==> Pls visit new site at http://malaysia-today.net/ <==

Tok Sak berkata :
Seperti yang di katakana oleh Milton Friedman dalam konteks hubungan manusia dengan kerajaan atau negara.

Benar, tapi dewasa ini ramai yang mengangap babak cerita perpaduan Melayu hanya diutarakan untik tujuan kepentingan sendiri iatu membentuk kerajaan negeri di Selangor dan Kedah.
Tujuan utama adalah mengekalkan kuasa politik yang makin terhakis.
Kalau tidak kenapa sebelum PRU12 tidak ada langsung cerita yang berbaur Kerajaan Perpaduan ?

Milton Friedman juga pernah bertitah :
Governments never learn. Only people learn.

Maksudnya- kerajaan tak pernah belajar dari kesilapan, hanya rakyat yang mampu belajar dan mengubah keadaan.

Vijay Kumar Murugavell

report abuse

disagree 0

agree 11

Why must it always be Melayu instead of Malaysia?

report abuse

disagree 0

agree 4

"MALAY" as they called themselves The TRUTH was the origin of MALAYs they came from different part of INDONESIA (JAwa SUmatra SUlawasi even as far as Papua and Thousand Islands outside Australia Their forefathers were pirates and excellent Fisherman.like it or dont like.the fact and history remained as the soliditary proof! Many descended from different tribes and ethnics.by their different tonguedialect & languages.the proof was that different area in Malaysia.you encountered the differences of speaking the Bahasa Melayu Orang Asli (even with many different Tribal Identity) were the original inhabitants of this Land of Malaysia. the MALAYs came and resided at the coastals and later moved deeper into the landscape They brought along their culture and aminisme practises.that was a time LONg BEFORE ISLAM invades and been preached ThE Malays were much more civilised. The issue of "PERPADUAN" cannot be implemented fully b'coz this MALAYs carrying different bloods and different thoughts and the Spirits inside them are different

Below is a PROOF : -
Following the disputed recognition of Abdul Samad as sultan in 1860, Malay chiefs gradually became polarized into two camps—generally the lower-river versus the upper-river chiefs. The main issue concerned the lucrative collection of duties on tin exports Raja Mahdi, the dispossessed son of the previous ruler in Klang (now Kelang), seized and held the prosperous town of Klang for two years with tacit approval of dissident upper-river chiefs. When the sultan granted favours to his son-in-law Zia-ud-din, brother of the sultan of Kedah, he further alienated the dissident chiefs, and intermittent fighting commenced. At this point Chinese tin miners in the Selangor and Klang valleys began feuding over control of the mines The miners predominantly belonged to the Ghee Hin and Hai San secret societies, which increasingly sought allies among the Malay chiefs Thus, by 1870 the Chinese had joined opposing sides in the civil war: the Ghee Hin had joined Raja Mahdi’s forces, and the Hai San had sided with Zia-ud-din. By late 1873 Zia-ud-din, with British aid, a Pahang army, and his Chinese allies, reversed several years of setbacks and defeated Mahdi and his supporters. The war caused economic dislocation and loss of mining investments and paved the way for expansion of British control in 1874

* UMNO assasinated Abang NIZAR
* UMNO assasinated Abang Anwar Ibrahim
* UMNO tried to assasinate KHALID for the Korban cows that he had given to the Glory of Allah

report abuse

disagree 0

agree 7

UMNO will not listen to others but themselves....that they are arrogance, boastful, do stupid things without thinking twice, needs PAS only when about to die or fall into hell, playing racial cards if lost the game, screw and plunder the nation's wealth into their pockets....
The real thing of UMNO ....they don't really care about the malay unity.... what does concern them the most power and money....with this two things they can do anything they for ....!

report abuse

disagree 0

agree 2

Ya, bagi UMNO, bila ada masalah, semuanya adalah salah orang lain.

report abuse

disagree 0

agree 2

The Quran says (Translation by Dr Mohsin - Quranexplorer) (Surah Alhujurat; verse 11):
O you who believe! Let not a group scoff at another group, it may be that the latter are better than the former; Nor let (some) women scoff at other women, it may be that the latter are better than the former, Nor defame one another, nor insult one another by nicknames. How bad is it, to insult one's brother after having Faith [i.e. to call your Muslim brother (a faithful believer) as: "O sinner", or "O wicked"]. And whosoever does not repent, then such are indeed Zâlimûn (wrong-doers).
=====================
Whoever eat the chilly, let him/her taste the 'heat' (kepedasan).

report abuse

disagree 0

agree 0