A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow No Holds Barred arrow KMM: The Young Malay Union (1938) : part 1

KMM: The Young Malay Union (1938) : part 1 PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Monday, 13 July 2009 00:00

Image

Mustapha Hussain: Malay Nationalism Before UMNO

THE MEMOIRS OF MUSTAPHA HUSSAIN, 1910-1957

Even sadder, Malays could not count on the educated Malays to fight their case as most members of the new Malay elite had become Westernised. Thus, lower rung Malays were helpless to defend their lost rights and could do little to halt the economic onslaught by others.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

KMM, or the Young Malay Union, was founded by a group of radical left nationalists in their late twenties. Influenced by world events and by political events in Turkey in particular, they desired a political body similar to the Young Turks. The word ‘young’ did not preclude acceptance of members of any age group so long as they were “young in spirit.”

KMM wished to enter the arena of local politics as the saviour of nusa dan bangsa (country and people) before the axe of destruction could annihilate them. Homeland Tanah Melayu (The Malay Land), with Malays as its rightful owners, has already been renamed Malaya by the British, with ‘Malayan’ nationals about to inherit what Allah had bestowed on the Malays.

These young nationalists despised every form of colonial oppression. The British, initially accepted as protectors and peacekeepers, had become unbridled oppressors, like other European colonisers. Through their Residential System, policies were subtly introduced from London without giving the Malay Rulers much voice.

One bone of contention was the British policy of allowing tens of thousands of ‘others’ into Malaya. To administer Malaya, the British colonialists brought in educated foreigners from Ceylon, India and Hong Kong to help them exploit Malaya’s economic wealth. They also introduced uneducated workers from China and India. To maintain security, they imported troops from India and Burma. Why did the British not employ more Malays in both government and private sectors? Given a chance, they too would have proven progressive and capable! British excuses that Malays were unqualified and lazy did not hold water.

On top of that, British educational policies were not formulated to guide Malays towards better employment. In the 1930s, Malays only numbered 16 per cent of students in English schools in the Federated Malay States. Malays were, in effect, merely ‘educated’ to become traditional farmers and fishermen whose lives would just be a fraction better than their parents’.

Let me quote a British officer’s statement in the 1920s: “The aim of the Government is not to turn out a few well educated youths, nor a number of less educated boys: rather, it is to improve the bulk of the people, and to make the son of a fisherman or peasant a more intelligent fisherman or peasant than his father had been and a man whose education will enable him to understand how his lot in life fits in with the scheme of life around him.”

The Malays lagged behind in all fields, yet socio-economic policies introduced by the British were not designed to touch Malay lives, especially ‘lower rung’ Malays. They were left to carry on with their traditional lifestyles. No efforts were undertaken to improve the Malay peasants’ miserable standard of living.

We, the “progressive youths”, were fully aware that the British could not be depended upon to upgrade our socio-economic status. In fact, the British were quickly learning to evade the issue of Malay pre-eminence (Ketuanan Melayu).

We felt that if Malays united under the KMM, we could act to assert our rights. KMM could not only ensure peace, prosperity and security in the country, but at the same time, uphold Malay pre eminence and birthrights. In short, KMM would be the saviour of the Malays in their homeland.

The Malays had begun to be suspicious of Chinese immigrants from February 1931 when Penang Consultative Council Member Lim Cheng Ean boldly challenged, “Who says Malaya belongs to the Malays?” The Malay press answered this challenge vociferously, while individuals responded by forming Malay associations in Perak, Selangor and Pahang.

The Malays were, however, less alarmed by the presence of the Indians and the Ceylonese. These two nationalities were only seen as ‘birds of passage’, unlike Chinese immigrants who had become interested in staying on permanently.

Nevertheless, these two races were still looked upon negatively as ‘robbers’ of employment, in both Government Departments and estates. It was Malay labourers who cleared thick jungles to plant rubber seedlings in British estates, but when it was time to tap them, Indian labourers were brought in, replacing Malays.

In the Malayan Railways, positions – right from the highest position of Station Master to the lowest position of Porter -- were monopolised by Indians. Datuk Undang Rembau tried to remedy this social malady, but his efforts died with him.

Even sadder, Malays could not count on the educated Malays to fight their case as most members of the new Malay elite had become Westernised. Thus, lower rung Malays were helpless to defend their lost rights and could do little to halt the economic onslaught by others.

Leftist Malays with KMM hoped to unite the entire Malay population in ‘passive resistance’ similar to Gandhi’s, or, should KMM receive support from student bodies, move in ‘active resistance’ like Burma’s Thakin.

With such noble intentions and aspirations, KMM was founded in April 1938 at a meeting held at the home of Hassan Haji Manan along Jalan Pasar in Kuala Lumpur, the capital of the Federated Malay States. The KMM’s formation was one of the earliest organised efforts by Malays to disseminate political ideas.

The founding members of the KMM included Ibrahim Yaakub (a Malay school teacher turned journalist) from Kerdau, Pahang; Mustapha Hussain (a lecturer at the School of Agriculture of Malaya in Serdang, Selangor) from Matang, Perak; Hassan Haji Manan (a Malay school teacher) from Selangor; Abdul Karim Rashid (a Malay school teacher) from Selangor; Onan Haji Siraj (a Technical School certificate holder) from Ipoh, Perak; Othman Mohd. Noor or M.N. Othman (a Sentul, Kuala Lumpur, Central Workshop clerk) from Tapah Road, Perak; Sulung bin Chik (a Technical School certificate holder and Subordinate Officer in the Railways Department) from Pahang; Bahar bin Abik (a Subordinate Officer at the Government Printers, Kuala Lumpur) from Kuala Lumpur; Idris bin Hakim (a clerk in the Customs Office, Brickfields, Kuala Lumpur) from Kampar, Perak; Abdullah Kamil (a journalist) from Kuala Lumpur; Abdul Samad Ahmad (a journalist) from Selangor; Mohamad Salehuddin (a journalist) from Kuala Lumpur and Ishak Haji Muhammad (Pak Sako; a magistrate turned journalist) from Pahang. Most of these active members were Malay educated, but a few had attended English schools.

Ibrahim Yaakub was elected President, proposed by Hassan Haji Manan and seconded by Abdul Karim Rashid. I was made Vice President, proposed by Sulung bin Chik and seconded by Bahar bin Abik. The Working Committee members were:

Secretary I: Hassan Haji Manan
Secretary II: Othman Mohd. Noor (M.N. Othman)
Treasurer: Idris Hakim
The other Central Committee members included:
Abdul Karim Rashid
Bahar bin Abik
Sulung bin Chik Onan Haji Siraj
Ishak Haji Muhammad (Pak Sako)
Abdul Samad Ahmad
Abdullah Kamil
I would like to add that the two big names in Malay left politics after World War II, Ahmad Boestamam and Dr Burhanuddin Al Helmi, were not KMM founder members. Ahmad Boestamam only joined KMM just a few months before World War II broke out.

KMM policies were not in line with the Perak, Selangor and Pahang Malay Associations, which were pro colonial and provincial in outlook. KMM was absolutely anti colonial and fiercely determined to free the ‘Malay Land’ from the British grip. The British Government would be pressured to listen to the Malays and a democratic system of government had to supplant the colonists.

As Malaya’s first political organisation, its leaders were proud to be the first to use the magic word, Merdeka. Appropriately, KMM had a secret meaning, Kesatuan Malaya Merdeka, or Independent Malaya Union, known only to the KMM’s inner circle, consisting of just a few members.

Later, in January 1942, this secret meaning shocked Japanese officers when I (as KMM Vice President) and other KMM members (Onan Haji Siraj, M. N. Othman, Hamzah Alang, Abdul Rahman Tambi, Mohd. Isa Sulaiman, Datuk Wan Daud Ahmad, Saidi Hashim, Kiman, Mohd. Mustafa Ali, Abdul Kadir Adabi, Hashim bin Mat Dali, Naning, Zainal Abidin bin Kassim, Haniff bin Sulaiman) demanded the Japanese commanders proclaim Malaya’s Independence after revealing that KMM’s secret aspiration was Independence. The story of this demand will follow in a later chapter.

Translated by Insun Mustapha
Edited by Jomo K. S.


Publisher: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn Bhd
No. 1 & 3, Jalan 3/91A, Taman Shamelin Perkasa, Cheras, 56100 Kuala Lumpur
Tel: 03-9285 6577

Foreign Distributor: Singapore University Press Pte Ltd

Mybooks.com.my
Price: RM50.00

Comments (10)Add Comment
...
written by *********, July 13, 2009 08:01:05
The two faced BN/Umno regime seems to be supporting such aggression on minorities in this country by Muslim zealots aligned to Umno. One thing is for sure, what these so-called Muslims are doing are actually against the teachings of Islam. Islam does not condone such Evil acts. This is the Islam of Umno. These people are giving Islam a bad name. All these seems to be going on with the tacit approval of the lap dog non Muslim BN component parties such as MCA, MIC, Gerakan, PBS, UPKO, PBRS, SUPP, LDP, PPP etc...More http://*********.********.com/...html#links
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 11
...
written by temenggong, July 13, 2009 08:18:37
It was Malay labourers who cleared thick jungles to plant rubber seedlings in British estates, but when it was time to tap them, Indian labourers were brought in, replacing Malays.


This may not be quite accurate. When the British arrived in Malacca in 1816 Malaya was largely impenetrable, a large Taman Negara, with pockets of villages along the coast and rivers. At best the British could penetrate till Naning in Malacca/Negri border.

After the Naning Wars in 1929-1832 the British could not rely on malay labor, which was insufficient anyway, as the entire population of Malacca was only about 12,000 in 1820. The numbers of 'captive' labour required meant they 'had to' bring in Indians. Thus started the Indian immigration to clear forests, lay roads and railsways and man the JKR. Indian immigration took off in big numbers after 1881 when estates were first introduced.

There are records saying malay labour was unreliable as most took off after a few weeks or months of work. The British needed 'captive' labour in large enough numbers who had nowhere to run.

1.2 million Indians were brought in by this time to man the estates. Now what if malays were engaged instead? Meaning more than half of malay society would have been tappers? It would have fractured malay society and today it would have been a different story.

The chinese were also coming in during this period to Malacca, Lower Perak and Penang. However with the Indians opening up the country, this paved the way for very large numbers of chinese coming especially during the 1860s onwards all along the west coast.

THe malays were secluded and all by themselves and just collecting rent from the chinese miners. There was little interaction and animosity.

The Chinese and Indians were beginning to be seen as a threat only in the 1930s, by the malays, and also by the British as they were concerned about the fallout from the Indian independence movement. By 1938 the immigration ceased, and citizenship was frozen. Till then there was no noise. Everyone was happy. Here begins the 'modern' history of Malaya.
report abuse
disagree 7
agree 40
...
written by bikerzon, July 13, 2009 10:04:09
Does this mean that the majority of early Malay elites actually condone colonialists rules? Then can I say that the early UMNO leaders are pro-British?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 15
...
written by KotaDamansara73, July 13, 2009 11:30:18
British education is the one that gave the Malays, the tools and knowledge to gain independence. Otherwise, the hardcore uneducated Malays will run amok and destroy every civilisation in their path to gain a bloody independence.

If the uneducated hardliner Malays were to gain an upperhand during the time, most likely, the independence of Malaya will be gain through bloodshed. The scenario could have turn to the worst, in which case, the most likely scenario will be a civil war between the non-malays and the malays which will bring the country to a never ending chaos and riots.

report abuse
disagree 6
agree 5
...
written by Fairminded, July 13, 2009 11:31:37
I do not agree that the colonial education is tailored to keep the Malays in lower level jobs, it is tailored to keep ALL races semi educated. Only a few elites are trained for higher jobs to assist in their ruling of the country. It is this elite Malayans (all races) that helped the British and refused to help the Malays and all other races. It is not other races that is keeping the Malays down. They are in the same situation. My father was an indented labourer in the tin mines in 1930s and he told me that many Chinese indented labourers died of hardwork and diseases too while clearing the jungles for the tin mines and then working in them. It is not like the Chinese came over after the Malays had done the dirty work of clearing the land.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 20
...
written by KotaDamansara73, July 13, 2009 11:44:20
So it should be Mahathir's main priority to educate all Malays and instill the thirst for knowledge and skills. Instead, he spent all the Malaysian's wealth into glorifying himself, Daim and Daim's friend.

No doubt, that the Petronas tower brings in tourist. But does the Malays want to be just remembered as tourist friendly people? How about being at the forefront of science and technology?

I guess, it never come across their mind. The most important thing is that, I am seen driving a Mercedez Benz and own a Palatial palace. That is the most important thing in the Malays leader mindset.

So I can I conclude, that the Malay leaders are the most primitive race in Asia?
report abuse
disagree 5
agree 10
...
written by tenang, July 13, 2009 12:10:29
Kotadamansara73,

It it pretty clear you are spinner from BN/UMNO. You start with seemingly sound reasoning, and then at the end, out of the blue, you shoot that the "Malay leaders are most primitive race in Asia". It is pretty obvious you made a calculated statement with the purpose of instigating the hatred between main races. I would like to postulate that your master pays for you just to do this dirty work.

After you and your gang cause enough tension between races, then UMNO/BN can come in to be the hero to "rescue" everyone.

But do you think Malaysians will still fall for your tricks with this age of internet? Get a life!


report abuse
disagree 1
agree 15
...
written by born2reign, July 13, 2009 12:32:06
So long winded, sounds like my father who keeps on about the old days. Let's just focused on the last 10 years. Badawi and Najib's rule. The past is the past, the British were like this and like that, so what, they have gone home. They have pretty much left Malaysia with our natural resources intack, and introduced us to education from the missionaries.

Today, after driving out all foreigners with the stupid 30% babi buta ownership, we are trying to woo back these Americans, Europeans, Japanese and Chinese. Are they interested? They are only interested in one thing, workforce who wants to work. There are many NEP graduates who cannot qualify to work in MNC coz cannot meet min. standards nor handle the pressure. So they follow the UMNO fast track program like Saiful.

All these bodoh politicians should just answer one question? Where are they getting the resources to feed the Malays whom UMNO has done all in their power to suppress their growth? UMNO puteras rob you all in broad daylight, and tell you that the Chinese and Indians are the culprit.

Muslims do not pay tax because they pay zakat, while other religions cannot claim our tithes and offerings as tax deductions. The non-Muslims are paying taxes for the roads and parks and maintenance for the entire Malaysians to enjoy.

Now those who are enjoying the benefits want to slay the golden goose. They only want the golden eggs and they are stupid enough to think that by slaying the golden goose, they will get all the eggs. Well, many golden geese (Chinese, Indians, foreign investors) have flown off to better pasteurs. Now with no golden eggs, UMNO wants all Malays to remain as clueless as ever. If not for Malaysia-Today, everything that the Chinese and Indians have endured all these years would never be documented and highlighted.

So let's focus on today and tomorrow. Where does the govt intend for our human capital to be placed? In the govt sector, in bio medicine, engineering, business, finance, research and development? What? Najib only announced stimulus package but we have no idea where the money has gone. Certainly not in education.

If we know which sector of industry that are receiving higher investment, then our schools must be able to churn out sufficient and relevant workforce for these investors. Indonesia, India, China, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand all have their domestic workforce, but Malaysia has to import from Indonesia or Bangladesh, because we have NEP grads who refuse to work for less, they rather starve and appear on TV3 eating grass.

Let's get this straight, non-Malay companies WANT to employ Malay graduates, but they are not willing to work hard and upskill. Do you know that if a Malay is unhappy with their work, they'd rather quit and starve than to go through the pressure? We used to have English as an upper hand, nowadays it's just as bad as a Vietnamese ("no Inggeris").

NEP's biggest failure is not to provide Malays with self-motivation and good work ethics. One can have 5 MBAs but without these you go nowhere in the private sector. But the dirty ethics will win you a top post in BN.

Please stay in the present. History of Malaysia is getting quite boring. But today we can make history, let's hope it is a good history for our children.
report abuse
disagree 7
agree 37
...
written by Davy McChester, July 14, 2009 03:22:38
Some parts of this article may require verification so as not to distort history. However,should the writer have other intentions which we are not aware of ,I would rather not comment. Let the intent play out to the people it is directed at.Cheers !
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 6
...
written by *********, July 14, 2009 12:46:38
Najib planning Perak style coup d'etat in Selangor and Kedah...More http://*********.********.com/...html#links
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM