A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow News/Commentaries arrow Malaysiakini accused of ethics breach

Malaysiakini accused of ethics breach PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 02:38

(MySinchew) - A bilingual portal, www.malaysiafreenews .com, Monday took news portal Malaysiakini.com to task for what it alleges as breach of journalistic ethics over its recent article attacking a Malaysian tycoon.

In a posting today, Hu Yan Jiu Qu said, “Just by a mere email, Malaysiakini started their onslaught on Tan Sri Tiong Hiew King, a move that is deemed unprofessional and seriously in breach of impartiality in news reporting.”

It said the Malaysiakini report is based on an email by a “dubious foundation,” (in apparent reference to the Swiss-based Bruno Manser Fund -BMF).

The article pointed out that, “This foundation itself is a highly controversial non-governmental body and allegations made in their statement were merely supported by speculations.”

Basing on the email from BMF, Malaysiakini posted a hard hitting story three days ago titled: “Campaign to strip timber tycoon’s knighhood.”
In the report, Malaysiakini said,”Two weeks after Malaysian timber tycoon cum media mogul Tiong Hiew King was awarded a knighthood by Queen Elizabeth II, environmental groups have launched a campaign to strip him of the honour over his ‘illegal logging record’”.

It also said BMF, in a statement emailed to Malaysiakini, lamented that the Queen was “ill-advised by her Papua New Guinea ministers” in conferring the award on the billionaire.

It alleged that, “Tiong is commonly known to be one of the chief people responsible for widespread illegal logging in both Papua New Guinea and other countries.”

Today’s Malaysiafreenews posting claimed that BMF have accused the wrong party of illegal logging in Papua New Guinea and has blamed it on Tiong’s Rimbunan Hijau.

Malaysiakini alleged that Tiong, “has been accused by environment groups for the destruction of PNG rainforests, corruption and violation of human rights.”

Malaysiafreenews defended Tiong by saying the Rimbunan Hijau Group, adhering to their principle of giving back to the society, “took the lead in bringing economic development to PNG with the ultimate intention of benefiting the people of that country.”

It is also due to recognition of their contribution, the article said that the PNG government has recommended Tan Sri Tiong for a knighthood, “but again parties with agenda known only to them have seized this as an opportunity to slam unfair comments with the intention of maligning and destroying Tiong.”

“I would like to ask Malaysiakini a good question, if anyone from Malaysiakini has received an award, and their award was stripped off due to certain news report casting doubts onto the loyalty of your news portal to the nation, how would you feel or react?”

The writer said when there is a serious allegation made against any individual, he/she must have the right to reply and be given the opportunity to rebut any untruthful report, and his side of story should be accorded with equal space.
It said Malaysiakini’s report on the campaign to strip Tiong’s knighthood has denied the right of the person in question to offer his side of story and hence setting very bad example to the profession.

“Malaysiakini has breached the very basic principle of journalism and abused their rights as the fourth estate, and this would eventually would cost them dearly,” it added.

Comments (12)Add Comment
...
written by educationist, June 30, 2009 06:08:30
The test of the pudding is in the eating.
Over the years I've come across numerous articles that Rimbunan Hijau has been engaged in dubious logging practices in PNG.
Yet, Tiong has been nominated to be honoured by the government of PNG.
However knowing how things work in a third world country, that can hardly be a surprise.
I will expect, though , there'll be some sort of screening by the Queen's office.
Bottom line is, Tiong is knighted.
For that, yes he deserves to be congratulated!
Let's see if opponents to his knighthood can come up with concrete evidence to cause the knighthood to be withdrawn.
report abuse
disagree 4
agree 9
...
written by loosecannon, June 30, 2009 07:56:28
Tiong Hiew King of Rimbunan Hijau is the biggest rapist of the environment. When it comes to felling of timber in the world, nobody can even come close to him. Not only in Malaysia but his tentacle has spread to places like PNG. And he's using his ill-gotten wealth to try to influence our politics through his newspapers. He has reaped billions from our trees and yet one don't see his money being used to help the country. Even the natives of Sarawak are complaining that he's grabbing their land for timber and oil palm plantation.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 19
...
written by densemy, June 30, 2009 08:18:43
What's all this talk about ethics?? This is Malaysia where ethics is spelled RINGGITS

More hypocrisy
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 14
...
written by lskong, June 30, 2009 08:28:25

i suggest sinshew should declare its "potential" conflict of interest whenever it publishes a new article related to tiong or rimbunan hijau, since the paper, and all its media outlets, is owned by tiong.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 15
...
written by bexe, June 30, 2009 09:15:40
This man owns major news papers. He has every chance to rebut all he wants if he dares. So what is he waiting for?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 15
...
written by DezMalaysia, June 30, 2009 11:01:04
I trust MalaysiaKini more that that stupid Malaysiafreenews.

That Hu Yan Jiu Qu sounded like he/she was bought by Tiong Hiew King !
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 9
...
written by Sinewy, June 30, 2009 13:57:13
Malaysiafreenews, when I, as an individual, can buy industrial lot around pulau indah area for about RM 20 pre sq. ft complete with all infrastructures and ammenities from some developer, why some political joker thinks that it is reasonable for PKA, who is supposedly to be a developer, to pay RM 25 per sq. ft. for their land in pulau indah? I have previoulsy been involved in some development in pulau indah for several years and you don't need a rocket scientist to tell you that something is not right at all...can you Malaysiafreenews do some responsible journalism to help the country to prevent further waste and damages to the interest of the tax payers?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 5
...
written by Malaysian Heart, June 30, 2009 19:34:39
Honest journalism is vital for democracy, and ethical breaches by any media outlet, including Malaysiakini and MToday, must be condemned & corrected. In stark contrast with the Malaysian MSM who have functioned mainly as party mouthpieces for their owners, over the years Malaysiakini has built up a reputation for honest reporting. Whenever Malaysiakini journalists have been in breach of good journalistic practice (and they certainly have), thay have taken the responsibility & accepted the consequences, e.g. Wong Choon Mei's resignation (http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/91663). This current allegation in Malaysiafreenews should also be investigated & the results made known.

(cont'd)
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by Malaysian Heart, June 30, 2009 19:37:19
Reading Hu Yan Jiu Qu's article, http://www.malaysiafreenews.com/?p=222, as well as the original Malaysiakini report http://www1.malaysiakini.com/news/107280, here are my initial thoughts:

(cont'd)
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by Malaysian Heart, June 30, 2009 19:37:51
1) Hu accuses Malaysiakini of basing its report on "dubious" and "highly controversial" sources i.e. the Bruno Manser Fund, but does not provide verifiable evidence to support his assertion that the BMF is dubious. He might do well to realise that some people would consider Rimbunan Hijau to be "dubious" and their activities "highly controversial" too. At the end of the day, we need to see objectively verifiable evidence to decide one way or another. BMF is not the only organisation which has questioned RH's ethics & social responsibility: here (http://www.greenpeace.org/inte...st-plunder) is Greenpeace's case against RH, and here (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rimbunan_Hijau) is RH'sWikipedia entry.

(cont'd)
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by Malaysian Heart, June 30, 2009 19:38:26
2) Hu's paragraph that goes "Rimbunan Hijau Group, adhering to their principle of giving back to the society, took the lead in bringing economic development to PNG with the ultimate intention of benefiting the people of that country." seems to have come straight out of a RH corporate brochure, instead of a news report. By ignoring completely the legitimate concerns about the effects large MNC's have on the environment & society, it brings Hu's own integrity into question.

3) Hu writes about Tiong's involvement in many other industries besides logging & media. Well, owning some businesses that are run ethically and in a socially responsible way does not remove the taint of the businesses that are not.

4) Hu defends Tiong's ownership of multiple media outlets as legal. Even if it is legal, it is not good practice & tends to create a media monopoly. Countries where concern for press freedom is high have enacted laws to prevent the concentration of media power in the hands of the few. Malaysia should enact such laws too. The fact that jobs & economic growth has followed cannot justify such monopolies; it's be possible to justify creating & selling pirated DVDs with Hu's simplistic logic.

5) How someone should react when accusations have been made against him is to respond & present the evidence why such accusations are false. That is what I believe Malaysiakini would do, and that is what Tiong should do as well.

6) I agree with Hu that any person affected by a news report must have the right to self-defense and be given the opportunity to rebut any untruthful report. This is called the "right of reply" in journalistic ethics. I would like to know if Malaysiakini did contact Tiong or his representatives to get his side of the story. If they did not make a genuine effort, indeed they have violated journalistic ethics, and should be condemned for it. Let's wait for Malaysiakini's response on this issue.

7) Staying on the question of journalistic ethics: credible news organisations must fully disclose any conflicts of interest involving the writers, editors, publishers and the subjects of their reports. For example, when CNET News publishes a story that reports on a sister corporation like CBSNews.com, there is always a disclosure statement that goes like this: Disclosure: CNET News is published by CBS Interactive, which also publishes CBSNews.com. In this way, readers may judge for themselves whether to trust the report. Why did Sin Chew not disclose that they are owned by Tiong's company when they reported Hu's charges against Malaysiakini? http://www.mysinchew.com/node/26596

Fortunately, we know that Sin Chew is owned by Tiong's company. Does anyone know who owns or is sponsoring Hu and this Malaysiafreenews "bilingual portal"?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by Malaysian Heart, June 30, 2009 20:06:34
This is how pro-BN bloggers think:
http://marahku.********.com/20...other.html

They cannot see anything without adding racial twist to it. Isn't Steven Gan of Malaysiakini a chinese? The concept of right & wrong as independent from one's race is totally alien to pro-BN bloggers like this one. Let us never walk in their footsteps
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 1

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM