A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow From Around The Blogs arrow Malaysian Chicken Curry vs. the Big Mac

Malaysian Chicken Curry vs. the Big Mac PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Monday, 04 May 2009 11:37

In a world where corporate giants and the ‘big boys’ typically roll over the underdog, I must admit it was heart-warming to see the story of Kanages Suppiah’s court victory against the McDonald’s corporation over the former’s use of the name ‘McCurry’ for his restaurant. Apparently claiming exclusive trademark rights to the prefix ‘Mc,’ the corporate giants had gone after a regular proprietor to supposedly protect their corporate name.

After an eight-year protracted legal flip and flop, and with the Court of Appeal coming down on the side of McCurry, one is left wondering exactly why the fast-food giant has been making such a big fuss about the matter. Of course I’m all for protecting property and trademark rights. But there are also instances in which one must be reasonable, and to me it seems like the high-powered lawyers at McDonald’s have clearly lost all perspective and sense of being reasonable.

I think most reasonable people can appreciate the principle that the corporation’s trademark is “McDonald’s”, and not ‘Mc’. That being the case, the law should just not allow ridiculous and unreasonable claims that therefore, even a prefix in a name becomes exclusive and a protected name. Second, any reasonable person should also be able to appreciate that nothing about McCurry’s restaurant business comes close to the Filet-O-Fish, Big Mac, or even the Spicy Chicken McDeluxe one finds at the fast food chain.

If ever these McDonald’s lawyers decide to go to Federal Court with this case, I for one sure hope the judges use some good old fashion common sense to the law and recognise that not even a moron could confuse ‘Restoran McCurry’ with McDonald’s. Surely there’s no plausible way that the former could represent any illegal appropriation of the McDonald’s trademark.

Just maybe, as these lawyers sit around and inhale their Double Cheeseburgers, they can try to think of some better things to do with their time. (I personally would suggest they head over to Restoran McCurry and try some of the roti canai.    

G. Krishnan   
http://imagineequality.blogspot.com/

 

Comments (10)Add Comment
...
written by Richfyf, May 04, 2009 12:14:32
I wonder If I register "Curry Restorant" as a Trade mark will I be able to sue McDonal and stop the from using the work Curry in their menu?????
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 6
...
written by MasterYoda, May 04, 2009 12:23:28
I am launching:

McRosmah spicey foldover
McNajib quarter pounder
McTuya Fillet
McKutty sundae

and i'll bet McDonald's wont sue me...
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 24
...
written by MasterYoda, May 04, 2009 12:25:12
Oh ya,

and McMamak too
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 15
...
written by *********, May 04, 2009 12:35:14
What can you expect when we have Judges with the BN given titles of Tun, Tan Sri, Dato, Datuk Seri before their names...More http://*********.********.com
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by apa jadi, May 04, 2009 13:09:50
Malaysians have certainly a funny sense of copyright ownership. If Allah is copyrighted, what is that of McYYYYYY.

I only pity those Malaysian of Scottish descents, carrying a surnames McYYYYYY. They might have to change their surnames too basing on this Stupid Malaysian McDonald franchisee.

In fact McCurry's ordeal started after the "Mc" issue. The corner stall/shop(how they got approved for building is also another issue) was reduced to rubble after the case, if I am not wrong. Interesting.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 4
...
written by carribeanking7, May 04, 2009 13:38:28
There is a retaurant in Bangsar called HSBC, abbreviation for Hot & Spicy Bangsar Curry, I doubt HSBC bank would win a suit against them for exclusive use of that abbreviation, my blogger friend and I sort off co authored the term "dUMbNO" as a charesteristic of UMNO, but we liberally invite all and sundry to use this term without restriction.


Vijay Kumar Murugavell
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 5
...
written by KM Wong, May 04, 2009 13:58:02
Is McDonald's going to go after ALL the Scots too to change their names?
The cheek of them and in particular the cheek of their Malaysian franchise holder. Is it that bastard Vincent Tan??
These lawyers must have nothing better to do.
Bravo, Mr Kanages Suppiah for standing up against these bullies. Where is your restaurant? I want to go there to give you some business.
And to the rest, boycott McDonald's. After all it's PROVEN their food is not nutritional and not good for health. A good old roti with dahl is far better.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 6
...
written by lallyza, May 04, 2009 14:24:44
written by MasterYoda, May 04, 2009 12:23:28
I am launching:

McRosmah spicey foldover
McNajib quarter pounder
McTuya Fillet
McKutty sundae

and i'll bet McDonald's wont sue me...


MasterYoda....................... McRosmah spicey foldover belongs to KFC

smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1
...
written by MasterYoda, May 04, 2009 15:21:21
lallyza,

hahahahahahahaha.... now KFC is joining the band wagon too...

smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/cheesy.gif smilies/cheesy.gif smilies/cheesy.gif smilies/cheesy.gif
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 1
...
written by talk2stop, May 04, 2009 18:23:31
I think Malaysia is not playing the game according to world standard. Now I hope Malaysians undestand why foreign investors are by-passing Malaysia.
3 Cheers for Malaysia. Keep up the good work. Do not forget to kick the Yanks too.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM