end of the year. The statement that RON95 will be capped at RM 1.80 is nothing more than an attempt to cover up the price hike. Then again, he’s a politician.
3. RON number does not measure the octane “quality” of the fuel. The octane rating is a measure of the RESISTANCE of petrol to premature detonation. It has nothing to do with fuel quality. The word “quality” should have never been mentioned, unless it was inserted intentionally to mislead the reader.
4. RON97 has “stronger” ingredients? A higher octane rating merely means the fuel is more resistant to premature detonation. It doesn’t mean the fuel is stronger or has stronger ingredients.
5. RON92 is NOT leaded petrol! Leaded petrol has been discontinued in Malaysia for years. RON92 is simply unleaded petrol with a Research Octane Number of 92!

Seriously, has the journalistic and editorial quality at The Star dropped so low that neither the journalist or the editor bothered to do a little fact-checking before publishing the piece?

If you do print a correction, please do inform the public that using petrol with a higher RON rating that your car’s engine supports is a waste of money. Petrol with a higher RON rating will NOT deliver better performance. If your car supports RON 91, then RON 91 is good enough.

I e-mailed that to them at 2:23 PM on Thursday, September 3rd. No response until today. No surprise.

Read at: http://forums.techarp.com/adrian-wong/25510-government-misleading-us-about-hike-petrol-prices-ron-rating.html

Comments (18)Add Comment
...
written by alpha100, September 05, 2009 09:37:18
Yes! The Goverment tipuing us rakyat! Tipu No 1 - Statement on TV that crude oil was USD$83-00 when it was on around USD$70-00 as reasons for increase. Perhaps that consumer minister did'nt even know what he talking about. Tipu No. 2. Petrol of RON97 increase by 25cents. where is the logic for this increase? Was RON95 meant to be RM1-55 only. I hope they lose in next by-election to have a BIG slap on their face for this and also for the pkfz and cow head incident.
report abuse
disagree 3
agree 82
...
written by smeagrooo, September 05, 2009 09:42:33
The most important thing is not whether ur car can support RON92/95/97. The most important thing is whether the rakyat can help support ROasting Mama & Najis (RON) and help build up their war chest in anticipation of ousting the Selangor Govt.

Money is needed to buy frogs. Frogs only use PREMIUM products but of cos money is the best of them all.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 37
...
written by PRman, September 05, 2009 09:44:41
These reporters have lost their integrity and professionalism of being a reporter/journalist. They will rather to let Malaysia to go back ward, to fill sell their dignity to the company by misleading Malaysians. Shame on them!
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 26
...
written by Concerned_Citizen, September 05, 2009 09:49:32
I know nothing about the RON but as far as I concern you cannot compare apple to orange. Now that said they remain the price at RM1.80 but giving you lower RON (95 instead of 97). Isn't that a price hike? (As far as consumer concern lower number represent lower quality and thus must be cheaper)

By the way, we have all been using RON 95 for such a long time and now wihout the citizens concern, they cancelled it and replaced it a so call upgraded premuim product which the rakyat do not need. Is this what they call RAKYAT DIDAHULUKAN, PENCAPAIAN DIUTAMAKAN?

Now RAYA is coming and they hike the petrol price, would this help?
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 35
...
written by Concerned_Citizen, September 05, 2009 09:51:27
Sorry error, ...been using RON 97 (not 95) for such a long time and now .... (just getting too angry)
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 15
...
written by mikefonz, September 05, 2009 10:02:10
The stupid Goverment is making the Rakyats to downgrade their
lifestyles. Maybe we'll be like Zimbabwe soon.
Have always been using RON97 and now asking me to use RON95.
Like asking me to eat porridge instead of rice. STUPID GOMEN.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 25
...
written by jjireh99, September 05, 2009 10:50:20
yah, everyone is saying RON stands for ROsmah Najib! I laughed so loud! I have been using V-power all these years. Before V-power came into being, it was Unleaded petrol (GREEN COLOUR). Now, as I know, UNLEADED petrol has been renamed RON97 and did away with V-power. RON 95 replaced RON 97. SO CONFUSING!!!!! smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 11
...
written by jaz, September 05, 2009 10:54:05
A load of bullshit if you ask me.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 9
...
written by jshing2158, September 05, 2009 11:01:28
Govt Treasury no money sudah KOSONG. Najis and gang is desperate, nothing to leave for their future generations. and coming GE13 they will be kicked out by the rakyat, no more easy monies. I would not be surprise if RON 92 is just being rebranded RON 95. Any independent test conducted?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 19
...
written by toolan, September 05, 2009 11:24:33
two days ago, i was on the way home in my RON95 filled car when a friend rang up mentioning the new "upgraded" fuel gives less km/litre and shortly after the call , my car ran out of fuel 4km from home.

Normally, using the same amount of ron97 fuel will get me home with much to spare. Seems like the government has really hoodwinked us again with their usual bullshit.

If indeed this fuel is less efficient, we will soon see the impact of commodity prices increase soon.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 13
...
written by peter, September 05, 2009 11:52:31
I'm quite fed up with The Star.

What you're still reading the garbage?!! Do yourself a favour... ditch that garbage and all the others... Berita Hairan, Utuasan Meloya, New Shit Times etc. We have to send a clear message: the buyers have the power. Power to shut newspaper companies down.

We have to be serious about this. Together we can force these umNo-nazi-party papers out of business.

It's simple, spend your RM1.50 on a good cuppa of coffee, the cuppa will do our brains good smilies/grin.gif

Advertisers will have find other ways to reach their audience.. e.g by advertising in Mkini, m2day etc.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 22
...
written by Wisdom above, September 05, 2009 12:29:31
I am using water extracted Hydrogen H2O -WATER to run my Car ! Many people the World over are using them ! By right price should DROP as world demand for Crude Oil has drop tremendously ? Imagine at US$15 per barrel for Crude Oil, will PETRONAS go Bankrupt ?
report abuse
disagree 3
agree 10
...
written by manic_annie, September 05, 2009 13:50:33
What a load of CRAP!!! I hope the UMNO bloodsuckers would just roll over n die. Until they do, I will not be content.
We have been trampled on too many times already.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 7
...
written by righttruthspeaks, September 05, 2009 15:01:39
My friend, saifool, does not under stand why all of a sudden he has to pay 10 sen more for Ron 95 when he was doing all right with Ron 92 for his cub-cai.
Are motocyclists subsidising the car owners and petrol companies or what??/?

Ten sen more per litre is 45.05 sen per gallon.
There, vote bn, and this is what you get. How else are najis, moohyiddin etc going to make more millions???
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 12
...
written by one box, September 05, 2009 16:06:42
Dr Wong,

I am not sure if I have missed anything in your article but I don’t see a big issue with The Star report that you have loathed so much.

If fact, I support this as a good move by the Government to curb the subsidy.
If we don’t need RON 97 why are we paying for that?

I also feel that you are reading too “technical” into the article. Let me reply to your 5 points:

1.(Wong) RON97 petrol, before and now, is the same product. It was not “upgraded” as the writer mentioned.
One Box> I think you have misunderstood the “upgrade” means here. It means RON97 is now being sold at at higher price. Nothing wrong with the use of “upgrade” here. It is a matter of choice of English.

2.(Wong) The statement that RON95 will be capped at RM 1.80 is nothing more than an attempt to cover up the price hike
OB> I don’t think there is any attempt to hide the price hike. We all know there is a price hike

3.(Wong) RON number does not measure the octane “quality” of the fuel. The octane rating is a measure of the RESISTANCE of petrol to premature detonation. It has nothing to do with fuel quality
OB> depends on the definition of “quality” here. It will provide a higher power if your car can take advantage of the higher compression ratio. I would assume higher power can be translated to “quality”, don’t you agree? If it is lower quality, would it be sold at higher price?

4.(Wong) RON97 has “stronger” ingredients? A higher octane rating merely means the fuel is more resistant to premature detonation. It doesn’t mean the fuel is stronger or has stronger ingredients
OB> Again, as I mentioned earlier, it can withstand “higher compression ratio”. That can be translated as “stronger” or "quality" don’t you agree? From a layman’s point of view.

5.(Wong) RON92 is NOT leaded petrol! Leaded petrol has been discontinued in Malaysia for years. RON92 is simply unleaded petrol with a Research Octane Number of 92
OB> This point you are correct


Out of the above 5 points, you have made mistakes in 4 points. The Journalist has made 1 mistake.

So you lose, Leong Hung Yee wins.

smilies/wink.gif
report abuse
disagree 23
agree 22
..., Lowly rated comment [Show]
...
written by one box, September 06, 2009 01:15:47
Guys,
even Dr Wong himself has asked everyone to read before you posted. Here's the general knowledge that most of you don't do research.

1. there is no difference in principle for RON95 and RON97 other than the octance content.
2. RON 97 will provide better power ONLY if your car can take higher compression ratio, which can deliver higher power through the pistons.
3. For the same model, the older car you have, you higher Octane you need so that your car will not have "knocking effect". So SiHangChai is absolutely wrong by saying the "DONT try to switch to RON95 if you car is less than 5 years old".

report abuse
disagree 2
agree 17
..., Lowly rated comment [Show]

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM