A+ | A- | Reset
Home arrow The Blogs arrow News/Commentaries arrow Azilah: I considered problem settled when Altantuya left Razak's home

Azilah: I considered problem settled when Altantuya left Razak's home PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Monday, 19 January 2009 22:32

Maria J. Dass, The Sun

The first accused in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder trial, Chief Insp Azilah Hadri, told the High Court today he did not know if his colleague, second accused Cpl Sirul Azhar Umar, had sent Altantuya back to her hotel on the night of Oct 19, 2006.

He said he had considered political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda’s problem as “settled” when the Mongolian woman left Abdul Razak's house in Bukit Damansara after he (Azilah) advised her to do so.

Cross-examined by prosecution head Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah, Azilah said he did not ask Sirul Azhar about Altantuya after he agreed to send her back to her hotel.

“I considered Razak’s problem as settled as the woman had left his house,” said Azilah who disagreed with Tun Abdul Majid’s contention that “settled” meant Altantuya had been shot and blown up in Puncak Alam.

He also denied he had called Abdul Razak to tell him he could sleep well that night.

Last week, Azilah told the court that Abdul Razak (who has been cleared of an abetment charge in this case)  had asked him to "advise" the woman and send her back to her hotel after she turned up outside Abdul Razak's house on the evening of Oct 19.

Azilah said Sirul Azhar, whose assistance he had sought to help resolve Abdul Razak’s problem, had agreed to send Altantuya back to the hotel because Azilah and his girlfriend, L/Cpl Rohaniza Roslan did not have the time to do so.

Azilah denied he and Sirul Azhar had stopped half-way during their journey from Abdul Razak’s house to Bukit Aman, to discuss their plans to kill the woman, and that this was their "mission" for that night.

Azilah and Sirul Azhar, both police Special Action Unit (UTK) personnel, are charged with murdering Altantuya between 10pm on Oct  19 and 1am on Oct 20, 2006 at a jungle clearing in Mukim Bukit Raja.

Tun Abdul Majid also questioned Azilah about Sirul Azhar’s four-wheel drive vehicle which Altantuya was last seen getting into.

Azilah said he did not know if it was Sirul Azhar’s vehicle and neither could he remember the registration number (CAC 1883).

Tun Abdul Majid: You are close friends and you can’t remember the car number?
Azilah: This car is not always parked at our office as it is a vehicle which is usually used for hunting and fishing excursions in the jungle, and for camping and other jungle activities.” 

There was laughter in the court when Azilah said he was not angry with Rohaniza for going to the karaoke that night, but merely suspicious that she may have been with another man.

He said he called Rohaniza when he and his fiancee, Norazilah Baharuddin, were on their way for supper in Wangsa Maju, adding that Norazila knew Rohaniza and that he was close to her.

“The background was noisy when I called her and she told me she was at the karaoke. I asked her 'Eh, why are you at the karaoke,” said Azilah.

The judge, Datuk Mohd Zaki Md Yasin, remarked: “How do I write this down ‘Eh, why are you at the karaoke?'  Were you angry with her?”

Azilah replied: “No, I was not angry with her, only a little suspicious. Who knows, maybe she was with another man, because what she told me earlier was that she was going to meet her friend, and then I find out that she is at a karaoke.

“Furthermore, she had promised to send me to Putrajaya that night."

Azilah said  he was not in possession of his gun between the afternoon of Oct 19 and the night on Oct 20, saying he left it in a cabinet in Bukit Aman after he had briefed colleagues he was supposed to lead on escort duty to Hong Kong.

“It was uncomfortable having the gun hanging on my waist without a holster as it caused with my skin to itch,” he said.

He said he would usually use a holster when he was on escort duty and his jacket would help to cover it up.

The hearing continues.

Comments (13)Add Comment
...
written by Kopi37, January 19, 2009 22:59:27
He got such a good memory about the usage of the jeep except to remember the no. CAC1883! What a liar he is! I doubt if he remember his father's name! The prosecutor was asking stupid question, seemed like complicit!
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 17
...
written by apasalahku, January 19, 2009 23:02:12
who cares about these 2 dumb cops and their f-ucked up love lives? I want najib on the stand!!
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 23
...
written by malsia1206, January 19, 2009 23:06:05
A UTK specially-trained personnel who expect to carry a sidearm without any holster is just like expecting a smoking addict carrying a packet of cigarettes without the box. They go together and it's hard for me to believe no holster is available for this trained expert. Even then, a holster is not a life-saving feature. Every armed specialist knows how to carry his weapon with or without a hoslter at all times when lives are at stake.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 11
...
written by onnetline, January 19, 2009 23:07:46
This chief inspecting dog in blue, Azila is a lying snake.
He doesn't know the power of telecommunication technology still !!!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 13
...
written by KingSolomon, January 19, 2009 23:08:37
Can someone provide the photos of these two suspects? Surely some people must have have them.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 16
...
written by onnetline, January 19, 2009 23:20:06
I wouldn't trust the head prosecutor to handle this case right. That corrupted GHANI PigTAIL is trying to make all the guilty parties look innocent !

It's one big damn charade ....... that's what it is !!!!!!!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 13
...
written by Highway16, January 19, 2009 23:36:40
Two strangers, could have so much "anger" to blow up a woman?
What drove these two policemen to shoot and blow up a human being?
If she is holding Razak Baginda for ransom of $500,000, would they kill her?
What is $500,000 from the millions from the submarine deal?
Something more than just the love affair and the $500,000!
The truth must be known. Those two lowly policemen are just scapegoats to you know who!.

report abuse
disagree 0
agree 10
...
written by sydput, January 19, 2009 23:38:27
Hmm. maybe they could have raped altantunya first, shot her an blew up the evidence. but that still could not explain the deleted immigration records.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 11
...
written by Tompios, January 19, 2009 23:39:36
oh so sweet! Azilah you are history for modern "story teller"!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 4
...
written by malgal, January 20, 2009 06:46:33
How did azilah conclude that razak could `sleep in peace ...' ? Premonition, gut feel, or did he prescribe valium?
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 2
...
written by advocatusdiaboli, January 20, 2009 08:23:39
This is a Wayang Kulit lah.
report abuse
disagree 1
agree 5
...
written by ahmadneil, January 20, 2009 09:22:24
Suspicious!
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 6
...
written by antiilluminati, January 21, 2009 10:41:31
Poor Aminah .. Looks like you have to come out from the grave to carry out your own justice.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM