A+ | A- | Reset
Home

The Limbang Story - Which one is true? PDF Print
Wednesday, 18 March 2009 22:56

We have been informed that the PM mission to Brunei is a very successful since our media told that the Brunei governmnet finally drop their claim on Limbang. According to our local media, all the matters that were being discussed were documented in the “Letter of Exchange”.

So as a naive person, I do some digs on what sort of things that being exchanged between two countries (yah, since it is called “Letter of Exchange”). Unfortunately I didn’t find the whole contents but I found other things that shocking me.

 
This is what I found in the Brunei news and 2 news by our local media. Which one is true?

> Read more >>

Comments (10)Add Comment
...
written by Namolos, March 18, 2009 23:11:38
Well...when our local media has been twisting so call "FACTS" during the past half century....what did you expect the Locals to believe in..?

The very fact that one has to dig further to find out the ''TRUTH'' speaks for itself.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 41
...
written by Commonsenses, March 18, 2009 23:19:07
Yeah U can write off the MSM especially Utusan. There was never a discussion over Limbang period.AAB went there for a holiday at the rakyat's expense. smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/grin.gif

Are Malaysian fools to believe AAB can move the earth?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 27
...
written by bknight, March 18, 2009 23:48:31
sorry i am confused, i am not born in the era of this dispute..can someone enlightened me?

report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by whiteheart, March 19, 2009 01:51:05
Almost all Malaysians knew that our beloved PM is suffering from a psychological disorder called mythomania. So, it is not surprising that what comes out from the mouth of our PM is always the opposite of reality.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 14
...
written by vaistlin, March 19, 2009 07:50:20
There was a claim over Limbang? Gosh, I must be out of touch for.....50 years?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 4
...
written by Rundukon, March 19, 2009 08:33:25
History of Sarawak: Sarawak had been a loosely governed territory under the control of the Brunei Sultanate in the early 19th century, although in the early 17th century Sarawak had her own the first and the last Sultan, Sultan Tengah. During the reign of Pangeran Indera Mahkota in 19th century, Sarawak was in chaos. Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddin II (1827-1852), the Sultan of Brunei, ordered Pangeran Muda Hashim in 1839 to restore order and it was during this time that James Brooke arrived in Sarawak. Pangeran Muda Hashim initially requested assistance but James Brooke refused. In 1841, James Brooke paid another visit to Sarawak and this time he agreed to assist. Pangeran Muda Hashim signed a treaty in 1841 surrendering Sarawak and Sinian to James Brooke. Thereafter, on 24 September 1841, Pangeran Muda Hashim bestowed the title Governor to James Brooke. He effectively became the Rajah of Sarawak and founded the White Rajah Dynasty of Sarawak, later extending his administration through an agreement with the Sultan of Brunei.


Sir James Brooke, Rajah of Sarawak.Brooke was appointed Rajah by the Sultan of Brunei on August 18, 1842; originally this territory was just the western end of later Sarawak, around Kuching. He ruled Sarawak until his death in 1868. His nephew Charles Anthoni Johnson Brooke became Rajah after his death; he was succeeded on his death in 1917 by his son, Charles Vyner Brooke, with a provision that Charles should rule in consultation with his brother Bertram Brooke[1]. The territory was greatly expanded under the White Rajahs, mostly at the expense of areas nominally under the control of Brunei. In practice Brunei had only controlled strategic river and coastal forts in much of the lost territory, and so most of the gain was at the expense of Muslim warlords and of the de facto independence of local tribes.

The Brooke dynasty ruled Sarawak for a hundred years and became famous as the "White Rajahs", accorded a status within the British Empire similar to that of the rulers of Indian princely states. In contrast to many other areas of the empire, however, the Brooke family was intent on a policy of paternalism to protect the indigenous population against exploitation. They governed with the aid of the Muslim Malay and enlisted the Ibans and other "Dayak" as a contingent militia. They also encouraged the immigration of Chinese merchants but forbade the Chinese to settle outside of towns in order to minimize the impact on the Dayak way of life. They also established the Sarawak Museum, the first museum in Borneo.

report abuse
disagree 1
agree 3
...
written by educationist, March 19, 2009 08:38:36
Definitely not our local media!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by tuahjebat, March 19, 2009 09:41:21
Ha ha...AAB claims made me laugh. Utusan writer does not know facts from fiction. I rather believe Pehin Lim Jock Seng as what he has to say than to believe AAB and his nonsense. Please la Dollah, why don't you announce that you have stopped Najis from becoming the next Prime Murderster. That and that at least the Malaysian citizen will believe you for a few minutes.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by pinsysu, March 19, 2009 09:47:14
since when can we trust our local media who do not report facts but write according to instructions received from the top?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3
...
written by Democrats, March 19, 2009 10:19:11
Pity the brunei people....their land is split into two halves by Limbang. smilies/cheesy.gif
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 3

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
The Silent Roar
 BUY THE BOOK HERE
 **STOCKS NOW AVAILABLE**
 
** SPONSORED LINKS **
Will NATO become a global army? More..
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA
People's Declaration

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM