A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow No Holds Barred arrow Is it UMNO or MCKK that should be credited?

Is it UMNO or MCKK that should be credited? PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Friday, 10 July 2009 16:49

Image

The Merdeka movement or UMNO was not a ‘peoples’ movement but an elite class movement. And this is something not only the Malays but all Malaysians as well need to understand.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

We hear a lot of chatter about how Umno ‘fought’ for Merdeka or independence in 1946. Well, if there really was a ‘fight’ as they claim, it was a bloodless fight and it was not until 11 years later in 1957 that Malaya actually saw Merdeka. In the other countries around us they saw Merdeka a decade earlier because they spilled blood to gain independence. That proves you just can’t fry the egg unless you break the shell. Sometimes bloodshed is necessary to achieve the result.

Anyway, whatever UMNO might say, it was not ‘the people’ who ‘fought’ for Merdeka. 99% of ‘the people’ were farmers, fishermen and kampong (village) folks. Most never went to school and even if they did (some like the late Tun Gaffar Baba did go to school) it was to a Malay school and only until standard six (like Tun Gaffar). There were no Malay secondary schools at that time and certainly no colleges or universities.

So, who ‘fought’ for Merdeka? No, it was not ‘the people’. ‘The people’ were mostly uneducated and quite ignorant about matters of government, independence and so on. ‘The people’ would accept anyone who ruled the country whether it were the sultans, the Thais, the Portuguese, the Dutch, the British or the Japanese. They would kowtow to any ‘ruler’ and call all of them ‘tuan’.

The real ‘fighters’ of Merdeka was the intelligentsia -- the writers, the poets, the journalists, the civil servants and the elite or aristocracy -- in short, the educated class. In fact, most of the early UMNO leaders were orang istana (palace people) like Onn Jaafar, Tunku Abdul Rahman, Tun Razak, Hussein Onn and whatnot. And these people were not only associated with the palace but received an English education as well.

In short, the majority of the ‘Merdeka fighters’ were ‘brown Englishmen’ who spoke English better than Englishmen. Just imagine Winston Churchill delivering his speech and that would be how the early Malays sounded like.

So this propaganda about ‘the people’ forming UMNO to fight for Merdeka is a fallacy. It was the privileged class that planted the seeds of Merdeka. And it had nothing to do with Malay nationalism because quite a number of these people could not speak Malay as well as they could speak English. And there was nothing ‘Malay’ about most of them. They dressed in pants and wore a tie, drank brandy after dinner, had tea and cakes at 4.00pm, and toasted the Queen with wine.

In those days, you would hardly find a Malay house without a well-stocked bar. I am talking about the upper class Malays of course, the 1% elite, the English-educated class, and not the 99% of ‘the people’.

The Merdeka movement or UMNO was not a ‘peoples’ movement but an elite-class movement. And this is something not only the Malays but all Malaysians as well need to understand. Of course, along the way, UMNO was ‘hijacked’ and they rewrote history to make it appear like the rakyat-at-large, ‘the people’, were the true ‘fighters’ of Merdeka.

Let me repeat that. There was no ‘fight’ and it was not the rakyat that ‘fought’ for Merdeka. Merdeka was ‘negotiated’ and it was the ‘palace people’ and the ruling class or elite class that spearheaded the Merdeka movement.

UMNO is misleading Malaysians. They are saying that the elite class ‘sold out’ to the British and it was the rakyat that ‘saved’ this country. No, the rakyat just stood by and did nothing. The privileged class was the one that ‘took up arms’ to claim independence from the British. So let history be told in its proper perspective.

Below is an article from the MCOBA (Malay College Old Boys Association) website written by JakLi that explains everything.

*****************************************

MCKK and Malay Nationalism


This article explores the role played by MCKK in the rise of Malay nationalism. The article covers:

   1. The Early Seeds of Malay Nationalism
   2. Education of Malay Boys to become Administrators
   3. Za'ba: A Dedicated and Nationalistic Teacher in MCKK
   4. Advancement of Malay Nationalistic Cause in the 1920s
   5. Gaining Wider Acceptance in the 1930s
   6. Malay Nationalism and Unity Tested
   7. Old Boys on the Road to Independence
   8. Leading UMNO and Leading the Nation
   9. Strategizing for Independence
  10. Charting the Nation's Future after Independence

The early seeds of Malay Nationalism was sowed by Sultan Idris Murshidul ‘Azzam of Perak

Sultan Idris Murshidul ‘Azzam of Perak was a far-sighted Malay Ruler who saw the need for young Malays to be equipped with modern education if they were to succeed in life. His Highness and fellow Rulers pressed the British to found the Malay College where sons of the Malay upper class (later on to include commoners) would be educated. His stand for Malay rights helped to sow the seeds of Malay nationalism and with Malay College the nationalistic spirit began to grow.

The British provided the tools for the education of Malay boys to become administrators

Much encouragement had come from R.J. Wilkinson, a noted Malay scholar and educationist, who wanted Malay boys to become ‘a vigorous and intelligent race of young men’ who were strong-minded and able to stand on their own feet. European teachers at the College saw to it that this noble purpose was achieved.

The British needed a pool of qualified Malays to assist them in the administration of the country and graduates of the MCKK with the right education and personal qualities were sought. They had proven themselves to be able administrators and worthy of the trust placed upon them.

MCKK boys were inspired by a dedicated and nationalistic teacher in Zainal Abidin bin Ahmad, better known as Za’ba

Zainal Abidin Ahmad or Za’ba was a teacher at the Malay College between 1921 and 1923. His nationalistic writings and propagation of a modernist Islam made him an icon in the Malay society. As a teacher, he inspired the boys to be proud of their Malay roots. He helped them to publish a Malay magazine in jawi called ‘Semaian’ just before he left the College.

Strong ties with MCKK promoted the advancement of Malay nationalistic cause in the 1920s

The Malay Rulers who had accepted British rule began to question the encroachment to their power under the Residential System, Sultan Iskandar of Perak went to the extent of going to London to press for a policy of decentralization. The British acceded to this wish and had taken various steps to return the power of the Rulers in their States. This helped to advance the cause of Malay nationalism.

When the Federal Council was constituted in 1927, it included three Malay members representing the Rulers. Among them was Dato Abdullah of Rembau, who was an old Collegian and Raja Chulan who was chairman of the Malay College Board of Governors. They not only voiced the need for Malays upliftment, but believed in education as a means to achieve progress. Their erudite speeches were typical of modern Malay minds at their best.

Malay Nationalism gained wider acceptance in the 1930s

Stirrings of Malay nationalism came to be felt in the 1930’s with ordinary Malays being influenced by developments in the Middle East and nearby at home, Indonesia. An old Collegian, Ishak Haji Muhammad, refused to be inducted into the Civil Service by the British. Instead, through his satirical novels such as Putera Gunung Tahan, he agitated for the return of indigenous rule.

At the same time Malays in the Peninsula began to form associations (persatuan) to fight for their interests, including participation in government administration, the economy and education. One such association was led by an old Collegian, Tengku Ismail bin Tengku Mohd Yasin. He and several others managed to hold two national congresses to discuss related matters before the World War II.

One negative result of the World War II was the British’s loss of faith in the Malays despite the loyalty shown by Malay leaders to the British government. Among Malay Collegians, Raja Aman Shah and Captain Yazid Ahmad, had fought to their death to help defend the British in Malaya and Singapore.

Malay Nationalism and Unity Tested

The British hatched a political scheme by the name of Malayan Union, which would unify the country and put an end to the myth that Malay Rulers had a right to their States via agreements that had been signed. The country would be thrown open to all races who were domiciled, Malay special rights abolished and the Rulers relegated to an inferior position as religious heads.

The Malays felt that the scheme, if implemented, would cause their demise as a people. Za’ba by now leading the Selangor Malay Association realized the grave danger the Malays were in and acted in concert with other Malay community leaders to rise and thwart the scheme. He proposed that Dato’ Onn lead the struggle.

Old Boys on the road to Independence

At the First All Malaya Malay Congress in March 1946, it was decided that a political party by the name of United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) be formed as the vehicle to realize the Malay aspiration. The method used should be through peaceful negotiations rather than physical confrontation as was the norm in the struggle for independence elsewhere.

Dato’ Onn, an old boy of the College, became its first President when the party was launched at the Istana Besar, Johor Bahru in 1946. A well-known figure for championing the Malay causes, he was imbued with strong nationalistic spirit and fought with vigour until the Malayan Union Plan was shelved.

UMNO General Assemblies, which debated policies and steps to be taken in the struggle against the Malayan Union, were often held in the palaces of Malay Rulers. They were invariably old Collegians who identified themselves with UMNO for its defense of the Malay traditional position besides having a modern outlook.

Among the policy-makers around Dato’ Onn were a coterie of old Collegians such as Dato’ Zainal Abidin Abas, Dato’ Nik Ahmad Kamil, Raja Ayob Raja Bhot and Dato’s Hamzah Abdullah. Experienced in law and modern administration, they were able to assist Dato’ Onn in the complex negotiations with the British to replace the Malayan Union with the Federation of Malaya Agreement.

Leading UMNO and leading the Nation

UMNO was not just a political party. Right from the beginning it had drawn plans for the improvement of the Malay in various fields encompassing the economy, education and social progress. Its National Education Funds had awarded scholarships to bright Malay boys to study at the MCKK in the years after the war.

Malay College graduates, who held important posts in the administration, towed the British line in order to achieve upward mobility. But they began to question the policy which had hindered their progress. As aspiring nationalists they were prepared to rid of the British who had come to doubt the existence of the Malay College as an institution. With their modern education and understanding of democracy, they were the most effective for negotiating for self-rule.

When the Federation of Malaya was established February 1948 to replace the Malayan Union, an agreement was signed by the Malay Rulers and the British to give effect to the new political arrangement. Malays Rights were restored and the Rulers regained their former status. The Mentris Besar who were appointed thereon were mostly Malay Collegians, so was the first Speaker of the Federal Legislative Council.

On the Federation Day itself, the College held a special celebration with the UMNO flag hoisted by the headmaster and flying side by side with the flags of the Malay States and the Union Jack. The UMNO flag, the biggest of its kind in the country, was presented to the College by the boys themselves, reflecting their heightened national spirit and awareness of political development around them. It was a day of significance that bound the College with the party of the future.

Strategizing for Independence

A new development in UMNO had caused Dato’ Onn to relinquish his post and Tunku Abdul Rahman took over as President of UMNO in August 1951. Tun Abdul Razak, a friend of the Tunku during their student days in Britain became the deputy. He was a former Head Boy at the College and had been the UMNO Youth Leader at the time of his election. Many important tasks of the party were undertaken by him.

In the formation of the Alliance Party, Tun Razak was among the central UMNO figures that were involved in the negotiations to spell out the rights of each community in the country. This was soon followed by the mission to London to seek Malayan Independence. The Alliance representatives included Tun Abdul Razak while on the Ruler’s side Tan Sri Nik Ahmad Kamil, an old boy, was among the four to represent them.

Charting the nation’s future after independence

After the complex negotiations involving the Alliance leaders, the British and the Malay Rulers’ representatives that led to independence, Tun Razak was given the onerous task of collating the numerous proposals that had been forwarded by the Alliance side to be submitted to Reid Commission for its consideration. The Merdeka Constitution was promulgated based broadly on the Alliance proposals.

With independence achieved came the task of nation-building, not the least of which was bringing the races together and developing a prosperous economy for the benefit of all. The Yang di-Pertuan Agong or King became the symbol of this unity and common purpose, while the political leaders together with the administrators, many of whom were Collegians, harnessed their energies towards the realization of this goal.

12 December 2008
http://www.mcoba.org/news/2-mckknews/13-mckk-and-malay-nationalism-

Comments (38)Add Comment
...
written by MyBUDAK, July 10, 2009 17:04:59
UMNO just a delivery boy, open up the book and rewrite the whole story without the original author consents.this UMNO still alive till today because got TDM feeding them with Rakyat bloods.and today they still sucking Rakyat bloods, but some had expended to Mongolia; drink Mongolian women bloods without blinking their eyes.

Today Malaysian still can recognise this perpetrators to run the country.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 74
...
written by veseti, July 10, 2009 17:10:28
fought for independence? hello? brits were not able to take care of any countries tht were under it after the world war. They simply wanted to cut loose dead weight. Tunku Abdul Rahman was a hero of circumstances. He and his style of politics was too lenient hence nothing was really solved. Thts why he choose to let Singapore go in 1963. He couldnt hold a candle to LKY. The social contract...Wht social contract?? it was a mutual understanding of the time. Things are diff now. back then any indian or chinese can go back to china or india. Now where can? Stupid mentality prevails and real intellects are forced to do their "hijrah".... wht hope is there for a country which cant read its own history and examine it objectively and truthfully.
report abuse
disagree 11
agree 93
...
written by alarcarte, July 10, 2009 17:12:08
Very true! I still remember us calling the Orang Putih TUAN, seeing pictures of Malay elites drinking alcoholic drinks with orang putih in News paper, nobody raised an eyebrow if the Malays got "Mabuk" in the parties, there were no Police to nap them for "Mabuking", those were the days...

History are meant to be twisted to ones advantage, there was no "fighting" for Merdeka but only negotiations, after milking Malaya until almost drying up then the Orang Putih gave up and handed the country to the Malay Elites.


report abuse
disagree 1
agree 51
...
written by treeman1957, July 10, 2009 17:15:20
And they talk about the "struggle" for independence. After independence was achieved, UMNO continues to "struggle" for a whole gamut of other things. If at all there were struggles for independence in Asia, we have to look to the Philippines, India and Indonesia. There the masses i.e. the ordinary man in the street had to really struggle and fight for independence in every sense of both those words. For Malaya and later Malaysia, RPK is so right...independence was negotiated but that in no way should take any credibility off from the group of people (the elite as RPK put it) who undertook the "negotiations". So many inaccuracies have been deliberately planted into the history books which our children use in school...just ask eminent historians like Prof Emeritus Khoo etc.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 54
...
written by mick_err_stan, July 10, 2009 17:30:26
Born - November 1957. Merdeka ! Merdeka ! Merdeka!
Proud to be Malaysian ! Study in Sekolah Kebangsaan Rendah & Tinggi. No racial problems. Grade 2 (M.C.E.) non-Malay do not get promoted to Lower 6. Join college, study oversea. Been paying taxes since 1982. Pendatang ! Pendatang ! Pendatang !

Now, not so proud Malaysian. Do not see bright future for my next generation. Looking for alternative. I will be the last Malaysian in my family line.


report abuse
disagree 5
agree 78
...
written by krising1, July 10, 2009 17:30:58
Peace be with you. Another point RPK. After WW II, the Americans told the British to dissolve their empire as American ideals did not permit "slavery". Malaysia would have got its independence sooner if not for the emergency. Correct me if I am wrong. It is also important to note that Tun Mahathir had no role to play in this! He only tried to portray that he was involved. Peace be
report abuse
disagree 4
agree 36
...
written by eeyaw, July 10, 2009 17:49:48
I even venture to say that the British gave back Malaysia without much of a prompting or threat since they know its a matter of time that they have to do the right thing.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 26
...
written by Bigjoe99, July 10, 2009 17:57:59
Historically speaking, the communist was a major factor in our independence, no doubt about that. The issue really, if there were no communist, would our independence, while delayed, would look different? Would the non-Malays who were largely towkay-clan organised be so eager to work with the Malays for independence? The likes of Lee Kuan Yew was inspired to fight for independence because of the British failure with the Japanese. But the strait Chinese were largely merchants/business would look at it from a profit point of view only. I say the Chinese would have stayed out of it so long as it was profitable to do so and only would have been active only if the British failed administer properly or the Malays could offer something the British would/could not. So I believe that it would have been more protracted and the Malays would have to gurantee absolute equality to non-Malays before independence could have been had - if not for the communist.

The fact of the matter is without the communist, independence would be less hurried, it would be more eventful, likely the royals would have been marginalised completely, the original constitution would have been better written, closer to what the final intention of the Reid Commission report.
report abuse
disagree 4
agree 31
...
written by Braino, July 10, 2009 18:23:36
So the truth is that there was no fighting and bloodshed...but just a peaceful handover. How much they have lied and continue to lie...shame has no effect on liars!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 30
...
written by batsman, July 10, 2009 18:24:36
Essentially it was the same in India although there was quite a bit of blood spilled with respect to the fight for independence.. Ghandhi himself was killed by a low class fanatic. All the top leaders of the Indian Congress were well educated English speaking Indians, almost all of whom were from the higher castes.

I can't say whether they swilled whiskey and smoked cigars or not, but India today is ruled by a high class English speaking elite.

Is that why 75% of Malaysians (according to chedet) prefer Maths and Science to be taught in English?
report abuse
disagree 3
agree 16
...
written by Zeroed, July 10, 2009 18:44:27
I mean seriously. What's with UMNO anyway. I mean if u do not have a sensational history that depicts u the heroes of this nation is one thing. But to hallucinate something out of thin air and pawn it as your own is just lame.
What's next? that Hang Tuah is the true founder of the very original UMNO and u get some 12 year old kid to photoshop the some batu bersurat claiming so on TVTiga and Berita Harian?
Or what?That industrialization during the colonial time was a radical move of the Illuminati to achieve One World Order, colonizing Malaya was part of the plan, and that Kerismuddin was so courages enough to volunteer himself to travel back in time (made possible by some really ultra secret time travel project in Bangi by a team of highly intelligent scientist of course, nurtured, sponsored, funded by UMNO and of course too humble to even submit their experiment papers to be publish or consider Nobel Prize nominations) to intercept and prevent the hitman that was suppose to massacre that bunch of people who went to negotiate with the British for our nation's independance. And of course, since our very otak pandai scientist are too humble n low key to tell the world of their breakthrough on the greatest discovery human mankind has ever embarked.Kerismuddin thought he might as well follow the drift by not claiming HERO! what?!Apa lagi?UMNO ada apa cerita lagi!
What U have is NEP, cronyism, nepotism, marginalization, polarization and discrimination that weaken our beloved natin today! The things they come up with really make me damn tulan only!
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 26
...
written by KotaDamansara73, July 10, 2009 18:44:31
RPK,

Are you saying that a bunch of Malays, who are more English than the Englishman, dreak tea and sip wine all the way to Merdeka?
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 34
...
written by raven1958, July 10, 2009 19:15:16
Was Chin Peng from MCKK....?
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 14
...
written by Pakyeh, July 10, 2009 19:21:19
Hey RPK ! How come the left leaning leaders are left out of the equation ???
This a damned bias history!!!
Where is Burhanuddin Hilmi, Chin Peng, and a few others includin Arab educated Malays position in the equation.???

Read more "The Real Heroes of Merdeka" at ...

http://warongpakyeh.********.com
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 24
...
written by Pakyeh, July 10, 2009 19:32:14
As for Independence/Merdeka, it was all a conn job by the British. All things British are still being used espacially "paper money and the Banking system"whose purpose was to keep Malaysians as slaves to the Kafirnomics type of economy and still maintain the British/Zionist as Masters, because they are the Creator of paper/false money.
To date we are still being conned by the British/Zionist bankers.

Read more "Kafirnomics Vs Islamnomics...at...

http://warongpakyeh.********.com
report abuse
disagree 6
agree 5
...
written by Sabahfan, July 10, 2009 20:03:22
YES rpk, we all know about the real story of Independence. we can still see the b and w documentary of Tunku abd Rahman negotiating the independence.So where was the fight? He was welcomed and chaufferred by the British like a dignitary. Thats not how the Britons treated the Argentine for the Falkland wars even in the recent years.
For malaysia the british were begging the malays to take back their country, they were not wanted, to the british they were a liability instead of an asset. and for the lies by UMNO regime, this is enough for the people to get rid of the elite UMNO buggers once and for all.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 21
...
written by arazak, July 10, 2009 20:10:48
Dear Pete,

I would also like to highlight that fighting for “freedom” in this country does not confine to the MCKK connection only. Well it was not “merdeka” from the British, but “merdeka” from the Japanese. And mind you, there are many non-Malays that have really fought and shed their blood. These are some of the heroes which have nothing to do with MCKK but have fought for the country risking theirs and their family lives;

1. Lim Bo Seng – a guerilla fighter from Force 136 corps. He was arrested and tortured to death by the Japanese at Batu Gajah Prison. On his graved, a memorial inscribing these words, ‘He died. . ., a martyr to the cause of a liberated Malaya and to his loyalty to his comrades. . .”.

2. Sybil Kathigasu – the good doctor who risked her life by providing medical teatment to injured freedom fighters in Ipoh. She also sent the guerilla fighters medicines. Eventually, she and her husband (also a doctor) were caught and were tortured in the Japanese Military Prison in Ipoh. The Japanese asked her to help them, meaning betray Malaya. In reply she asked the Japanese sergeant whether he would betray his Emperor. “Of course not”, he answered. Hence, she replied, “ If you would not betray your country and your Emperor, you have no right to ask me to turn traitor to mine”.

3. Gucharan Singh aka Singa Malaya.
A person who irritates the Japanese with his counter-propaganda leaflets which he hid in the frame of his bicycle. He also sabotaged the Japanese occupiers by blowing trains carrying fuel for the Japanese army. Was caught once, but managed to escape and continue with his activities of distributing flyers and sabotaging trains.

There are also many others that should be remembered for risking their lives fighting for this country, and they are no MCKK or Tuan Melayu UMNO!
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 61
...
written by cruzeiro, July 10, 2009 20:44:10
MCKK or Umno, how come nothing is mentioned about the role of the Brits in supporting Umno, while suppressing the common man who was really doing the fighting? How about the fact that, it was the fight by these "leftists" which had aided Umno in gaining the "legitimacy" for support of the "White Tuans"?

What was the role of the "evil" US of A and the Atlantic Charter with the Brits (on board HMS Prince of Wales, prior to direct US involvement in the war), in assuring the New World Order in which Malaya was assured its independence?
You're right about one thing though - the so-called independence was definitely negotiated, and the Brits chose their negotiating partners for obvious reasons ....
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 14
...
written by cruzeiro, July 10, 2009 20:52:17
batsman,
You definitely have overlooked a large part of Indian History. The fight for Independence in India started long before the Congress - and the Brits spared no ammo in massacres they conducted in horrific methods.
Yes - the elite did win it in the end sipping on whiskey and cognac (sparing a few) "peacefully". But they suffered the indignity of incarceration on many occasions - and struggle against the Brits they definitely did! And, they never neglected to honor the heroes - no matter what the method of their struggle was.
Can we say the same about our guys who "won Merdeka"??
I guess not .....
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 10
...
written by KotaDamansara73, July 10, 2009 20:53:19
raven1958,

Chin Peng is from MCKK also. He is one of those non-malays who manage to get in to the MCKK through very strong connections.

I think Lim Goh Thong and Tony Fernandez is also as important as those who fought for independence. They show the world, that Malaysians can also compete with white man, while the UMNO malays play politics and plunders the nation's wealth.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 18
...
written by asguard, July 10, 2009 21:31:42
Please don't dream of the pasts! We are already in present day...where UMNO isn't the UMNO of old but of corrupted one...
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 15
...
written by me_in, July 10, 2009 21:33:16
The first time i heard about MERDEKA was in 1956.Tunku Abdul Rahman came back from London. He announced the date of Merdeka at Bandar Hilir Padang.Malacca. I was then 11 yrs old.My late father cycled to the padang with me as a passenger.We heard the fiery speeches and went home. It was a chance to see Malacca Town
I think Tan Cheng Lock, Sambanthan , Ghafar Baba were there.
The Padang is gone now with some development...probably to cronies.

Those were the days
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 11
...
written by hellosunshine, July 10, 2009 22:29:58
Actually, the Malays are smart and can be taught to be independent and self reliant as shown by these old boys. It's umno that's caused the Malays to be dependent on crutches with their systematic destruction of our education system from one of the best education system in SEA to one that is now in flip flop deep doo doo. Our kids could have now been employed globally by the multinational companies like in Singapore if we had stuck to English as one of the compulsory medium of instruction. Now, our kids can't be world beaters but can only be jaguh kampong whereas the umnoputras/bnputras' kids are sent to internationals schools and overseas universities to return and continue the plundering and looting. Our children's future is now in our hands. Do we still want to stick our heads in the sand and let them continue raping us???? smilies/angry.gif
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 30
...
written by tokbahaman, July 10, 2009 22:55:34
Dear RPK. Where do JakLi put Dato Maharajalela, Tok Bahaman and Mat Kilau. Chin Peng and the CPM. The MPAJA? Angkatan Pemuda Islam (API) and Kesatuan Melayu Muda (KMM)?

Not all the the Malays who raised toast to the Queen toasted champagne....some though, did the toast to the Queen and genuinely repected the Queen but it was not champagne in their glasses but diluted tea. I can vouch for that.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 9
...
written by tokbahaman, July 10, 2009 23:02:48
Of course the boys of MCKK did play an important role. That is an undeniable fact.There were a lot of factors that led to the declaration of independence and it could never have been achieved without the incessant action of the radical groups.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by johnT, July 10, 2009 23:21:43
Dear Pete

I Still remember your speech that the first person who negotiate for merdeka from the British is Tun HS Lee. Hope fully this century we can see Malaysia Merdeka from racist.
report abuse
disagree 2
agree 3
...
written by Raja Petra, July 10, 2009 23:44:45
Aiyah! Read the article again properly. This is the trouble with those who never went to MCKK. Of course there were many others who also 'fought' for Merdeka, the leftist group in particular. Read the article again and try to understand what you are reading. And also read what I previously wrote over the last 20 years. Maybe I should write parts 2 and 3 of this article and turn it into a mini-series.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 5
...
written by Daryl, July 11, 2009 00:14:47
To BNUMNO

Just like what Janet Jackson sings on 'What have you done for me lately". Also, what is your plan for future Malaysia with all the 'outstanding' politicians, judges, PDRM officers and civil servants you have in your pockets. Without a total overhaul we will be at par with Cambodia in the very near future. Oh Indonesia stopped politicizing race and religion and see how their future is now.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 4
...
written by BAHAZIN, July 11, 2009 00:42:52
Our independent was given on a silver platter, no fighting or struggles.
That is the reason why Malaysians never value liberty and freedom. Other
nations fought to death for independent such as USA, France etc. Thus, the
Malaysians indifferent attitude towards ISA, Police Acts, Press Acts, College
and University Act, Sedition Acts etc.Lets face the fact, we are still mentally shackled and colonized by the displaced British, it's UMNO.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 9
...
written by AIS, July 11, 2009 02:43:58
France fought for independence, that's funny..Haiya don't la ....

Malaysia's struggle for independence might not have been a nation wide uprising of arms against the British but it was definitely not presented on a silver plate. Many people spilled blood and tears for it. Also not to forget that foreign european presence in the peninsular of Malaysia started well before many others in the region. There were many struggles between the presence of the portugese, the dutch, the japanese and the british. Some struggles might not have been recorded in history book but human nature dictates that the majority of us do not like having a master to bow to....
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 2
...
written by Davy McChester, July 11, 2009 03:10:40
Neither Chinese nor any Indian leaders were involved.............the British put them aside and Malaya got its freedom ??? If that is history,no wonder the Chinese and Indians are still referred to as pendatangs.Let us see some hard statistics in the then administation of schools and Government. Who were this English educated clerks,teachers ? What about the road and rail supervisors,workers,clerks ,etc ?
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 6
...
written by LFLee, July 11, 2009 03:57:55
Dear RPK,

That piece of article missing contribution from other races as well - communist (member including different races) play a part in this process and they are the one giving out lives.

UMNO claim all the credits~

And where the f**k is the 'social contract' document was? This damn 'social contract' is our "National Treasure" that UMNO goons need to find out. If you can show me the 'social contract', damn, I will shut my mouth and spend the rest of my life trying to go back to 'Tong San'. Else stop mentioning this stupid, racist 'social contract' OK?


We will have real 'Independence' when UMNO/BN is gone!!!


report abuse
disagree 0
agree 11
...
written by Pakyeh, July 11, 2009 06:45:33
OK RPK. I read the article again. What you meant to say is that it was not really a merdeka but a replacement of the British bogoise/elite with the MCKK bogoise/elite. I agree with you. The peoples revolution has not started yet! Therefore everybody! Lets start a Peoples Revolution! Lets get rid of the MCKK and UMNO/BN!

Read more about the "Revolution pt1&2 at...

http://warongpakyeh.********.com
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by cruzeiro, July 11, 2009 08:58:49
Ya la, Pete...
I know what you were saying - I was just making another point. Thats all- not criticizing you.
Sorry if you or anybody else thought so (it sure sounded like that- I agree). I may not have read all you wrote - but I sure did read enough from your old archives those days (in the old MT/ Loony Malaysia) to know what you mean.
Come to think of it, maybe a rehash of those good ol' articles would be a good idea - after all, MT wasn't what it is today. We all could gain much from them.
Maybe a new column/ mini-series - History As I see It - would be in order ....?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by SiHangChai, July 11, 2009 09:37:25
Unfortunately none of UMNo or MCKK has done significantly in securing merdeka for malaya. It is the PKM, Parti Komunis Malaya who went against the bloody British regime that spurred and led the raises of major rebellion of the rakyat to seek independent. So, Hail the great Chin Peng. This is a fact, but you wont find this in Malaysia history books esepcially if still governed by the denial symdrome of UMNO.
report abuse
disagree 3
agree 6
...
written by cheemengwong, July 11, 2009 13:40:59
Dear RPK,

I would have thought that Ghafar Baba went to university because he got 2 BA degrees... BA,BA.

Have a great weekend!
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 0
...
written by penang53, July 11, 2009 20:33:58
The Brit used the same tactics they refined in India by co-opting the Anglicized Indian eg. Nehru who are more English than Indian to "fight" for Independence. The Colonial rulers are deathly afraid of the real fighter for independence - Ghandi and would not negotiate with him. It must be a god-sent that Ghandi was assassinated paving the way for the Brit to "work" with Nehru to steal the independence movement. The Istana people of Malaysia provided a brown face to enable the Brit to continue stealing from us. Why is it that the ruling class harp about the so call Chinese (who are citizen) "control" of the Malaysian economy when it is the foreigners (Brit) who control over 70% of the economy. They are replacing class-war with race-war and UMNO is the enabler of this, since it protect the Malay upper-crust
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by Adely, July 15, 2009 12:54:09
Well well if its not the MCgaygay… however I back to differ on the wholeness of the attribution who fought for merdeka. We shall not forget the contribution of CPM in the whole works. Due to the pressure put upon the British from CPM arm resistance and the right wing movement in the light of Ahamd Boestamam, Rahim Kajaai etc, British has no choice but to work along with the lesser of 2 evil – the nationalist happened to be MCGayGay boys.
Hence, it is basically the works of several groups… and sadly enough communist lost the struggle not only in Malaysia but also worldwide. As a matter of fact, in the Quran clearly stated that forgiving is the way of Allah; and why we are so adamant not to allow Chin Peng return to SITIAWAN? That is a blasphemy to Allah. AND THOSE IN POWER CLAIMED THAT THEY ARE MUSLIM...
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM