A+ | A- | Reset

Demo: Zulkifli terima surat tunjuk sebab PDF Print
Posted by admin   
Monday, 08 September 2008 10:12

(Harakah) - Ahli Parlimen Kulim-Bandar Baharu, Zulkifli Noordin semalam dilaporkan menerima surat tunjuk sebab mengapa tindakan disiplin tidak boleh diambil terhadap beliau kerana mengetuai demonstrasi membantah forum anjuran Majlis Peguam pada 9 Ogos lalu.

"Hari ini KeADILan memberikan saya notis tunjuk sebab mengapa tindakan disiplin tidak boleh diambil terhadap saya kerana mengetuai Himpunan Aman Umat Islam membantah forum anjuran Majlis Peguam," kata beliau dalam blognya hari ini.

Zulkifli berkata, surat tersebut menyatakan kesalahan yang didakwa dilakukannya adalah menghalang forum "Masuk Islam: Artikel 121(1A)" anjuran Majlis Peguam.

"Saya mengambil sikap dalam keadaan Islam dihina saya akan tetap mempertahankan Islam, walaupun akan bercanggah dengan pendirian mana-mana pihak.

"Kalau tiba masa saya perlu memilih antara Islam dengan parti, saya tetap akan memilih Islam walaupun saya tahu akibatnya saya akan kehilangan dan kerugian, tambahan dalam keadaan Pakatan Rakyat dijangka mengambil alih kerajaan pada 16 September.

"Pada saya biarlah rugi duniawi daripada rugi di sisi Ilahi," katanya.

Kata Zulkifli lagi, beliau akan berdepan dengan Jawatankuasa Disiplin yang dijadualkan Selasa ini.

Sementara itu ketika dihubungi mStar Online, Zulkifli mengesahkan, beliau sudah menerima surat tunjuk sebab berkenaan.

"Ya, memang betul saya sudah terima surat tersebut di pejabat saya di Kuala Lumpur," katanya.

Jelasnya, Selasa yang ditetapkan oleh Jawatankuasa Disiplin KeADILan itu mungkin terpaksa ditunda kerana beliau mengendalikan kes di mahkamah.

"Saya mungkin akan meminta tarikh tersebut ditunda ke 15 September ini kerana minggu depan saya ada kes untuk dikendalikan di mahkamah," katanya yang ketika ini berada di kawasan Parlimennya.

Comments (6)Add Comment
...
written by Tompios, September 08, 2008 10:35:50
Kepala butuh kaulah! Jangan persempitkan fikiran Islam dalam otak kau. Lihat dengan jelas, Islam itu bukan berlandaskan Artikel 121(1A). Article ini membuat Anda tersimpang dari perjuangan Al-Quran yang suci. Kehidupan Islam dan keyakinan pada Al-Quran bukan bersifat unilateral di dunia ini tetapi bilateral dgn semua kehidupan lain di alam ini. Why? you cannot see the main justice on Islam? Your agenda buat anda jadi bigot!
report abuse
disagree 16
agree 25
...
written by Fatcat, September 08, 2008 11:31:13
No one is questioning your devotion to Islam...No one has denounced islam, it is a beautiful religion. UnderstanD?
report abuse
disagree 6
agree 11
...
written by shatis, September 08, 2008 20:07:28
Dei Zulkifli you are a real fool.. dont think people will sympathize you when you say i'm Muslim first before lawyer and Islam more important than your political party. It shows that you are real confused with what religion is. The moment you graduate as a lawyer you have the responsibility to uphold the law and act professionally. You earn your living by practising as lawyer and talk rubbish that you are muslim 1st and not a lawyer. Bloody hypocrite!! If you think you are right why dont you suggest the goverment not to give law seats to Muslims, just go and become syariah court lawyers instead. Imagine if a doctor says he is muslim first and refuses to treat an apostate who is dying in front of him.. IS that acceptable??? Now you know why Lawyers and Doctors are called professionals.. If you continue to say you are right, dont practice law you MORON, who doesn't have professionalism.
report abuse
disagree 6
agree 6
...
written by fandi, September 09, 2008 15:30:48
Article 11 of the Constitution.
Interesting article.............by Puteri Shehnaz Majid (Advocate & Solicitor)

Article 11 is relevant to Muslims too
Contributed to the Malaysian Bar website
by Puteri Shehnaz Majid
Friday, 26 May 2006, 14:40

Quite apart from BADAI's freedom to express their beliefs
(which they are certainly entitled to do), I am curious as to what it is
exactly they are afraid of? For whom do they purport to speak? For all
Muslims? That cannot be.
As a Muslim, I am embarrassed by their efforts, which in my
opinion are based on irrational fear, insecurity, and a serious lack of
understanding of what the Article 11 forum is seeking to achieve. I am not
opposed to the Inter-Faith Commission or indeed any other (official or
otherwise) form of inter-faith discussion. I am secure enough about my
religion (and the way I practise it) to discuss it openly, defend my views,
change them if necessary, and more importantly, learn and progress from the
open sharing of information and ideas. If you are a Muslim who chooses not
to engage in such discourse, then by all means, don't. But please, the
"sensitive" label is really starting to tug at my patience.
Let us not forget that the Article 11 forum aims to educate
Malaysian citizens on their rights under the Constitution. That is all. It
is clear that some of us have failed to realise that the Article 11 Forum
is not in any way encouraging apostasy; it is simply saying "Look, know your
rights. You should have the right to convert in or out of any religion if
you so choose, because that basic right has been guaranteed to you under
your Constitution. That right cannot be derogated, and it belongs to you
the moment you draw your first breath as a citizen of this world and of this
country."
The Holy Qur'an says "Unto you your religion, and unto me my
religion" (109:6). Exactly. This does not merely capture the Muslim v
Non-Muslim scenario, but more importantly in our context, the Muslim v
Muslim scenario. It irks me more when a fellow Muslim, or my leaders for
that matter, self-righteously impose their notional precepts and accordingly
restrict me, than if a non-Muslim were to do the same. This is because a
Muslim who does that is effectively insisting that "my understanding of
Islam is better than yours and should therefore be upheld over yours".
At the end of the day, it just seems to me that BADAI, and other
like-minded institutions (the government included), are insecure and
fearful. It is difficult for me to accept any other conclusion given the
circumstances. The Constitution guarantees certain fundamental rights.
Every citizen in this country should have the option to exercise those
rights, if they wish. Whether or not they do, does not affect the rights of
those who oppose the exercise of those rights.
They (and I am using this term loosely) banned The Passion of
The Christ for Muslims - why? Is it because after I come out of the cinema,
I am going to run to the next church I find, confess my sins and convert to
Christianity? Funnily enough, no one has addressed the call by some groups
in our country to ban The Da Vinci Code - why this hypocrisy and double
standard? Is it because they want Christians to watch the movie in hope
thatthey will walk out of the cinema disillusioned and convert to Islam?
They banned Babe - why? Is it because after I come out of the
cinema, I'm going to find the next Chinese restaurant and stuff my face
with pork, and afterwards rush for the shopping mall and purchase pig-skinned
lining shoes?
They won't allow anyone who wants to leave Islam to do so, or
even discuss the issue - why? Is it because if they do, the entire Muslim
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by fandi, September 09, 2008 15:54:35
Continue Article 11

population of this country will want to convert out? I would even go so far
as to say: so what? If I am allowed to exercise the freedom entrenched in
Article 11, and subsequently decide to convert out of Islam, what is it to
BADAI or anyone else? If 10 million Muslims subsequently choose to exercise
that right and convert out of Islam, what it is to BADAI or anyone else?
Will BADAI carry the weight of my sins and that of the other 10 million on
their shoulders as they march up to God on Judgment Day? I would have far
greater respect for my country (leaders and citizens included) if they left
me to choose my own path vis-à-vis my religion. I do not need my leaders or
any other self-righteous groups to decide that for me.
"Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion." So, thank you
for your concern, but if I am wrong about mine, then God (and God alone)
shall judge me in the life hereafter. I assure you that no member of BADAI
will be sitting on my judging committee and neither will I sit on any of
theirs. So in this lifetime, as a citizen of this country, please allow me
the right to exercise any and all freedoms guaranteed to me under the
Constitution. That is all I ask. Absolutely nothing more and nothing less
than what has already been guaranteed to me by virtue of being a citizen of
this dear country.


report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0
...
written by coalminecanary, September 10, 2008 04:02:53
Zulkifli, naik motor pegi Kabul berjuang dgn taliban lagi baik la.
report abuse
disagree 0
agree 0

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
 
< Prev   Next >
 
Some Images Hosted With
Thank You ImageShack!
 BLOGGERS AGAINST ISA

Powered and Optimized for:
Malaysia Today by MT-TEAM