A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow News/Commentaries arrow Evidence clause in DNA Bill scrapped

Evidence clause in DNA Bill scrapped PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Wednesday, 24 June 2009 10:26

(NST) A CLAUSE providing that DNA evidence introduced in court is conclusive has been dropped from the final version of the controversial Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Identification Bill 2008.

"It has to be corroborated now. It is no longer conclusive as stated earlier," Deputy Home Minister Datuk Wira Abu Seman Yusop said as he introduced nine changes to the bill at the committee stage.

The bill was passed.

He said the changes were introduced to accommodate suggestions made by members during the debate at the policy stage last year.

The changes also included some proposals by non-governmental organisations such as the Bar Council, Abu Seman said.

One of the grouses against the proposed legislation by the opposition was on the appointment of the head of the Malaysian Forensic Data Bank which, in the original text, was to be helmed by a serving police officer.

The opposition had claimed that the appointment of a police officer would constitute a conflict of interest as the police could tamper with evidence to fit their case.

However, the government has amended this clause to allow for the appointment of any serving government officer who has knowledge and expertise in DNA science.

"This change allows for people with the right qualifications to be appointed to the position of head and assistant," Abu Seman said.

Opposition members, however, argued that the bill did not say that police officers were excluded from being appointed to the position.

"The police officer can be trained in forensic science and become qualified to be appointed," argued R. Sivarasa (PKR-Subang).

Abu Seman brushed this objection aside and said the opposition should view the changes positively.

Several changes sought by the oppposition members -- Teo Nie Ching (DAP-Serdang), Dr Mohd Hatta Md Ramli (Pas-Kuala Krai), Dr Michael Jeyakumar Devaraj (PSM-Sungai Siput) and Lim Lip Eng (DAP-Segambut) -- were rejected.

The Dewan Rakyat passed the controversial Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Identification Bill 2008 after introducing nine changes to the bill at the committee stage.

Comments (7)Add Comment
...
written by gundohing, June 24, 2009 10:51:53
What happens then when a police officer trained in forensic science, becomes qualified to be appointed and yet subject to the directions of his superior officers as to the outcome of his findings which shall be in turn supportive of the prosecution's case.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 34
...
written by Spear Bing, June 24, 2009 11:28:01
PR MPs did not turn up in full swing to vote against the Bill. They just lost by one vote.

That's the most stupid strategy of the highest degree by the PR MPs. Shame on you all!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 59
...
written by hiro, June 24, 2009 12:06:21
I agree with Spear Bing. Can PR leaders please explain why they did not turn up in full force??
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 35
...
written by n2nios, June 24, 2009 12:33:35
What's the difference with having a million MP from opposition to oppose the bill.
This statement will be heard again..."Abu Seman brushed this objection aside and said the opposition should view the changes positively.".....we only can wait for the Next GE to change things..till then enjoy the show..
report abuse
disagree 5
agree 4
...
written by carribeanking7, June 24, 2009 12:45:54
Quote:
A CLAUSE providing that DNA evidence introduced in court is conclusive has been dropped from the final version of the controversial Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA) Identification Bill 2008.

"It has to be corroborated now. It is no longer conclusive as stated earlier," Deputy Home Minister Datuk Wira Abu Seman Yusop said as he introduced nine changes to the bill at the committee stage.




Out of sections 7(1),10,25,13,14 & 24. I was hoping especially sec 24 (above) must be defeated, a job well done by opposition MP's for keeping up the pressure.

Vijay Kumar Murugavell
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 5
...
written by ROBERTNGTG, June 24, 2009 14:08:26
One of the grouses against the proposed legislation by the opposition was on the appointment of the head of the Malaysian Forensic Data Bank which, in the original text, was to be helmed by a serving police officer.

The opposition had claimed that the appointment of a police officer would constitute a conflict of interest as the police could tamper with evidence to fit their case.

WITH MUSANG AND PIGTAIL STILL IN CHARGE, DSAI, START PREPARING FOR A RETURN TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM ALA CARTE SODOMY II; AT LEAST TILL GE 13.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by astina, June 24, 2009 15:05:12
they have a passed a law and the anus acted as the head .!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM